define, hot number, once and for all

[maestro]

And you say nonsense like 37 unique numbers will never spin in 37 spins. But actually if you checked enough spins, you'd find it happens exactly as often as ANY OTHER COMBINATION OF NUMBERS.

i would love to see it 37 in 37 spins

[cht]

U cant lose on number that didnt show up but u can also lose a lot on number that show once even twice even thrice even more. The 24 number things actually is not useful in field. Ye it appears 24 number. Do i bet all.No . Then whats the point. More real field action needed rather than logic.

I don't bet on all numbers that appeared - it wouldn't really be possible unless I was at a terminal or playing online. At a table I can't cover a large amount of numbers so I keep the amount of numbers that I play small. So I miss out on some great wins - yes. I only need one or a few of my played numbers to win above expected, and that always happens.

His secret sauce is he predicts future hot numbers. 

Smarties know how not to lose the loss spins. 

[Madi]

If this is the case  whats point to say 24 number appears . No point. Core thing is not that one. If u bet 8 number u need to win 9 time in 37 spin. If u miss u need to try next cycle with positive progression. What he doesnt say is that about losing. It also loses in individual set of x number of spin. Wins on average and goes up.

[DoctorSudoku]

If u miss u need to try next cycle with positive progression.

If you are losing and you are trying to recoup your loss by increasing your betting amounts for subsequent spins, how is that a positive progression?

It is a negative progression.

[Madi]

If you play 8 number and 1 number win in 37 spin u can put some more on that number only not on all the numbers. Thats how its positive

[Steve]

Turbo:

A coin has two sides. The chance of 2 unique sides in 2 tosses is 1 in 2x2=4 (per specific side)

The chance of 2 x heads is also 2x2. The chance of 2 tails is 1 in also 2x2.

A die has 6 sides. The chance of 6 unique sides is 1 in  6x6x6x6x6x6=46,656 (for specific number)
Its the same as any combination of sides.

See the trend?

But according to your logic, it will never happen. Random has limits.

The same applies to roulette wheels.

Again, any combination of results is just as likely. On a die, the combination of 1,5,6,3,2,3 will happen just as often as 1,2,3,4,5,6.

The only difference in roulette there are 37 numbers.

Your claim that random has limits is incredibly backwards. You are misleading people.

Just answer me this. Do you think 37 unique numbers in  roulette will happen less often than any other combination of numbers?

[maestro]

A coin has two sides.

no this is not truth they are 3 sides....

[plolp]

A hot number, it's a number that's impatient

[TurboGenius]

Just answer me this. Do you think 37 unique numbers in  roulette will happen less often than any other combination of numbers?

No one uses a system like that - who has a brain in their head.
So when you see a #4 followed by a #21 then bet #2 ? 
Of course the spins coming out 1,2,3,4,5 are the same as the spins coming out 21,1,34,21,2
and everyone knows that.
No one is pretending to predict with 100% accuracy what the next spin will be - (well, maybe using a computer - and even then you're going to be wrong a lot) but I can obviously surely do it better than 1:37 and even better than 1:35 that would be needed to overcome the house edge. I explained how to do it too.
Random doesn't have limits ?
Chart the std deviation like I did before - behold !  lol
Wouldn't you know - it stays withing a specific limit and over time even balances out right where it should. Like I said - wheel data is checked for randomness and to detect bias - do they say "OH, that's just random" when the test fails ? Why not ? Does someone in the back of the room jump up and say "those results could have actually happened - it's 1 in a billion chances but it's perfectly normal". ?
So of course random has limits, it performs in such a way that it can be charted and data can be used to check wheels.... but not according to you ?

[D1]

You probably don't even have to test that, do you ?
Numbers will repeat. Fact
A number can't repeat unless it's shown once. Obvious fact
A number can't show twice unless it's shown once. Ditto
A number can't show three times unless it's shown two times. More Ditto
You aren't trying to magically pick a 1:37 bet anymore - like I said above,
more like 1:24 or even better...yes the payout stays 35:1. How nice.
Positive progression to maximize benefit of having the math in your favor - Common sense.
You can't lose a single unit on a number that never appears because you'd
never be betting on it. Obvious,
If any of these comments don't make sense or defy belief - I guess I can post it again.
If you can accept these as facts that they are - you can actually turn the math of the game into your favor.
Does it win every time you try ? No. Is it better than sliced bread ? Probably.
Does it win every "session" if you consider a session as I do - Yep

So Turbo I would like to ask you when a number first shows how many times would you play that number for it to show a 2nd time ?

[TurboGenius]

So Turbo I would like to ask you when a number first shows how many times would you play that number for it to show a 2nd time ?

I only play potentially hot bets. - a location showing above expected in the future.
I can't know if a location is going to stay hot, show at average or go cold, etc.. no one can.
I do though know what locations have potential to be hot and which don't.
Anyone can do this using the same math that the nay-sayers use to try to prove that it's impossible.

@Steve - 6th place last week and the highest (by far) roulette player.
today ends the next week's challenge - got to 7th place this week (so far - I might have to stay there as the next highest spot is pretty far ahead of me). the next highest roulette player is in 27th place (at the moment). This is only two weeks - but since the site supposedly favors everyone and is rigged for people to win - why aren't there at least 2-3-4 roulette players in the top 10 ? Is it rigged only for me ? Have a I figured out the secret rigging and using it to my advantage lol. After tonight it resets again for the new week.
Would you put money on me being in the top 10 again next week ? 
That would be a good bet to make.

[maestro]

Would you put money on me being in the top 10 again next week ?

i would but if you fail i will find you and i think i want my money back....i must remember casino movie...

[TurboGenius]

i would but if you fail i will find you and i think i want my money back....

lol
Failure is never an option.

[IVO]

Hi Turbogenius,

cycle = 37 spins, you bet from spin no.1 till spin no. 37, is it right please?
it is without some trigger, you start from spin no.1, right?
Do I have to study last one cycle or last two cycles?
How many cycles does have your "session" please?
Location = does it mean sector on wheel or some other group of numbers please?

Thanks in advance
And I do apologize for my english 

[D1]

I only play potentially hot bets. - a location showing above expected in the future.
I can't know if a location is going to stay hot, show at average or go cold, etc.. no one can.
I do though know what locations have potential to be hot and which don't.
Anyone can do this using the same math that the nay-sayers use to try to prove that it's impossible.

When you say locations I take it you are talking about a particular section or sector of the wheel ?
Say a sector containg 5 numbers or something similar ?