Latest discussion on repeaters(GF)

[Steve]

told you before you are making too many assumptions....

What assumptions? My primary school math being correct?

Don't be vague if you want a discussion.

[psimoes]

You didn' t get my point. I'll try to make it clear later.

[Steve]

If you're talking about statistical balance, you cannot use that at all.

[psimoes]

Exactly. The point I'm trying to make is not optimistic at all.
In short samples, the clusters in random distribution delude players into thinking they got an edge. They don't. We use probability to determine if a method is viable. It never does and it's not probability's fault. All systems fail.

[Nimo]

Why argue?  Repeaters happen, they do become threepeats at some point, and the odds are still 1/37.  Playing repeaters that become threepeats gives you at least a starting point  of a possible bet selection.  That combined with a dynamic progression that changes as numbers are added, and then quit session once in profit makes for decent system.  The key here is the progression must change on everybet, and you stop the session and restart once in profit.  At 10 cent units, an easy $50 per hour without requiring a huge bankroll.

[ZERO]

Why argue?  Repeaters happen, they do become threepeats at some point, and the odds are still 1/37.  Playing repeaters that become threepeats gives you at least a starting point  of a possible bet selection. That combined with a dynamic progression that changes as numbers are added, and then quit session once in profit makes for decent system.  The key here is the progression must change on everybet, and you stop the session and restart once in profit.  At 10 cent units, an easy $50 per hour without requiring a huge bankroll.

AWESOME post Nimo! 

We all know the facts and understand the math (I hope) but yet we are all still here for exactly the reason you mentioned: working together to at least find a starting point for possible bet selection...

[Proofreaders2000]

bump

[Bigbroben]

bump

Probably Tourette...

[psimoes]

Speaking for myself, I'm still a systems aficcionado. The HG doesn't exist, but MAYBE there's something that "beats random in its own game" , as JL likes to put it. In practice that would reduce Probability Theory to what it really is: a theory. I know it's a neverending quest, but who cares.

[psimoes]

And I'll have to remind, my previous ramblings on repeaters were all in regards to flat betting.
I've tried positive progressions in the past. They work well when they work.

[Roulettebeater]

The HG doesn't exist.

The HG exists !
And I have no mood to argue with you on that !

[Bigbroben]

The HG exists !
And I have no mood to argue with you on that !

''The car that never gets an accident exists!''
''Does not!''

Depends on the driver....

[Roulettebeater]

''The car that never gets an accident exists!''
''Does not!''

Depends on the driver....

I agree.
Some drivers blame the car !

[Lucky7Red]

In practice that would reduce Probability Theory to what it really is: a theory.

"Probability Theory" I have better theory " Chaos Theory"

[psimoes]

The HG exists !
And I have no mood to argue with you on that !

The HG exists and you created it. I know, I've seen your results.

I've got some savings. How much do you need?
I hope 7.000 euros is OK.