• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Odds and payouts are different things. If either the odds or payouts don't change, then the result is the same - eventual loss.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Latest discussion on repeaters(GF)

Started by cht, Mar 20, 12:17 AM 2018

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 18 Guests are viewing this topic.

ZERO

Classic RB! It was like looking into a mirror...  :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:

Roulettebeater

Quote from: ZERO on Mar 26, 08:02 AM 2018
Classic RB! It was like looking into a mirror...  :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:

:twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:

Adrenalin in picture 2 is at its max

:twisted:
A dollar won is twice as sweet as as a dollar earned

Steve

It would be quite beneficial if players read up on basic statistics, standard deviation, the house edge, player edge, expectation, basic odds etc. Basics need to be understood or you go in circles. Nothing discussed here is new. Its all really old news any statistics student knows.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

cht

Quote from: cht on Mar 26, 07:40 AM 2018
Back on topic.

Variance, even with a healthy edge, is often in the 400 unit range and much higher if you have only a small edge. ------ DSAA

That's the variance of the AP guru.  :thumbsup:

No successful player plays with only a 24 unit bankroll. That's absurd.  ------- DSAA

Confirms that AP needs extra large bankroll. At manual table b&m casino 500units x $25(min) = $12,500++ minimum bankroll.
It has become clear that wheel and ball APers have to try circumvent variance with money management modeled on past statistical info collated - curve fitting and gamblers fallacy territory.

I don't subscribe to methods that use MM of extra large bankroll to circumvent variance. Reason being random has no bounds.

Roulettebeater

Quote from: Steve on Mar 26, 08:25 AM 2018
It would be quite beneficial if players read up on basic statistics, standard deviation, the house edge, player edge, expectation, basic odds etc. Basics need to be understood or you go in circles. Nothing discussed here is new. Its all really old news any statistics student knows.

Steve
You really need to move on, what you talking about are basics and every professional player know them.

Let's try to be constructive, now If cht, hollymolly or even luck7red has 500 $ and want to double them on roulette, what system would you suggest them to use ?
A dollar won is twice as sweet as as a dollar earned

Lucky7Red

Quote from: Roulettebeater on Mar 26, 08:47 AM 2018
Steve
You really need to move on,

Let's try to be constructive, now If cht, hollymolly or   â,¬â,¬   even luck7red   â,¬â,¬   has 500 $ and want to double them on roulette, what system would you suggest them to use ?
Lucky guy will know for sure how to use 500$ :)
when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth?

Roulettebeater

Quote from: Lucky7Red on Mar 26, 09:18 AM 2018
Lucky guy will know for sure how to use 500$ :)

know for sure how to "use" 5000$

OR

know for sure how to "lose" 5000$

?


-:)
A dollar won is twice as sweet as as a dollar earned

wiggy

Quote from: Taotie on Mar 26, 02:30 AM 2018

I like this thread, though.  ;D

If it's a toss up between this thread and the PATTERN BREAKER thread, that one wins IMO.....it's a doozy!

Here is a guy getting his daily fix of PB news and updates.  ;D


"You can lead a human to intelligence, but you can't make him think''

ozon

Back to the topic

One such an interesting question
  What are the virtual limits of showing the 3 time repeater?
We know that in 37 spins, the probability of showing 3 time repeater is over 98%.
But what are the percentages when we make it to the 42nd spin without 3 repeater, how far it can take?

Bigbroben

Quote from: ozon on Mar 26, 03:42 PM 2018
Back to the topic

One such an interesting question
  What are the virtual limits of showing the 3 time repeater?
We know that in 37 spins, the probability of showing 3 time repeater is over 98%.
But what are the percentages when we make it to the 42nd spin without 3 repeater, how far it can take?

You need Einstein and an Excel sheet!
Life is hard, and then you die.
Mes pensées sont le dernier retranchement de ma liberté.

ozon

2 hours of tests on RX
First hit 3 time repeater was at 48 spin ,.
Virtual limits that are far away

psimoes

There is a useful feature in RX that monitors all nrs that hit above the mean in real time. Shame that it only does so from the start of the session. It would be cool if it did it for every given last number of spins.
[Math+1] beats a Math game

psimoes

Because betting all nrs that hit above the mean seems to work, on-screen at least (impractical).
[Math+1] beats a Math game

Steve

Quote from: Roulettebeater on Mar 26, 08:47 AM 2018
Steve
You really need to move on, what you talking about are basics and every professional player know them.

Let's try to be constructive, now If cht, hollymolly or even luck7red has 500 $ and want to double them on roulette, what system would you suggest them to use ?


if the basics were understood, this thread wouldnt exist. i am trying to be constructive.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

Madi

Quote from: Steve on Mar 27, 06:18 AM 2018
if the basics were understood, this thread wouldnt exist. i am trying to be constructive.

Plz explain a 5 repeater in 37 spin on the basis of ur rigid math 1/37. I said rigid math.

-