DOUBLE DOZEN.

[denzie]

Denzie a system doesnt have to hold up for 1 million spins. Heres the thing. And I make this same argument for PB. Guys like you worry about something failing thirty years down the road. If im still alive in 30 years. PB will have made me so much money it wouldnt matter.

Can you understand this?

Even if PB falls apart five years from now. I will have made over 200k from it by then. And I will show any doubting thomas's. So it will have served its purpose.

However if its business as usual 5 years from now. Which im extremely confident it will be. I will continue to use it.

Guys who sit around saying WHAT IF this what if that. Dont get very far in life.

I dont know how much money will have to be made before the doubters say. Hey maybe this game can be beaten by a mechanical system. At least in a mans lifetime. But we shall see.

Here's the thing....if a system works over millions of spins....then we all win. Yup.

Now...if the system dont win then only a few will win. You understand this ?

Meaning some one can start playing and lose right away. But he might think...lets keep going coz the others doing great. And he will lose more and more. ( even if played in small games)
Some will win few months...raise the chips...And....Yup. etc.

So im 100% sure it loses. But i wont argue that its a Nice system. I just tell the people to be carefull. Thats it.

Even a stupid marty can win a lifetime for some. But most will lose. Once again...dont get me twisted...I wish you guys win. And win a lot 

[Tinsoldiers]

But most will lose.

Most of the time there is no need to test at all. Just by looking you can tell it will lose.

[cht]

Most of the time there is no need to test at all. Just by looking you can tell it will lose.

It took me losing a lot of money to learn that skill. 

[winkel]

Single-Dozen-System, Double-Dozen-System, ...

Can we expect a winning Triple-Dozen-strategy as well?

[Apolloo]

Single-Dozen-System, Double-Dozen-System, ...

Can we expect a winning Triple-Dozen-strategy as well?

Haha well maybe...

Wait until we see 5 dozens or columns hit the furthest back... Not hit the last 2 dozens 5 times.
Then bet for that repeat of any of the last 2 dozens to come 1-1,3-3,9-9

Got to see this to lose.

A
C
B
A
C * trigger
B
A
C
B

[Apolloo]

Need 71 units to play all three systems at once. I think its not a bad hit and run. But most likely just be a matter of time until hit the losses.

[seykid31]

Wait for a dozen or column to hit 4 times in a row bet once for it to break its run. Progression
1-1 = +1
4-4. = +2
15-15 = +5

LOSS (-40)


EXAMPLE....

12
16
33*
34*
26*
34* < bet 1-1 units on dozen A+B
36 LOSS -2
31
1
20
4
9,*
18*
27*
33* < Bet 4-4 on column A+B
7. Win +4

Iv had very good results so far on testing. LLL (-40u) is rare.


(Test results on the thread "good results so far??) > link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=19942.0


Thanks

12
16
33 +1
34 +2
26 +3
34 +4
36 +5
31 +6
1 +4
20 +5
4 +6
9 +7
18 +5
27 +6
33 +7
7 +5

Flat bet

Im just trying Double dozens with those spins.

The method cam be worked out I figured.
Based on 'movement and trapping'

[seykid31]

12
16
33 +1
34 +2
26 +3
34 +4
36 +5
31 +6
1 +4
20 +5
4 +6
9 +7
18 +5
27 +6
33 +7
7 +5

Flat bet

Im just trying Double dozens with those spins.

The method can be worked out I figured.
Based on 'movement and trapping'

[atlantis]

Certainly Flatbetting 1-1 each time - it *might* be OK.

Apolloo' s results W/L

LWWWW  +2

WWWL     +1 

WWWW    +4

LLWW       -2

LWW          +0

WWWLLWW  +1

WWL            +0

WWL            +0

WLW            +0

WWL            +0

WWWLW      +2 

W                  +1

LWWW          +1

WLWWLWW   +1 

WWWLW        +2

LWWWWW     +3 

WWWWLL        +0

WWWWW         +5

LLWWWW        +0 


TOTAL = +21
flatbetting 1-1 each time


A.

[seykid31]

Certainly Flatbetting 1-1 each time - it *might* be OK.

Apolloo' s results W/L

LWWWW  +2

WWWL     +1 

WWWW    +4

LLWW       -2

LWW          +0

WWWLLWW  +1

WWL            +0

WWL            +0

WLW            +0

WWL            +0

WWWLW      +2 

W                  +1

LWWW          +1

WLWWLWW   +1 

WWWLW        +2

LWWWWW     +3 

WWWWLL        +0

WWWWW         +5

LLWWWW        +0 


TOTAL = +21
flatbetting 1-1 each time


A.

You are playing these spins?

[Rewster88]

i have tested this long time ago on  youroul . com ----    called the Sphinx system. (just search Sphinx)  Results are not so good. See it yourself.



R