Hit and Run Strategies - A thread to share new ideas and methods

[Ratwood85]

Seems nice,
Do you think i can play your method using three sectors instead EC?

Emmm.. i haven't figured how to play it with 3option..

Thanks for sharing your system!

I think your system is risky. Why don't you bet more that way? You said that you made a very good profit...

Did you guess 15 wins, really?

The fact is I BUSTED MY BR Andre... Already told you.. do you think i suddenly choose to guess 15sequence Before it, i wrote 8sequence BUSTED, 10sequence BUSTED, 12sequence BUSTED and the last time i played 15sequence BUSTED too.. what i mean with Busted is that what i wrote (8,10,12 and 15sequence) 100% match with the spin result.

[DoctorSudoku]

Here is John Legend's Pattern Breaker:

link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=4655.0

One of my all time favorite roulette threads.

[DoctorSudoku]

Another interesting one is Divide and Conquer:

link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=4862.0

[Proofreaders2000]

The first system I remember playing on a live online wheel in 2008.

Winkel's Great Universal Theory (GUT)

link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=2681.0

[Andre Chass]

Please only HAR methods here.

Thanks!

[cht]

Another interesting one is Divide and Conquer:

link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=4862.0

Use the same underlying concept for EC with a tweak to avoid the negative martingale into a hole.

(A)
Eg. Instead of 3sections for doz -

1............2............3............

2 sections for EC -

1...........2...........

(B) Tweak
When you encounter a loss the next bet must be in the other section, all bets under same section becomes virtual.

Eg. If loss under section 1, next bet also under section 1 skip the bet, record results as virtual until there's a bet on section 2, then continue to bet from there.

If loss again on section 2, next bet also section 2, skip bet, record results until there's a bet on section 1.

For winners, continue to bet as normal.

Best to play Divide & Conquer EC variant with baccarat flatbet hit and run.

[Andre Chass]

Off topic

I'm a guy who likes to tell the truth. When I have wins I like to talk about it, when I have losses I like to talk it too. I just had a loss of $4800. It hurts like hell. It makes us feel lost. I'm posting my situation here because I don't have anyone to talk about it. I did not expect it to happen soon by the end of the year. I had the loss because I made a mistake. I place the bet on the wrong sectors. I feel like an idiot and I'm very depressed.

Roulette is a hell of game!

If anyone can give me a word I'd appreciate it.

[Proofreaders2000]

maybe take a break from gambling for a while

(Not necessarily permanent, just
enough to 'catch your breath'   )

Perhaps some charity work or if you're married/longterm
girlfriend put your energy into some large projects she'll like)

At a time of your choosing-(if ever) start
researching systems for your next betting experience.

(whew, got it all out) 

[Andre Chass]

Thank you my friend!

I think I'll do that, I need a break.

I'm really tired trying make money.
Lately my life is focused on just it. Roulette, roulette and roulette... I can't sleep well because It. Trying to figure out the HG, an invecible strategy. I really need to start doing and thinking about other things.

I'm feeling bad, sick, addict...

[DoctorSudoku]

Please only HAR methods here.

Thanks!

Both Pattern Breaker and Divide-and-Conquer can be played on a hit and run basis.

[Andre Chass]

Both Pattern Breaker and Divide-and-Conquer can be played on a hit and run basis.

Thanks my friend, but at the moment I'm not feeling psychologically good to think about it.

[Proofreaders2000]

I'm really tired trying make money.
Lately my life is focused on just it. Roulette, roulette and roulette... I can't sleep well because It. Trying to figure out the HG, an invecible strategy. I really need to start doing and thinking about other things.

I'm feeling bad, sick, addict...

I'm the same way.  That's why I write a system when I feel the urge to gamble and play with fun money in testing it--this way when/if the system loses I lose 'fun money'

not real money.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you think the addiction is serious link:://:.gamblersanonymous.org/ga/

[DoctorSudoku]

Best to play Divide & Conquer EC variant with baccarat flatbet hit and run.

Actually, nearly all EC betting methods designed for roulette work better on baccarat -- the HE for the Banker bet is 1.06% and the HE for the Player bet is 1.24% and you do NOT lose your Banker or Player bet on the TIE outcome.

They also work nearly as well or better on the Pass versus Don't Pass bet in craps -- the HE for both the Pass and Don't Pass bets is around 1.4% (in addition, by taking odds on the Pass bet or laying odds on the Don't Pass bet, the HE is pushed below 1%).

[Drazen]

Actually, nearly all EC betting methods designed for roulette work better on baccarat -- the HE for the Banker bet is 1.06% and the HE for the Player bet is 1.24% and you do NOT lose your Banker or Player bet on the TIE outcome.

They also work nearly as well or better on the Pass versus Don't Pass bet in craps -- the HE for both the Pass and Don't Pass bets is around 1.4% (in addition, by taking odds on the Pass bet or laying odds on the Don't Pass bet, the HE is pushed below 1%).

EC Methods in games with lower HE work "better". If only HE is our biggest enemy, right?

But what about devices (for generating randomness) in those games for example? Do they work the same when producing randomness is in question?

Is randomness really the same no matter from which physical source its been created? Maybe good measure to answer that would be standard deviation (STD)?

If we take Ec-s generated from roulette (unbiased) biggest stretch on EC-s we can see is around 5.2 STD. That is somethhing around 30 EC-s in a row for example. I know Bayes conducted such test over hundreds of millions numbers.

But what if we for example have one dice to generate Ec-s. Or 2 dices. Or 52 cards which are shuffled after every 10 cards drawn? Or wheel with 50 pockets or wheel with 100 pockets?

Would STD on EC-s always be the same?

What do you guys think?

Cheers

[Andre Chass]

I'm really tired trying make money.
Lately my life is focused on just it. Roulette, roulette and roulette... I can't sleep well because It. Trying to figure out the HG, an invecible strategy. I really need to start doing and thinking about other things.

I'm feeling bad, sick, addict...

I'm the same way.  That's why I write a system when I feel the urge to gamble and play with fun money in testing it--this way when/if the system loses I lose 'fun money'

not real money.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A lot of time is spent creating images of the great and wonderful things they are going to do as soon as they make the big win. Picture themselves leading a pleasant gracious life, made possible by the huge sums of money they will accrue from their 'system'. Servants, penthouses, nice clothes, charming friends, yachts, and world tours are a few of the wonderful things that are just around the corner after a big win is finally made.

Pathetically, however, there never seems to be a big enough winning to make even the smallest dream come true. They gamble to dream still greater dreams. When failing, they gamble in reckless desperation and the depths of their misery are fathomless as their dream world comes crashing down. Sadly, they will struggle back, dream more dreams, and of course suffer more misery. No one can convince them that their great schemes will not someday come true. They believe they will, for without this dream world, life for them would not be tolerable.

I think I quite little like that. I wanna be rich playing roulette...