The Denzie Way

[Madi]

Na i am not saying just watching in one day. They r doing for years. I personally know someone who win 50-80 k in one sitting. I follow him everyday 3 months. While we argue the airball is cheat or not , they are putting money in their pocket from that cheat machine. Ye the man also lose 50k in some day. But the overall he is winning big something like $500 k in 3 months. We all know play more number more lose. He play 23 number with different betsize.example

22
33
Now what
I dont know

25
Now what
I dont know what next spin.
He said put on 0 and 11 each $100.if lose he is gonna pay me back. Think about the level of confidence.
0 hit i got big.
What is the math behind this!

He said 2-2= 0, 3-3=0
While we are saying math shows we can beat.
But they are beating this game with birthday number everyday all day.

Ps: they dont come to play with $100
They come with $50k

[cht]

Rich and Madi,

You / we have a tendency  to notice (as a consequence of basic human nature) when people win big at roulette, baccarat, or whatever else -- maybe because when people win money , especially in public settings, they exhibit easily noticeable signals that people around them observe and remember.

However, what about all those times when they are keeping quiet and silent while they are losing even BIGGER amounts?

In fact, I would hazard a guess that these losing episodes far outnumber (in terms of frequency of occurrence) and far outweigh (in terms of monetary amounts) those winning episodes that you guys notice and remember so easily.

Just my .02 cents on this issue.

Spot on.

This is common understanding among chinese players. There's a saying in chinese amongst chinese players when they get praised when in the spotlight winning big -

"You see me win big today, but when I lose big you don't see me."

It's common to see players win big 100++K at baccarat tables in one sitting,  but it's also common knowledge to know about the many stories about patrons losing millions at casino games. Losing 100+K is normal, losing 1+million makes it to the headlines. Losing regularly of 30++K at the slots is pitiful.

[cht]

I read a lot of post about logical whys and hows VB will not work and simple logic tells us that they are correct.

I wonder how many of this same people spend time to look at the wheel and ball in action. How many wheels did they look at? My casino has close to 100 wheels with thousands of patrons every day, peak Sat, Sun and holiday.

I have said it so many times, if this aspect of VB does not work don't try to solve the problem, the simple and effective solution is to AVOID. My entire AP play is built upon this avoidance principle, take on only the simple effective part and discard the rest cumbersome part, that's it.

[denzie]

You can look at vb or wheel/dealers signature as you want but...

Here's the thing : the HE is small. Playing random bets can win too from time to time. But by trying to predict better accuracy it will put you above the HE. You don't need to make the right bet all the time. You just need to win a few. (If you don't play to many numbers that is)

[Steve]

Well the casino profits rather well with a tiny 2.7% edge.  Dont you agree?

[Mortagon]

The House Edge
link:://:.roulettician.com/articles/article1.html

[denzie]

Well the casino profits rather well with a tiny 2.7% edge.  Dont you agree?

Agreed. And human greed is even more dangerous!

[Roulettebeater]

Agreed. And human greed is even more dangerous!

maybe we should do like casino, let a computer play/take actions instead of us, this way we get rid of human greed.

[denzie]

maybe we should do like casino, let a computer play/take actions instead of us, this way we get rid of human greed.

Then first it needs the waterproof method too

[DoctorSudoku]

Well the casino profits rather well with a tiny 2.7% edge.  Dont you agree?

I think the HE is NOT the main reason why most gamblers lose (most of) their money in their casino excursions.

Variance (of the negative type) is the principal reason why casinos make so much money off of their gambling patrons.