• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Odds and payouts are different things. If either the odds or payouts don't change, then the result is the same - eventual loss.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

What works and what doesnt??

Started by Madi, Dec 29, 05:13 PM 2017

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Madi

Dont worry. He knows what actually work and thats why he can say what doesnt work without testing.

Proofreaders2000

I'll tell you what doesn't work.  Discounting anyone's ideas. 
Everyone has something to contribute.

Sure a lot of what's presented here is rehash-but you
never know that 'Golden Nugget' hidden in plain sight.

cht

Quote from: Proofreaders2000 on Jan 05, 12:19 AM 2018
I'll tell you what doesn't work.  Discounting anyone's ideas. 
Everyone has something to contribute.

Sure a lot of what's presented here is rehash-but you
never know that 'Golden Nugget' hidden in plain sight.
I agree Proofreader. Never discount ideas even from the dumb. That's the purpose to be on this forum.

But, if you do not remove the dross it remains just rust.

Proofreaders2000

If you take the dross and the rust and shape it the
right way it becomes a masterpiece sold for millions...

No dumb ideas, just flow with it.

cht

Quote from: Proofreaders2000 on Jan 05, 12:32 AM 2018
If you take the dross and the rust and shape it the
right way it becomes a masterpiece sold for millions...

No dumb ideas, just flow with it.
I believe we are in agreement of the mind.

In my brief 7month membership, I have found 2 masterpiece from this forum, the latest is the recent idea from Andre. The other is from Denzie. I thank both of them for generously sharing their ideas with strangers on the web. I'm not surprise that there are more if anyone cares to do the work honestly and carefully.

Madi

Guys,

12 unique then a 8 step marti?

You guys want to test this?
You guys saying is it a good or bad idea??
Improvement can be done where there is scope. Variation is not improvent. Selection is improvement.

Its a clear failure  as denzie said. I agree totally. Let him play. He ll move on time like his previous rare patten sector.

cht

Quote from: Madi on Jan 05, 03:12 AM 2018
12 unique then a 8 step marti?
12 unique then a 8 step marti is a LOSER.

Quote from: Madi on Jan 05, 03:12 AM 2018
Improvement can be done where there is scope. Variation is not improvent. Selection is improvement.
Improvement is based on selection. This can only be proven by empirical evidence. For now, my small probe test shows positive expectancy. A full scale large sample test can validate or invalidate my observation. I await RouletteBeater or anyone competent with RX coding to provide the test results I requested to come to a proper conclusion.

At this stage everything else is pure speculation.

Proofreaders2000

I'm not going to judge Andre. 
I'm also in the 'system business'.

Personally I don't think 8 steps is long
enough.  12 steps is my preference atm.

Right now imo the Grail may
be an Even Chance bet selection.

It would be wonderful if the system did
not require a Marti, but not opposed to one.

Madi

No. I m not against any person. I am against the system designed and claimed by him as it wins more than lose which he is calling a fact.

Cht
Get a new thread with ur one which is inspired by andre. Lets see and discuss

cht

Quote from: Madi on Jan 05, 03:50 AM 2018Get a new thread with ur one which is inspired by andre. Lets see and discuss
Only if we can find a competent coder to make the test as I requested on post #196, my probe test observation is pure speculation, nothing more to it as in another silly wild goose chase wasting everybodys time.

I could be completely wrong being misguided by the small sample.

Andre Chass

Quote from: Madi on Jan 05, 03:50 AM 2018
No. I m not against any person. I am against the system designed and claimed by him as it wins more than lose which he is calling a fact.

Cht
Get a new thread with ur one which is inspired by andre. Lets see and discuss



Oh, a new thread! :thumbsup:

Madi, I respect you but keep away from me, please.

I know you don't like me, so I don't have nothing to talk to you. All you do is talking shit about me.

Nothing ventured, nothing gained...

Andre Chass

Quote from: cht on Jan 05, 04:19 AM 2018
Only if we can find a competent coder to make the test as I requested on post #196, my probe test observation is pure speculation, nothing more to it as in another silly wild goose chase wasting everybodys time.

I could be completely wrong being misguided by the small sample.

Hey CHT, That's it you want to do? A new thread with madi?

Ok.  :thumbsup:
Nothing ventured, nothing gained...

Andre Chass

Quote from: cht on Jan 05, 12:47 AM 2018
In my brief 7month membership, I have found 2 masterpiece from this forum, the latest is the recent idea from Andre. The other is from Denzie. I thank both of them for generously sharing their ideas with strangers.

Thanks for sharing?

And now you're open your new thread with Madi?

Give me break
Nothing ventured, nothing gained...

Roulettebeater

Madi, may you please remind us of your contributions in this forums ?
Have you ever came with any worthy idea during your memberships lifetime in this forum ?

Please be constructive, Kind and if you got used to object everything then you should think of that again !
A dollar won is twice as sweet as as a dollar earned

denzie

As spins roll off our predictions get better

-