Repeats Prog Method

[cht]

Sorry but I have technical difficulties to implement an auto test using your too-much complex Betselection.


Why don't you just play as Andre suggesting ?

Andre is assisting for 12 uniques and betting 8 steps, if you can't afford the the 8 progressions, u can just hold on untill 16 uniques appear and bet 4 steps, you will pay eventually a penalty which is the time !

I have zero confidence that betting against 20 unique starting from 12 unique with a 8 step progression has a positive expectancy. Off the top of my head it's a luck betselection stepping over the bomb 21 unique.

Moreover based on his 8 steps progression, I have shown that it's net cumulative loss from the 5th step onward.

My interest in Andre's idea is to run autobot to scan and place bets with online casino, something I'm very new to and much to learn. I believe with the right optimised betselection flatbet this can be a winner which can be used to milk multiple online casino at the same time all done by a bot(I just learn about this as I tested it today.)

If this betselection can be tested accurately over a large sample size, then it can be established with empirical evidence that this betselection does indeed have a positive expectancy. For now, I don't have the time to commit besides today, I will come back to this much later when time avail, so to the back burner.

So, the status remains unconfirmed at beta testing stage only. To be revisited some time in the future.

[nottophammer]

just got Morts #'s for today.
Here is what Andre wants. In blue 12 unique with 1 repeat.


You're just better off betting for a repeat with 1st 10 spins, using 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2,2,3.  Today win #16

yesterday


#11

A 76% or better chance of a repeat with 1st 10 spins.

Look at 716 daily games using 1st 10 spins, 9/10, means 1 repeat, been 321 games.

off topic i know but better use 1st 10 spins for a repeat, its shown in colbster topic in math section page, 2

[Roulettebeater]

Cht,

I understand your concern, however I can tell u that Andre method (8 steps ) can win more than it loses.
My test showed that max 24 uniques can happen ( with very low probability ) - think of the law of thirds.

[cht]

Cht,

I understand your concern, however I can tell u that Andre method (8 steps ) can win more than it loses.
My test showed that max 24 uniques can happen ( with very low probability ) - think of the law of thirds.

IF betting against 20 uniques has a positive expectancy, then run a bot to bet from 17 unique 3 steps progression with multiple online casino.

[Roulettebeater]

The baseline / theory is :

Max 24 uniques in a row.

Everyone can use this baseline as he wants and use it in his own strategy 

[cht]

Anyway I'm only interested in Andre's idea from the angle of bot online casino betting. For b&m casino betting, there's much better positive expectancy method that I posted on Madi's thread.

Andre, take whatever you can from my contribution here and best of luck that you continue to win big. Cheers !

[cht]

Looking for anyone who's competent to code autobot and is familiar with actual running experience of autobot with multiple online casinos.

[Andre Chass]

It looks like it's become a bot forum here. Please, let's get back to the topic.

link:s://youtu.be/xTK9UosVyOE

link:s://wetransfer.com/downloads/810ba5df324b1040cdc0951c8887323020171230230815/640fcbf202c5543b615518c9e161482e20171230230815/778317

It needs JAVA 8 JRE in your computer.

[Andre Chass]

Now, please stop talking about bot or I will close the thread. Thanks.

[Roulettebeater]

thx andre,

please dont hesitate asking me for further/special tests.

i am glad to help

[denzie]

So you have 12 numbers in your selection. 8 step progression. HOPING the repeat come from those 12 and NOT from the next numbers. I can guarantee it will lose. Why? Been there and done that while breaking my head on the WTF thread last year. Sure you can go long without a loss. But after 1000 cycles you will be in a loss just as i was. Not dissing anyone but just telling what ive seen. 

[cht]

So you have 12 numbers in your selection. 8 step progression. HOPING the repeat come from those 12 and NOT from the next numbers. I can guarantee it will lose. Why? Been there and done that while breaking my head on the WTF thread last year. Sure you can go long without a loss. But after 1000 cycles you will be in a loss just as i was. Not dissing anyone but just telling what ive seen. 

Agree.  But if you look at the details which I did there's golden opportunity there, I missed it initially. For those who see it good for you. 
Next step is to mine it and it's too much time & effort to do it manually that's why we need a tool to help us do the job.

[Roulettebeater]

I tested this method well, i looked for a sequence of 20 numbers that contain unique numbers, i found hardly a few!
the probability is damn low!

why you judging thie method without providing some real proofs?!

it's easy to say that 'IT WILL LOSE'!

[cht]

I tested this method well, i looked for a sequence of 20 numbers that contain unique numbers, i found hardly a few!
the probability is damn low!

why you judging thie method without providing some real proofs?!

it's easy to say that 'IT WILL LOSE'!

I don't doubt your test result. 

But I disagree the way Andre bet it will win itlr. You still need to know how to bet it profitably. I have done my test thoroughly. If you don't bet it properly I can assure you lose itlr but bet it optimally you are assured a low risk winner. The betting process if done manually is tedious as you say, you pay with time ! So we use a machine(I can't    use that word)

[Roulettebeater]

i just found these sequences with width 20 numbers that contain unique numbers and numbers between 12 and 20 are not included in the list of numbers between 1 and 12:


    ID         ID
------ ----------
  1929       1948
  6256       6275
  5834       5853
  5835       5854
  6482       6501
  6610       6629
  3966       3985
12998      13017
12999      13018
13035      13054
13036      13055

    ID         ID
------ ----------
13037      13056
13038      13057
15303      15322
16174      16193
17255      17274
17574      17593
17575      17594
17709      17728
22302      22321
21845      21864
21846      21865

    ID         ID
------ ----------
19973      19992
19995      20014
22863      22882
23549      23568
27000      27019
32258      32277
32407      32426
32408      32427
32411      32430
32893      32912
36794      36813

    ID         ID
------ ----------
36795      36814
40350      40369
40351      40370
40352      40371
40701      40720
40702      40721
40703      40722
39604      39623
41331      41350
39224      39243
40068      40087

    ID         ID
------ ----------
43451      43470
43452      43471
71320      71339
71321      71340
71322      71341
71636      71655
50110      50129
72582      72601
72583      72602
72584      72603
72585      72604

    ID         ID
------ ----------
72586      72605
72587      72606
72588      72607
72716      72735
72717      72736
72750      72769
72751      72770
72752      72771
59800      59819
61208      61227
61209      61228

    ID         ID
------ ----------
79402      79421
56490      56509
56491      56510
66478      66497
56875      56894
45076      45095
45077      45096
55272      55291
55316      55335
55317      55336
55318      55337

    ID         ID
------ ----------
46697      46716
46698      46717
53262      53281
47878      47897
47879      47898
59489      59508
59494      59513
48297      48316
48298      48317
48383      48402
57012      57031

    ID         ID
------ ----------
57013      57032
74645      74664
74646      74665
74647      74666
74779      74798
48699      48718
74957      74976
74958      74977
74959      74978
49146      49165
49147      49166

    ID         ID
------ ----------
64796      64815
64797      64816
64798      64817
64799      64818
64800      64819
51798      51817
51799      51818
51867      51886
69963      69982
69964      69983
41856      41875

    ID         ID
------ ----------
41857      41876
41858      41877
41859      41878

Total 113 out of 1000000 ... thats a damn fuck low probability