Repeats Prog Method

[Andre Chass]

The fact is that all methods can have losses. Even playing with computers you will have losses.
The important thing is that the strategy produce more wins than losses.
I'm still trying to improve the strategy, trying to find new ideas, new ways to play it.
I accept help and suggestions to it!

[cht]

I have found only 127 sequence that violates Andre's method in a DB that contains 100k spins

get the conclusion from this test by yourself

May I make a request to test the following -
How many sequence per 100,000 spins for -
1. 12 unique
2. 13 unique
3. 14 unique
4. 15 unique
5. 16 unique
6. 17 unique
7. 18 unique
8. 19 unique

TQ for your help.

[Steve]

See link:s://:.roulettephysics.com/testing/ - basically days and weeks worth of spins is not significant. I won for around a year with a losing system, before I gave all and probably more back to the casino.

[Ratwood85]

Hi Andre, please check my PM.

[Ratwood85]

The grail is in you.. not the outside.. it's in your brain and your heart.

Find a system and testing with thousand spin, when it worth we go for real, and if we failed we get stuck and search another. Always try to beat the wheel that continous produce random.

[Ratwood85]

This morning session +116unit.
"I'm the boss, i'm the future"
Do not try to beat the wheel.
Follow your heart, just do it.

[cht]

See link:s://:.roulettephysics.com/testing/ - basically days and weeks worth of spins is not significant. I won for around a year with a losing system, before I gave all and probably more back to the casino.

Personal real money success of any size or length of time can never validate the system. It's lunacy to think otherwise !

[Andre Chass]

Personal real money success of any size or length of time can never validate the system. It's lunacy to think otherwise !

CHT,

I thank you for all your cooperation in this thread. But it seems like now you're here just to disqualify the strategy. If you no longer want to help, then theres no reason for you to remain in this thread. I need people who support the strategy with new ideas.

Thanks

[Andre Chass]

ita Andre

For this to work we need lots of positive energy.

This fascinates me for two reasons:

Vaddis' system was similar to
this (and no one could figure it out)

Andre is very close to doing so imo.

There was another system involving tracking 24 spins
and 12 numbers hitting once in the next 12 spins.

(no one could figure the missing pieces in that one either)

Hey Proof,

Vaddis' system? What's it?

Is Vaddis someone name?

[Andre Chass]

I just played for exactly 36 minutes using the strategy.
Profit of $45
Maximum progression 5 steps (1,1,2,3,4)

Not bad!

[Andre Chass]

Hi Andre, please check my PM.

I will check it out!

[cht]

CHT,

I thank you for all your cooperation in this thread. But it seems like now you're here just to disqualify the strategy. If you no longer want to help, then theres no reason for you to remain in this thread. I need people who support the strategy with new ideas.

Thanks

Again I'm not against your strategy, not Madi, not Denzie, not Steve. None of us posted here because we are against your strategy. There is no such thing as against or for someone.

I posted here because I believe your strategy to bet against unique is valid. My belief has grown stronger with the evidence I collected with the tests conducted.

You have a winning strategy, period. But you have to bet it optimally to realise this winning advantage. This is where we disagree.

You ask for help to improve your original idea, I gave this help. You mistook my help for attack because you fail to understand all that I have posted.

Now I am not surprise, I'm also certain that many lurkers on this thread do not understand what I wrote. I have grown wiser with real experience.

For the few of you who do understand, go make your money. I was in a generous mood to share this with you which I got from Andre himself.

So, if you want to thank someone thank Andre.

Andre, a big thank you sir for sharing a good idea.

May you continue to win always.

cht

[Andre Chass]

CHT

I respect you and your opinions. I respect all members of this forum. I really didnt understand everything you've posted, what you wrote. I wish have a cordial dialogue with you. If you can explain the modification you made to the strategy, I'd appreciate it.

Now I go to sleep. See you soon.

[Proofreaders2000]

Hey Proof,

Vaddis' system? What's it?

Is Vaddis someone name?

Here's Vaddi's System
link:://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache%3Ae6h0r_Asp3AJ%3A:.money-maker-machine.com%2Fforum%2Fgeneral-discussion%2Fwish-i-could-openly-share-roulette-grail%2F%3Faction%3Dprintpage+&cd=9&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk

[cht]

CHT

I respect you and your opinions. I respect all members of this forum. I really didnt understand everything you've posted, what you wrote. I wish have a cordial dialogue with you. If you can explain the modification you made to the strategy, I'd appreciate it.

Now I go to sleep. See you soon.

I don't take anything personal, I hope you or anyone else don't take my comments at personal level. If I mistakenly said something that offended you, I apologise it's not meant that way.

I can explain the modifications to the strategy.

But first we need RouletteBeater to do the test for us that I requested in post #196. This is the important missing info we need to validate the idea. I don't know the test results right now, I keep my fingers crossed that what I saw from the small probe test I conducted can be verified. If I'm wrong I will be open to admit my mistake.

RouletteBeater, pls make the test I requested on post #196. TQ

If you, RouletteBeater, Proofreader, 6th-sense and whoever else are interested combine our effort on this we can find the gold pot. Lets start with RB's test result, we will know from there.