Add-up test

[Bigbroben]

I dunno what to think of this:

just tried this way: put one unit every spin on every number that came out, even if repeating.   So if out: 23,5,19,6,32, there would be 1u on 32, 2u on 6, 3u on 19, 4u on 5, 5u on 23.

Good thing: unhits don't get bet on, repeaters get hit with more and more units on them.
Not good thing: 1x hitters get betted on and produce deficit; bets get high further down the road (69x, 68x, 54x,...)

I still don't know if sustainable on the long run.  Decided to check first at spin 72.  The attached graph inspired me this checkpoint

Reached spin 73, where I am now thinking what to do next.
This method is not yet enhanced, tweaked, worked on, just basic +1 every spin every hitted nr.

Performed 1 game, see attached.  It's looking good, still don't know if lucky or trendy.

[Bigbroben]

Here are some more samples:

Addup2:
tough game, very few repeaters in the beginning and the ones hitting were later in the game, so fewer units on them.  Longer time in red but a little positive run at spins 60s.

Addup3:
raised on numbers only if the ball landed on  new nr.  Lower stakes all over hitted nr, less costly if landed on unhit.  Once again this higher peak at spins 73.
Just for the heck of it, continued the game until all nr landed.  Surprisingly, highest balance is about at spin 73...  dunno if coincidence or not.  See addup4.

Ideas? Comments?

[holymoly]

How about betting the same number
for 37 spins (703 units required
Adding 1 unit after every spin
Even hitting on the 37th spin will make 600+ profit

Choosing the number eg..
Wait for 2 repeaters,your fav number,etc.. random...?

[6th-sense]

I tried it last week and made a handwritten chart was good till the losses outweighs the wins but I may retry on 3rd repeaters onwards as nottys charts show that they are most likely to hit
Also noticed on spin 36 it adds up to 666

[Bigbroben]

Modified version:

this one seems more rational, stake-wise and accuracy-wise.

Added one unit where the ball landed, simply.  Naturally, non-hits get nothing, 1x only one and repeaters get more as they come by.

Some more tests to go...

[Bigbroben]

At spin 112:

[Bigbroben]

At spin 149 (4x37):

Seems optimal nr spins is, again, around 70s, so +/-2cycles.
Will run more tests, maybe restart at new br high...

To be cont'd!

[Bigbroben]

Second try:
many repeaters at first, no real hot nr later in the game to compensate for all other bets.  Negative in the second half.

Will try with a reset at new br high..

[Bigbroben]

Reset at new br high:

[Bigbroben]

So far so good...
Not as spectacular but safer, stakes stay under control.

[daveylibra]

Hi BigBroBen

This system looks good, but just one point, how is it that "stakes stay under control?"
Surely stakes increase every bet, so after say, 70 spins, we have 70 units on the table?
Also, I have tested various other systems, whereby about 50% graphs go +,  50% -.
It would be good if you could run 100 or so tests on a simulator (maybe that's what you are doing)

best of luck
Dave

[Bigbroben]

Slowly but surely.
I like it.

[Bigbroben]

Hi BigBroBen

This system looks good, but just one point, how is it that "stakes stay under control?"
Surely stakes increase every bet, so after say, 70 spins, we have 70 units on the table?
Also, I have tested various other systems, whereby about 50% graphs go +,  50% -.
It would be good if you could run 100 or so tests on a simulator (maybe that's what you are doing)

best of luck
Dave

If reset all stakes after new br, then stakes don't go that high.  If no reset, the bets get high, so go the winnings, but it makes more money vulnerable to long runs of not so hot numbers.
Actually, more than 50% of new highs come within the 8th spin.  If it comes further, 2-3 hits on erpeaters on a hit on a 3xrepeater takes it to new high.
I'd say my stop-loss would be at -300 (1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+...+24), so, hardly any repeaters in 24 spins, which is rather rare.

I do not have time or expertise to run 100s of runs, perhaps someone here could.  I'll just proceed with this game until losing 24 times in a row, or until I have to change a diaper on a kid...

[nottophammer]

Surely stakes increase every bet, so after say, 70 spins, we have 70 units on the table?

So 70th spin you laid 70 units on the table, thats 2485 units used if placing 1 unit every spin, its the soft prog 1,2,3,4,5 as by now some #'s will be having 2,3,4 or 5 units placed

2485/36=69.02 wins, so you need the hot #'s to be repeating fast

37 spins is 703 units and needs 20 wins at return of 36 yes 35+1, obviously earlier the repeats happen earlier you reset, is that right

[Bigbroben]

Got this one run with 81 spins before new high.  I am surprised how it recovered quickly...