Brainstorming LOTT

[Bigbroben]

Thanks,
this is what I wanted.
Where did you get these value from?

[Herby]

These are calculated values:

probabilities for:
repeat 2 spin: 1./37.
repeat 3. spin: 36./37. * 2./37.
repeat 4. spin: 36./37. * 35./37. * 3./37.
repeat 5. spin: 36./37. * 35./37. * 34./37. * 4./37.   etc

I hope you see the pattern ... 

[Bigbroben]

Ok,
these are maths.  What about stats?

[bigmoney]

following

[Irish88]

Ok,
these are maths.  What about stats?

Can you use statistics to use to your advantage in roulette? I think this is the idea in 6th back to basics thread.

12 unique
12 repeats
12/13 unhits

These are the averages. 6th asked how we can use statistics to our advantage. If you look at the blocks from left to right in a 37 spin cycle you usually have 8-12 blocks. Let’s say you have 8 blocks of numbers. The average length of numbers will be three numbers then an unhit. The average block of an unhit is 1 I believe.

For example 7,8,9 hit. 10 is unhit. Is this how to use statistics to our advantage? Doubles can either be repeaters or two numbers connected. Pairs. Pairs or repeaters is 2…..eventually they have to become 3 most of the time.

[Bigbroben]

Well,

turns out no matter what the stats are saying, on the short term, like before every single spin, there is one number that is changing the odds to negative.

No matter what.

[Blueprint]

Stats from today...

Spin singles with repeats in the first half of Line Position stream... 71%
Spin singles with repeats in the first half of Street Position stream... 95%

Useless though, right.

[Toimeme]

Bigbro, what about your system repeats ?
It dosen't work?

[D1]

Not useless at all.
The problem is finding the correct way to take advantage of it.

[Blueprint]

Today's game, 83% and 96%

[Blueprint]

The problem is finding the correct way to take advantage of it.

Exactly.  So, it's USE-less.

[D1]

Ok I see your point.

[Blueprint]

I'm sure there is a way it's just that no one here has it

Aside from use-less, I'm working with loss-less.... perhaps that's enough to Win-more.

[winkel]

I'm sure there is a way it's just that no one here has it

You are wrong. I know at least one who got it.

[Blueprint]

You are wrong. I know at least one who got it.

👍🏻