Repeats Prog Method

[6th-sense]

Yes I think u need your idea testing too cht I understand what you are aiming at..you could lose 2 or more bankrolls from the off if you are unlucky way before you get ahead..test were shown as if you won on 1st spin to one loss...in a 1000 spins profit would vary depending on stage in progression .i have seen 23 unique numbers myself yesterday on William hill live casino I would rather risk the units your proposing even if waiting time is longer..on paper and rbs test look great but if it fails I wouldn’t want all that time and effort of playing for that length of time to go out of the window..less units to lose would be better.. method is great ..but units risked aren’t..no disrespect to anyone

[celescliff]

Basically days and weeks worth of spins is not significant. I won for around a year with a losing system, before I gave all and probably more back to the casino.

This. If you dont code or can't find anyone that can do this for you, you guys that test this will never find out if this will work or not.

An example of a system I created. It did good on manually testing and then I decided to code it and it did good at start before it went south.

I attach a graph of it. Even if it still in plus after 200k spins this is a loser because if i started playing after 100k spins I would never be in profit.

Make sure to test properly.

[cht]

This. If you dont code or can't find anyone that can do this for you, you guys that test this will never find out if this will work or not.

An example of a system I created. It did good on manually testing and then I decided to code it and it did good at start before it went south.

I attach a graph of it. Even if it still in plus after 200k spins this is a loser because if i started playing after 100k spins I would never be in profit.

Make sure to test properly.

celescliff, can you pls help make the test that I requested on post #196 including unique 20. TQ

[celescliff]

celescliff, can you pls help make the test that I requested on post #196 including unique 20. TQ

Sorry, but since I got my second child the little time I spend on the computer I only focus on me.

You can try contact normy2000 or spin_dizzy if they still around.

Good luck.

[cht]

Sorry, but since I got my second child the little time I spend on the computer I only focus on me.

You can try contact normy2000 or spin_dizzy if they still around.

Good luck.

I understand and appreciate your reply. TQ.

normy2000 do visit sometime but not active posting. spin_dizzy don't know if he's around. The other guy is Nickmsi if they are willing to help. Else it's end of the road.

[Roulettebeater]

May I make a request to test the following -
How many sequence per 100,000 spins for -
1. 12 unique
2. 13 unique
3. 14 unique
4. 15 unique
5. 16 unique
6. 17 unique
7. 18 unique
8. 19 unique

TQ for your help.

I ll do that for you

[cht]

I ll do that for you

TQ bro, lets work together on this. 

[Andre Chass]

I ll do that for you

Thanks, I'm waiting. You and I will work together. CHT will work with madi.

[Andre Chass]

I ll do that for you

RouletteBeater let's talk private.

I'll request to close this thread.

Don't post here the test that CHT hás requested.
CHT is cheating on me. Take a look at the other thread.

[Andre Chass]

RouletteBeater check your pm

CHT is stoling my idea to work with Madi.

Don't post the test results here.

[Andre Chass]

@steve

Can you delete my account and the thread, please?

[ego]

Andre Chass you have to take it more easy on your self and start ignore does who not has the same agenda as your self.
Is hard at the beginning but great freedom when you apply it - you get great mental strength.
Andre Chass i been around for many years and i would not hang around with all my mix feelings about some topics and members - if i not started to ignore does who has not the same agenda as my self.

I like to develop new ideas and play both online and in real casino and know you can win more then you lose among other things.
The funny thing Andre Chass is even when some one succes winning 30K playing the worse house edge and base the selection on gamblers fallacy - no sayers continue saying it can not be done - even when there is several winning reports from several gamblers the no sayers continue to argue.

So you have to take it for what it is - even if you succed and have a winning method they will continue to claim it can not be done and run a billion trails to see the system fail and say - you see it fail - but we all know all methods fail - but making for example 30K and bust and end up with 28K is no big deal - system fail and you still have won more then your bankroll is several times in a row.

So skip the garbage talk and continue with what you do and don't worry so much about others.
If you are sensetiv and care about what other say about you and your methods you will not last for long.
You need to learn who you talk to and who is your friend who want to discuss and furhter develop your ideas.
The other side and no sayers you just ignore there existing and there replys.

Cheers

[Roulettebeater]

What HG you gonna create next week ? Betting 1 number with a 400 step progression?  You just to dumb to understand people try help you .And no i dont kiss losers. Sorry

Then kiss Steve's ass, he is the only winner here

Im joking

Guys please calm down, like that we going nowhere

[ozon]

I have not read the entire topic.
Unfortunately, the first page is a reference to the simulation of 1.8 million spins.
If this simulation was true, all that remains is to create a bot that will play the casino rng.
The only problem is that  that  i  think the author did it on spins without a zero.
Because the speech is there about betvoyager.

[Andre Chass]

Andre Chass you have to take it more easy on your self and start ignore does who not has the same agenda as your self.
Is hard at the beginning but great freedom when you apply it - you get great mental strength.
Andre Chass i been around for many years and i would not hang around with all my mix feelings about some topics and members - if i not started to ignore does who has not the same agenda as my self.

I like to develop new ideas and play both online and in real casino and know you can win more then you lose among other things.
The funny thing Andre Chass is even when some one succes winning 30K playing the worse house edge and base the selection on gamblers fallacy - no sayers continue saying it can not be done - even when there is several winning reports from several gamblers the no sayers continue to argue.

So you have to take it for what it is - even if you succed and have a winning method they will continue to claim it can not be done and run a billion trails to see the system fail and say - you see it fail - but we all know all methods fail - but making for example 30K and bust and end up with 28K is no big deal - system fail and you still have won more then your bankroll is several times in a row.

So skip the garbage talk and continue with what you do and don't worry so much about others.
If you are sensetiv and care about what other say about you and your methods you will not last for long.
You need to learn who you talk to and who is your friend who want to discuss and furhter develop your ideas.
The other side and no sayers you just ignore there existing and there replys.

Cheers

Ego,

Thanks for the advice! Youre a nice guy.

I'll ignore those *XXX*  who think they're "experts". They think they own the truth. I will be back to the topic and try to improve the strategy with new ideas and I ask for support to those interested in this method.

(modified by mod)