Latest discussion on repeaters(GF)

[Steve]

Amusing. Within minutes of my morning post, Ken responded on GF. Does he just keep clicking refresh?

Ken, you are really pathetic. Nothing you say is correct. The court case I've been involved with are:

1. Vince Brandt: Vince simply didn’t understand instructions to access my system’s software, so absurdly claimed it didn’t exist. Vince was extremely rude and vile in his emails to me, so I asked him to hire a mediator.  That way I didn’t need to put up with his abuse. So he did, and that’s what the case was. In the mediation, he couldn’t swear at me and I agreed to giving a refund because he never even used my software. Case closed.

2. Vince Brandt, round 2: Almost all of Vince's claims were rejected, so he started another case. It was a joke and I didn't even attend the hearing. His case was dismissed as below:



3. Miro Zirdum's harassment and stalking: This was one case in two parts. I took him to court because of his pathetic behavior. The first judge said although his behavior was unacceptable and I was right to complain, it was not serious enough to lay criminal charges. I then spoke to Miro and his sister personally, and he promised to behave. Then after I published public test results that proved Miro was lying, he got upset and continued his pathetic behavior. He got upset merely because I refuted his bullshit with a public validation. I was not trying to embarrass the guy - just setting things straight, and he cracked it. So I took him back to court. The second judge also said his behavior was unacceptable, but not serious enough to charge him. She ended up yelling at him because he spoke over her and lied to her face, still denying his actions. He since hasn't repeated the behavior. I doubt he will. I don't give a crap about him and only asked him to mind his own business.

There is no other case. Ken, anyone paying attention found out how dishonest you could be, when I published messages that revealed you were lying about roulette computer inquiries. Your response to people laughing at you was to make a blatantly false and venomous claim that another member secretly said they were a convicted child molester. And that's the second time you made that claim against someone you wanted to harm. What's wrong with you ken? Your core is rotten. I am ashamed you were once a moderator here.

Seriously, some people I've come across are beyond pathetic. You are right up there, Ken.

There are many more, even worse knobs I've dealt with in my life. But at some point I understood the worst part was wasted time. Ken, don't overstate your importance to me. You are just a sad lonely guy behind a computer on a forum for banned people, clicking refresh here.

PS - I never "casted stones". You dug your own grave by being a dick to everyone here. Almost everyone hated you. That's not my fault but you are not man enough to take responsibility for your own mistakes. It's easier to blame the forum admin. I still half feel sorry for you. You have serious problems, really. But you do it all to yourself.

[Steve]

I'm curious Ken. When you fabricate blatant lies about people being child molesters, or cut and paste lies without caring if its true or not.... just to try and discredit someone.... Do you think to yourself "Gee, I'm a piece of shit liar. I'm a dishonest and hateful person. This is what my life has become"?

You know this intense hatred harms you far more than me? That's why your life is the way it is. Doesn't this ever cross your mind? Maybe you'll realize it eventually. Happy and successful people don't spend so much time attacking others. If you never mentioned me, I would forget you existed. Same for Michael Emilio Rodriguez trying to boost his forum, same for Mark Howe and Miro Zirdum selling computers, same for Tony Duhamel (Bago) arguing with almost every person. Amazing, miserable people. I only wish you could all focus on your own life.

Good luck Ken, but people like you rarely learn why they're unsuccessful and unhappy. I sincerely hope for your own sake you wake up one day. Until then, thankyou for plastering my name on GF again. Michael hates my name dominating his forum. Especially after the backlash for his stunt. A good chunk of it is dedicated to me.

[Taotie]

I tried banning Steve but It wont let me.
I tried putting him on moderated but it wont let me.

Sorry Turner, that's probably my fault....lol

I like this thread, though. 

[Roulettebeater]

I tried banning Steve but It wont let me.
I tried putting him on moderated but it wont let me.
It cant stop me calling him a very naughty boy.

Steve, you are a very naughty boy.

well, i have a proposal.
ban yourself instead of him, by doing so you prove that forums rules are being respected
-:)

[cht]

Sorry Turner, that's probably my fault....lol

I like this thread, though. 

I had fun and entertainment in mind when I started this thread, got loads of it. 

[vladir]

WTF(lol)  has this got to do with repeaters?

[Turner]

I checked the moderator logs and turner did. Probably because he knows it was a cheap stab from someone without a valid point

spot on

[Madi]

spot on

Stop serving steves personal interest. Work for all. U got lots of post to have a look in this thread.

[Madi]

2. Look at the context I called someone's wife a bitch. I don't think anyone besides you takes it seriously

Context doesnt matter. Matter is what u said. And what u said was totally unnecessary.

[Madi]

Hey Steve! You´re a son of a bitch!

R u sure i m the only serious person? What more serious things u wanna see? It was a joke i believe

[Turner]

Stop serving steves personal interest. Work for all. U got lots of post to have a look in this thread.

I moderate how I feel fit and have done it without advice for 4 years. All you have to worry about is what "you" type and how "you" behave

its a bunch of text on an internet forum. its not real FFS

[cht]

Back on topic.

Variance, even with a healthy edge, is often in the 400 unit range and much higher if you have only a small edge. ------ DSAA

That's the variance of the AP guru. 

No successful player plays with only a 24 unit bankroll. That's absurd.  ------- DSAA

Confirms that AP needs extra large bankroll. At manual table b&m casino 500units x $25(min) = $12,500++ minimum bankroll.

[Steve]

Madi get over it. You made accusations and i responded. I explained about your post and corrected rubbish you heard. My interest in that is only making the truth known.

Whatever your problem with me, move on, lets not waste time. You are being a deliberate antagonist lately. Its trolling.

If you dont agree with my math / logic, give constructive arguments to help progress

Lets get back on topic.

[cht]

Back on topic.

Variance, even with a healthy edge, is often in the 400 unit range and much higher if you have only a small edge. ------ DSAA

That's the variance of the AP guru. 

No successful player plays with only a 24 unit bankroll. That's absurd.  ------- DSAA

Confirms that AP needs extra large bankroll. At manual table b&m casino 500units x $25(min) = $12,500++ minimum bankroll.

The AP bankroll double 400 units normal variance is 400 x $25 x 2 = $16,000
The AP bankroll triple 400 units normal variance is 400 x $25 x 3 = $24,000 and so on....

This AP br can still be busted with the roll from hell whose sd is unbounded.

No triggers or virtual loss or stop loss applied. 

[Roulettebeater]

When the dealer spins the ball:



And the ball starts bouncing toooooooooo much



suddenly you realised that your bet is gonna lose



the moment in which you see that your bet really lost