Precognition really works

[swanson]

Oh yes it does...link:s://roulette-simulator.info/en/game/1b82288c468241437816676eaef893ee

First, I'll start with something positive. What you did on this simulation is extremely impressive. 

Why does it say 365 resets on link:s://roulette-simulator.info/en/game/1b82288c468241437816676eaef893ee ? What does that mean? Also, why do you use different accounts on MPR and not the same one to demonstrate that you can consistently win in the long run? I don't want to be that person that says, it's not enough spins, because 965 spins is ALOT (on your roulette simulation).

Outside the box methods have the highest shot of working.  Physics has a low shot. Systems have no shot.

[precogmiles]

First, I'll start with something positive. What you did on this simulation is extremely impressive. 

Why does it say 365 resets on link:s://roulette-simulator.info/en/game/1b82288c468241437816676eaef893ee ? What does that mean? Also, why do you use different accounts on MPR and not the same one to demonstrate that you can consistently win in the long run? I don't want to be that person that says, it's not enough spins, because 965 spins is ALOT (on your roulette simulation).

Outside the box methods have the highest shot of working.  Physics has a low shot. Systems have no shot.

Thank you and these are all reasonable questions.

1. Why does it 365 resets?
This is because I use these accounts as a practice ground. I have done many reset on that account, so that I can test out different methods. I use RS mainly because it gives a history of your game play. Since I try out different methods to see which method has the best impact I record my data for those games on a spreadsheet before I reset the game to test something else. I mainly keep my accounts on private, and I will be putting that account on private again soon.

2.Why do you use different accounts on MPR?
This is again similar to the first answer. MPR does not have a reset feature, so I am forced to create different accounts to test different ideas.


The best way to explain it is like this. Imagine you are learning to draw. To improve you have to practice, that means you will have practiced using  many pencils, many drawing pads, many canvases, etc.. And will produce many works of art initially while you improve your skill.

Another example is a carpenter, as you learn carpentry you will go through many blocks of wood, many chisels, etc..

Do you not believe it is wrong to judge an experienced carpenter by the works he did when he was an apprentice? Or judge the artist by works when they were novices?

The reality is as the years have gone on I have definitely improved. I feel it, and my results demonstrate it.

You are right, precog and physics ate the only ways to win roulette.

[Steeefan2014]

Oh yes it does...
link:s://roulette-simulator.info/en/game/1b82288c468241437816676eaef893ee

I had a feeling that in the morning, when I start playing, if I bet 200times the number 10, it might hit. Yaaay, it did! After 150spins! But it did!

"Precognition really works"

[precogmiles]

I had a feeling that in the morning, when I start playing, if I bet 200times the number 10, it might hit. Yaaay, it did! After 150spins! But it did!

"Precognition really works"

link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=26595.0

"Casinos are stupid, systems work"

[Steeefan2014]

link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=26595.0

"Casinos are stupid, systems work"

Precog, I got nothing against you. But playing for free (MPR, RS) is simply BS! Put your money where your mouth is and after that you come and preach about HG! Until then.........

[precogmiles]

Precog, I got nothing against you. But playing for free (MPR, RS) is simply BS! Put your money where your mouth is and after that you come and preach about HG! Until then.........

I have nothing against anyone either.

If we take the approach that the only evidence is when someone shows you pictures of money and fancy watches then there is no real value in evidence.

How would pictures with luxury items be evidence of a winning method?

Many scammers earn money from suckers who buy their fake 'winning' systems. They then show a few videos of winning streaks online and they claim to have the HG. More suckers see the video and pay for the fake system, and the cycle continues. These scammers will show you all the fancy watches you want. How is this evidence?

Being a system junkie is an illness you must first understand it is an addiction. There is no get rich quick scheme in gambling.

Precognition is bigger than gambling or roulette. I came to this forum because of the remote viewing thread not to gamble or get rich quick.

I don't care who believes precognition works. I use MPR and RS to practice and improve, it is evidence enough for me.

[Steeefan2014]

Many scammers earn money from suckers who buy their fake 'winning' systems. They then show a few videos of winning streaks online and they claim to have the HG. More suckers see the video and pay for the fake system, and the cycle continues. These scammers will show you all the fancy watches you want.

I totally agree with you on this one! And I also think that a strategy that doesn't involve thinking is set to fail sooner or later. You have to adapt to the way the wheel is going.
Using MPR or RS for practicing and improving is one thing. Using MPR or RS and bragging that you have an HG... is a completely different thing! Close to stupid...

[precogmiles]

I totally agree with you on this one! And I also think that a strategy that doesn't involve thinking is set to fail sooner or later. You have to adapt to the way the wheel is going.
Using MPR or RS for practicing and improving is one thing. Using MPR or RS and bragging that you have an HG... is a completely different thing! Close to stupid...

Ok out of curiosity;

1. What would a holy grail look like to you? Mechanical? Physics? Precog?

2. How would someone demonstrate a holy grail?

3. How could you verify it was a holy grail?


Just to be clear I don't really care about the holy grail, I only mention it because of system junkies.

[Steeefan2014]

Ok out of curiosity;

1. What would a holy grail look like to you? Mechanical? Physics? Precog?

2. How would someone demonstrate a holy grail?

3. How could you verify it was a holy grail?


Just to be clear I don't really care about the holy grail, I only mention it because of system junkies.

I truly think that before I answer your question, there is another question that is more important than any other: What defines a HG??

But  to answer yours though:

1. The closest one to HG is physics
2. Impossible with a system that can be coded or applied repeatedely
3. By constant wins, no matter what the wheel spins are.

[precogmiles]

I truly think that before I answer your question, there is another question that is more important than any other: What defines a HG??

But  to answer yours though:

1. The closest one to HG is physics
2. Impossible with a system that can be coded or applied repeatedely
3. By constant wins, no matter what the wheel spins are.

Good question. I have no idea what defines a holy grail. I read it being used by system junkies and I mostly use it in a sarcastic or flippant way.

If a holy grail is a method that gives you a consistant edge then precognition and physics are the exactly that.

I agree with the answer for point 2. But that only applies for a system player. What about for precog or physics?

[Steeefan2014]

I agree with the answer for point 2. But that only applies for a system player. What about for precog or physics?

What about them?

If a holy grail is a method that gives you a consistant edge then precognition and physics are the exactly that.

There are others too. But it involves a little bit of thinking! And sometimes... this is really hard!

[precogmiles]

What about them?

How do you expect them to demonstrate a holy grail?

[Joe]

I had a feeling that in the morning, when I start playing, if I bet 200times the number 10, it might hit. Yaaay, it did! After 150spins! But it did!

"Precognition really works"

lol. But I have to admit that I'm not quite so dismissive of precognition as I used to be, because since I started experimenting with it, I'm seeing a small edge. Still quite early days though. But as I mentioned in another thread, if you don't know why your method works, there will always be some doubt about it, and I can't sign up to all the metaphysical baggage which comes with accepting precognition because I haven't seen enough data yet. 'Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence'.

[precogmiles]

lol. But I have to admit that I'm not quite so dismissive of precognition as I used to be, because since I started experimenting with it, I'm seeing a small edge. Still quite early days though. But as I mentioned in another thread, if you don't know why your method works, there will always be some doubt about it, and I can't sign up to all the metaphysical baggage which comes with accepting precognition because I haven't seen enough data yet. 'Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence'.

Hypothetically, if you continued to see that small edge grow the more you practiced it, would you being to believe it was a real phenomena?

Or would you still want confirmation from the scientific community?

[Joe]

No, I don't need any confirmation from the scientific community, that wouldn't be a true scientific attitude. Science shouldn't be about consensus (although unfortunately it seems that way in some fields these days). But I would need great results over a large number of bets to convince me.

I do believe most of what science tells us, not because I have blind faith, but because like most of us, I don't have the time or knowledge to investigate for myself, and science has completely transformed our lives in the last 2 or 3 centuries so it has a great track record. Why would anyone want to dismiss it?