Repeats Prog Method

[6th-sense]

Thanks for replying..only in short term does that mean you hit the losing sequence..regardless of of progression? ..or becouse there was a progression problem

[Andre Chass]

Thanks for replying..only in short term does that mean you hit the losing sequence..regardless of of progression? ..or becouse there was a progression problem

Does it means that playing this way, only flat bet. And you will have more losses than wins. There's no way to use progression.

[6th-sense]

What I’m trying to get at regardless of how many numbers are red or black you would still use the same progression amount on less or higher numbers of the numbers that are out so in theory you would rake in more profit as less numbers are bet on and the sequence of rbrbrbrb or brbrbrbr would be the only losing factor would be interested if these sequences happened a lot against what the potential return of less numbers bet but with normal progression amount on them etc

[6th-sense]

Your progression would still be the same but only put on the numbers of colour out following the last..if you know you are going to hit within 8 spins only a losing sequence would result in failure..

[Andre Chass]

What I’m trying to get at regardless of how many numbers are red or black you would still use the same progression amount on less or higher numbers of the numbers that are out so in theory you would rake in more profit as less numbers are bet on and the sequence of rbrbrbrb or brbrbrbr would be the only losing factor would be interested if these sequences happened a lot against what the potential return of less numbers bet but with normal progression amount on them etc

I will say it again. It doesn't work! I have tested it for days. There's no way to use the same progression.
Do you tests and get your own conclusions.

[6th-sense]

Thanks for the reply.. if the progression incorporates each new number spun and comes out in profit if hit surely it’ll come out in profit using the exact same progression regardless of how many numbers you put it on that’s red or black as they could be less or half or more even if they were all red or all black only the losing sequence would result in failure ..just trying to get my head around that it doesn’t work..I will test as you say..in this I was thinking of your aggressive approach

[cht]

6th-sense, I like your contribution effort. But I agree with Andre, it doesn't work. No problem just throw ideas out there for us to consider.

Look at the attach picture as example. We check for max 1 repeat after 16 unique appears. The dark green 16 tells us the 16 unique with zero repeat in column F(Unique1). We then start the count for 12 unique(29 to 16 with 29 and 22 repeat but is ignored) The 1st spin after that is zero (unique), so we start bet 3 step progression for the 12 unique - 19 lose followed by 33 win. This can happen on any of the unique columns but we only bet the earliest column if there are more than one.

Another set of 40 spin sequence of 30 spins each -

10 win / 2 loss
4 win / 2 loss
8 win / 3 loss

Btw Andre, while testing I saw RFH of 22 spins twice, so be careful with your 20 unique bet.

Another important point when testing, can you record down which spin win out of the 3 spins, eg. W1 or W2 or W3 or L(loss) I notice that majority of the wins is on win W1. So why not just bet 1st spin for a 1:2 odds ?

[Roulettebeater]

Andre

As I said, your method is solid !
I have tested it against huge database, basically I searched for a sequence of >= 20 distinct numbers ( per rotation +/- 20 width).

Can you share with me the bot, please ?

Cheers

[cht]

Andre

As I said, your method is solid !
I have tested it against huge database, basically I searched for a sequence of >= 20 distinct numbers ( per rotation +/- 20 width).

Can you share with me the bot, please ?

Cheers

I ask Andre about the bot but he just pretend he never read my request.  Come on Andre, share with Roulettebeater and me on PM pls, TQ

Hey Roulettebeater, can you read through my post above about my betselection, write a program to test it if it's a winner or not -
1. 3 steps progression bet, and
2. The 1st bet only that I explained in the above post.

This will save us tedious manual testing time and the result is more accurate over a large sample size. TQ for your help

Dumbfark, nobody is helping to test, all lazy freeloaders

[6th-sense]

Thanks cht for your reply and Andres saves me a lot of testing

[Proofreaders2000]

One more element to add.  The time of day to place the bet

Story: One man makes 33K/year starting his betting at 6:00am (when the casino officially opened)-I noticed at 3:25am CST USA Celtic Casino has a 15 minute downtime to repair/clean wheel

As the story goes the guy would play his progression
bet $100 on EC's until he made his $100 for the day,

then he would leave and come in the same time the next day.
(From what I understand he never lost his bankroll ever)

[Roulettebeater]

Hey Andre

Please share The bot with us (cht and me)

Thank you very much

[Roulettebeater]

Cht, can you write again what I should
Test ?

[cht]

Cht, can you write again what I should
Test ?

Here's the exact betselection -

1. Wait for 16 unique with max 1 repeat.

2. Starting from the next spin, count 12 unique (there might be repeats but ignore them, *plus no more than 5 repeats)

3. First spin after 12 unique, if repeat no bet, sequence ended

4. First spin after 12 unique is unique, bet for repeat 3 steps progression 53 chips br(more realistic than 692 chips)

5. Each win is average +16 chips

Roulettebeater, the above is the betselection.

The cumulative table looks like this -
4 steps progression(based on my proposed betselection)

12 x 1chip   = total chips loss 12 chips - win 24 chips, net win 24 chips
13 x 1chip   = total chips loss 25 chips - win 23 chips, net win 11 chips
14 x 2chip   = total chips loss 53 chips - win 44 chips, net win 19 chips

This is the 3 steps progression.

The excel sheet is on post #123.

The picture for the above betselection is on post #141.

Can you/anyone test the betselection pls ? TQ

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Another set of 40 spin sequence of 30 spins each -

8 win / 2 loss
13 win / 2 loss
7 win / 3 loss

Done for the day.

[Roulettebeater]

Roulettebeater, the above is the betselection.
This is the 3 steps progression.

The excel sheet is on post #123.

The picture for the above betselection is on post #141.

Can you/anyone test the betselection pls ? TQ

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Another set of 40 spin sequence of 30 spins each -

8 win / 2 loss
13 win / 2 loss
7 win / 3 loss

Done for the day.

Sorry but I have technical difficulties to implement an auto test using your too-much complex Betselection.


Why don't you just play as Andre suggesting ?

Andre is assisting for 12 uniques and betting 8 steps, if you can't afford the the 8 progressions, u can just hold on untill 16 uniques appear and bet 4 steps, you will pay eventually a penalty which is the time !