Untouchable

[ignatus]

This is 1-5 splits bet.

For each hit in column 1 or 3 place 1 SPLIT (at the unhit part within that particular Street hit), do this in a progressive bet until 5 Splits bet (1+1+1+1+1 Splits bet) WHEN 5 splits are bet begin progression, (beginning with 2u). Stop/Restart at any hit.

Progression: 2 3 4 6 8 11 16 22 30 42 58 80 111 154 213

BR/Stoploss: 200u

[blueman]

Ignatus, do you bet at 6,7,8 street (split) or just at the top 5?

[ignatus]

Ignatus, do you bet at 6,7,8 street (split) or just at the top 5?

No, the way i played it/tested it was with 5 splits only.

[blueman]

My third test game on BVNZ comes with 17x progression: .............80-111 -154-213- ? - hit (x17)?? To dangerous with 10 numbers? Google english, sorry.

[ignatus]

My third test game on BVNZ comes with 17x progression: .............80-111 -154-213- ? - hit (x17)?? To dangerous with 10 numbers? Google english, sorry.

Yes i know. playing with progression is always a risk, but with a set wingoal & stoploss it May work...

[Ratwood85]

My third test game on BVNZ comes with 17x progression: .............80-111 -154-213- ? - hit (x17)?? To dangerous with 10 numbers? Google english, sorry.

are you testing this with RNG real money if YES, do with your own risk..

[blueman]

Yes i know. playing with progression is always a risk, but with a set wingoal & stoploss it May work...

I know, but the first loss in the third game? Maybe go to seven splits?

[blueman]

are you testing this with RNG real money if YES, do with your own risk..

not with real money! 

[DoctorSudoku]

Progression: 2 3 4 6 8 11 16 22 30 42 58 80 111 154 213

That progression is intolerably long. Can't you just incorporate some virtual losses at the beginning and make that progression several steps shorter?

[Madi]

Is this a realistic progression when design to play in real casino ?