Latest discussion on repeaters(GF)

[psimoes]

You mean a number hitting three times in a row? The odds are 1370 to 1, a bit higher than 1296 units.

Sorry, that´s the odds for two times in a row. For three times in a row it´s 1370*37 to 1. Around 50.000 to 1 or something

[Moxy]

It's really simple. The whole foundation of Turbos system is repeaters have a higher chance of spinning sometime soon. The argument is rubbish and easily refuted. No odds change = negative expectation with or without progression. Case closed.

If you want to waste more time, you can pull apart his other arguments too as I and others already have. Parx is clearly rigged, and even if RS's spins are acceptable, the limits clearly are not hence the many big winners. This whole turbo thing is a dead end.

Boy, you sure like to waste your time.

[Steve]

Boy, you sure like to waste your time.

Yeah its a bad habit. But other people around are far worse. 

[nottophammer]

even if RS's spins are acceptable, the limits clearly are not hence the many big winners.

Steve, i set BR, time to MPR settings, R-sim meets the LOTT that turbo said of  and the DSAA arsehole as well.
So with settings as yours why should result be any different, especially as it dont crash like just now, me Maestro did laugh we could here all your bla,bla,

Anyway i'll put the stevie wonder glasses on so i dont see the bla,bla. What ya gunna say steve blind leading the blind

[Steve]

Notto, you are thick and need to learn primary school math.

[maestro]

This whole turbo thing is a dead end.

you do not know that...how can you claim something when you do not have all the info...this is same like your math not very good...
just you got to understand that some people can do it and win some cannot....

[Steve]

you do not know that

Yes I do

how can you claim something when you do not have all the info

I have all I need, and more. I already explained it. Obviously you dont understand it.

this is same like your math not very good

I'm not sure I'm the one misunderstanding basic arithmetic.

just you got to understand that some people can do it and win some cannot

Yes, Mr 0.97 win rate, some people are all talk.

[Moxy]

Yeah its a bad habit. But other people around are far worse. 

No doubt.  Quite an inordinate amount for a guy such as you.

[maestro]

I have all I need

what you think is needed....

[Steve]

No doubt.  Quite an inordinate amount for a guy such as you.

It comes from a combination of trying to help, and frustration with people who cant understand really, really basic things and think I have the problem.

what you think is needed....

No Maestro. I'll give one example. You probably wont understand it.

I can test billions of spins to see if any repeating number has any higher chance of spinning more than another number. The result is repeaters have the same occurrence as cold numbers.

So WHY choose "repeaters"? There is no benefit. The odds have not changed. They are still 1 in 37.

Then Turbo says he beats a RANDOM GAME WITH MATH, and that he beats it because it's random as expected. That's a real dumb thing to say. Random means 1 in 37. The math is 1 in 37. He is saying he can win because he cant win.

Do you get it now? I doubt it.

I could go on about many points, but you struggle even with the basic ones.

[Steve]

I don't mean to come across and condescending and brash. But FFS what else can you do when very basic things are not being understood?

If I sound too sure of myself, it's because I understand really basic math and logic.

[Lucky7Red]

At least Steve is right, you can not change the odds in roulette, what ever you do odds remains the same, so how to doit then 

[psimoes]

Re: random is 1/37, the math is 1/37...
I'm sure you didn't mean it, but the way you put it is not accurate.
The probability of a straightup to hit is 1/37. Random distribution though
makes it appear from 1/1 to 1/300+ in the case of back to back hits and sleepers, respectively.
In the long run math shows all the straights end up appearing in equal amounts, proving the probability is right. We now use probability as a tool to determine the viability of a method.

[maestro]

Do you get it now? I doubt it.

told you before you are making too many assumptions....

[Steve]

Re: random is 1/37, the math is 1/37...
I'm sure you didn't mean it, but the way you put it is not accurate.
The probability of a straightup to hit is 1/37. Random distribution though
makes it appear from 1/1 to 1/300+ in the case of back to back hits and sleepers, respectively.
In the long run math shows all the straights end up appearing in equal amounts, proving the probability is right. We now use probability as a tool to determine the viability of a method.

You are talking statistics. No matter how many numbers you string together in a sequence, the odds of the next number are still 1 in 37. What you said is irrelevant.

The odds of any sequence have the same odds, including 0,0,0 or 32,8,13