Repeats Prog Method

[Andre Chass]

So how about we try wait for 14 numbers (12 uniques and 2 repeated)?
I think most people want to know what is going to happen in the next ten spins. It doesn't cost a lot to test this.

I know a table that allows 30 cents minimum bets. I'll try it and take my own conclusions.

[Proofreaders2000]

I love your persistence Andre :d

I found this GLC progression for 12 numbers that might be helpful

1,1,2,3,4,5,6,9,12,17,25,34 (stop)=119 units

[Proofreaders2000]

Here's Track4 software to track uniques, non-hit, twice-hit numbers, etc.

[Andre Chass]

I love your persistence Andre :d

I found this GLC progression for 12 numbers that might be helpful

1,1,2,3,4,5,6,9,12,17,25,34 (stop)=119 units

Lol...

I will persist until I succeed!

Thank you. It will be helpful!

[Andre Chass]

Here's Track4 software to track uniques, non-hit, twice-hit numbers, etc.

Thank you very much!

I'll give it a try!

Happy New Year! I wish you all the best!

[Andre Chass]

Well, after some tests I think the best way to play it is we get 12 unique numbers with no repeats and keep a 4 progression (maybe 6) betting stage. So if you do blow it, you can easily recover.

I'm working alone in this method. I would like to join forces with someone to try to improve this strategy.

I'm in a dilemma! I dont know for sure when to start getting the 12 unique numbers. I enter the table, but when do I start? I'm trying to figure it out.

Anyway I made 90$ in profit this morning...

[nottophammer]

I'm in a dilemma! I dont know for sure when to start getting the 12 unique numbers. I enter the table, but when do I start?

As soon as you start to play you have the 37 unique all to come, count them off when the 25 th unique hits that leaves your 12, you now have a choice, start to bet with your prog or wait, my avg says they hit with in 4 spins, so you could wait, but you know they could hit with-in that 4 spins.

[nottophammer]

the darts are starting c u later

[ewarwoowar]

Hi Andre and thanks for discussing your method on here. I've tested it a little, as per the initial posts and found it to work well so far.
I've tested real money and I'm up 186 units.
Notto, I enjoy your input on here and you obviously go to a lot of trouble with your charts.
I'm not sure we're all on the same sheet though here.
From what I read, Andre approaches the table and notes the spins and when he's collected 12 unique numbers, he bets them.
Notto, It looks like you've been testing betting the last 12 to hit from the 37. So, in other words, when you have 25 numbers that have hit, you bet the remaining 12.
Is this correct?
Andre is betting the FIRST 12 to come out, not the LAST 12.
Have I got this right guys, or have I totally misunderstood your posts?     
Also Andre, it looks like you've tweaked the method a little along the way. What have you found to be the best way so far?
I've just been tracking to get 12, with a maximum of 1 repeater, itself repeating a maximum of 1 time, then betting those 12.
If I get a double repeater or more than 1 number repeating I just look back at the spins and retrack.
I've only done a handful of tests and the worst run so far is LLW. The majority of the games end LW or even just W on the first spin.

Looking forward to more tests and results guys.

Cheers.

[Andre Chass]

As soon as you start to play you have the 37 unique all to come, count them off when the 25 th unique hits that leaves your 12

This way I'll be betting the numbers not shown. The strategy I play is betting the 12 unique numbers and use the progression waiting for a repeat.

you now have a choice, start to bet with your prog or wait, my avg says they hit with in 4 spins, so you could wait, but you know they could hit with-in that 4 spins.

Wait what?

I'm waiting for you explanation. Thanks!

[Andre Chass]

Hi Andre and thanks for discussing your method on here. I've tested it a little, as per the initial posts and found it to work well so far.
I've tested real money and I'm up 186 units.
Notto, I enjoy your input on here and you obviously go to a lot of trouble with your charts.
I'm not sure we're all on the same sheet though here.
From what I read, Andre approaches the table and notes the spins and when he's collected 12 unique numbers, he bets them.
Notto, It looks like you've been testing betting the last 12 to hit from the 37. So, in other words, when you have 25 numbers that have hit, you bet the remaining 12.
Is this correct?
Andre is betting the FIRST 12 to come out, not the LAST 12.
Have I got this right guys, or have I totally misunderstood your posts?     
Also Andre, it looks like you've tweaked the method a little along the way. What have you found to be the best way so far?
I've just been tracking to get 12, with a maximum of 1 repeater, itself repeating a maximum of 1 time, then betting those 12.
If I get a double repeater or more than 1 number repeating I just look back at the spins and retrack.
I've only done a handful of tests and the worst run so far is LLW. The majority of the games end LW or even just W on the first spin.

Looking forward to more tests and results guys.

Cheers.

Thanks for share your results!

You're right! You are playing the same way like me.

I think notto is not understand the method.

[Andre Chass]

What have you found to be the best way so far?
I've just been tracking to get 12, with a maximum of 1 repeater, itself repeating a maximum of 1 time, then betting those 12.
If I get a double repeater or more than 1 number repeating I just look back at the spins and retrack.

That's the best way! I prefer waiting for 12 uniques with no repeater and bet them. I enter the table and wait it to happen.
You can use a progression like this 1,1,2,3 or 1,2,3,4 or a extended progression 1,1,2,3,4,6,9,14...
Your choice and risky!

My dilemma is when to start counting the 12 Uniques.

[ewarwoowar]

I'd count when you arrive at the table and I'd also use some of the history too - if you think you can trust it. That way you can cut down on your waiting time.
Notto is playing a different way, but I'd not dismiss his method. It may be better to bet the 12 numbers at the end of the cycle, rather than at the beginning?
We'd have to test some more.
I've just had LLLLL in my last test. 

Cheers.

[Andre Chass]

I'd count when you arrive at the table and I'd also use some of the history too - if you think you can trust it. That way you can cut down on your waiting time.

I do the same!

Notto is playing a different way, but I'd not dismiss his method. It may be better to bet the 12 numbers at the end of the cycle, rather than at the beginning?
We'd have to test some more.
I've just had LLLLL in my last test. 

You could use aggressive progression 1,1,2,3,4,6,9,14... Rarely you'll have a loss.
But is necessary a large bankroll.

Cheers.

Nottophammer is betting for non hit numbers. We are playing for a repeat.

[Andre Chass]

Since I started using this strategy, I have not had losses yet using aggressive progression. It went to 6 steps max.