Here´s why virtual betting does not always work

[psimoes]

On today´s Wiesbaden Spielbank Table 1, column B has slept for 26 spins. And there´s no sign of immediate recover. A rare event followed by a rarer event.
Imagine a system that said: "wait for a virtual loss of 26 spins in a row and bet on the awakening column". You´d still lose...

[Madi]

Virtual losses , trigger , wait for this or that doesnt work. To design a working system need to play every spin. Say i m gonna play 50 spin. My system should play every spin and come ahead whatever the spin sequence is. Thats how it should be. Just my opinion.

[Andre Chass]

I wait, I wait for that rare event that will hardly happen...

[kingmaq]

Wait, wait, wait ...don't tell me that my system lose 

[psimoes]

Playing every spin means you don´t waste time in the waiting.
The thing that bothers the most is not the wait, though. It´s that betting BBBBBBBBB has as much chance of winning and losing as CBCCABCAA. This means that betting 12 numbers every spin or every other spin is at the risk of losing at least 26 times in a row. The relief is that this is as rare as that hybernating column.

[kingmaq]

a winner is a loser who waited more and tried one more time.

[psimoes]

Thinking a bit more optmistically, the bright side is that betting two columns has a chance of winning 26 times in a row 

[cht]

"Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting different results."

Try new approaches give you a better chance.

[Steve]

First you need to know what's different or same

[cht]

To me all forum boards are doing the same thing repackaged in some form.

Thinking the same doing the same getting the same results, like a trap people can't break free from.

[psimoes]

Yep, IMO we should put more emphasis on alternative forms of Advantage Play, if there are any.