What works and what doesnt??

[denzie]

Let him play. He ll move on time like his previous rare patten sector.

You read my mind 

[Madi]

RPRO75
Guest
May 15, 2009, 05:52:51 PM
     This is a simple system based on repeating numbers.  It is a progressive system so it may not be for everyone.  The only way you can lose with this system is if one of the first 8 numbers does not repeat in 24 spins.  Now, you may not always be able to bet, but when you can, I think you have a great chance of winning this bet.

System Rules

1. You must track 8 spins.  In order to be able to use these spins for this system, there must be no repeaters in those 8 spins.  (In other words, 8 unique numbers).

2.  You then wait for 4 more spins, again, none of these can be repeaters.  You must now have a total of 12 spins with no repeaters.

3.  You will now bet the first 8 numbers you tracked with this 12 step progression: 1,1,1,1,2,2,3,5,5,7,9,12.

     So far, and I know it's early, I have been having good results.  It takes patience, because it is not always easy to get 12 numbers with no repeater.  If you are tracking and you encounter a repeater, stop.  Begin again and the next spin will be your first spin to track.  Basically, you need a string of 12 unique numbers to bet.  You will only lose if 24 unique numbers spin up in a row.  If you lose the progression, you will lose 389 units (ouch!).  Therefore, I recommend playing with no larger than $.25 units.  A bankroll of 800 units ($200.00) is recommended.  It will be a larger or smaller amount of money depending on which size unit you choose.

[Madi]

Please read the thread.

I wait for 12 uniques and bet them.

Step 1: bet 12 uniques. If no hit add the last number shown.
Step 2: bet 13 uniques. If no hit add the last number shown.
Step 3: bet 14 uniques. If no hit add the last number shown.
Step 4: bet 15 uniques. If no hit add the last number shown.
And so on...

I'm testing it playing real money. I know a table that allows 30 cents minimum bets.

I'm using a progression of 8 steps 1,1,2,3,4,6,9,14.


And this is the copied one for comparing

[Madi]

RPRO75
Guest
May 16, 2009, 02:02:30 AM
Here is a really great way to play this:

1. Track spins until you get 12 unique numbers.  If a number repeats, just count it once, you are looking for 12 different numbers.

2.  After you get your 12 numbers, bet them for four spins only using this progression: 1,1,2,3. 

This is just another variation to play repeats but this one seems a little safer (the other was safe too, but this is better).

[Madi]

*
ANDRE CHASS
783
Quote (selected)
Track spins until you get 12 unique numbers.  If a number repeats, just count it once, you are looking for 12 different numbers.

After you get your 12 numbers, bet them for four spins only using this progression: 1,1,2,3.

[cht]

Hey CHT, That's it you want to do? A new thread with madi?

Ok. 

Andre, the only reason for me to open a new thread is to share and discuss a method that is far different from your 12 unique bet 8 steps martingale method.

It deserves a new thread because -

1. The betselection is different from your bet 8 steps after 12 unique,

2. The bet sizing is different from your 8 steps martingale.

Madi ask a question I answered him. Up to that point I have zero thought to open a new thread. I still don't have any intention to open a new thread at this point in time.

And yes your initial idea to bet 8 continuous times with your betsizing and your call for help led me to explore this topic more in-depth where I stumbled upon this opportunity. I have repeatedly acknowledged this fact in my posts made on your thread.

I do not consider ideas that spawn off an initial idea as a steal. And no I do not agree     
that I have to require formal permission from you to open a new thread about this although out of courtesy I will inform you about it with the reasons to do so.

However, I think such threads should acknowledge the source where possible.

I respond to your post to share my views about threads that spawn from an initial thread idea. You can be rest assured this supposed new thread by me will not happen.

Another point I wish to address is about your call for help to contribute towards your idea.

I only make post based on facts and reality. I call a spade a spade and when I do that I provide as much evidence to back up why I say that. You reserve that right to disagree.

I do that because by my participation in the on-going discussion I feel responsible not to propagate misleading false info or claims on forums. I will not be a party to that.

For you Andre as OP, you have every right to tell any poster not to discuss any matter that you are not comfortable with on your thread including disallowing certain poster from participation on your thread. You just has to express that in clear language.

[Madi]

Good news that its bavk

[cht]

What works ?

These methods work itlr, the more you play the more you win. There's no superstitious start or end time or any nonsense like that.

1. Denzie's eyes on wheel and ball,

2. TG's hotties, and

3. Fx TA

cht

PS. I'm done with testing.
PPS. Thanks steve for a forum that benefits me. TQ.

[Madi]

At last. Best of luck . I believe it saves ur years of time.

[cht]

At last. Best of luck . I believe it saves ur years of time.

Thanks madi.

Follow my trail, it'll save you time as well.

Best wishes to you that you find what you are looking for. TC.