TURBO'S REPEATERS SIMULATION.

[The General]

Ghost,

A quick fyi...on a biased wheel not every number can be a winner.  LOL!!!

[RouletteGhost]

Insignificant number of spins

A closet systems player

NEXT

I’m convinced. The General is as crazy as falkor

The flat earth brigade.

[Steve]

Actually especially when looking at sector bias, 7000 is enough spins to be statistically relevant.

It is not guaranteed bias. It never is 100% guaranteed. Its about likely edge.

But add visual or sound confirmation then it gets pretty darn solid, even with much fewer spins.

[The General]

Number Hits                Frequency          Standard Deviation

37      183   0   183   38.35519126   -0.127548358
27      180   0   180   38.99444444   -0.351248556
10      179   0   179   39.2122905   -0.425815289
25      203   0   203   34.57635468   1.363786294
29      157   0   157   44.70700637   -2.066283406
12      192   0   192   36.55729167   0.543552235
8      167   0   167   42.02994012   -1.32061608
19      199   0   199   35.27135678   1.065519363
31      237   0   237   29.61603376   3.899055202
18      209   0   209   33.58373206   1.811186689
6      163   0   163   43.06134969   -1.61888301
21      180   0   180   38.99444444   -0.351248556
33      191   0   191   36.7486911   0.468985502
16      220   0   220   31.90454545   2.631420748
4      221   0   221   31.760181   2.70598748
23      140   0   140   50.13571429   -3.33391786
35      154   0   154   45.57792208   -2.289983604
14      156   0   156   44.99358974   -2.140850139
2      170   0   170   41.28823529   -1.096915882
0      205   0   205   34.23902439   1.512919759
28      197   0   197   35.62944162   0.916385898
9      187   0   187   37.53475936   0.170718572
26      197   0   197   35.62944162   0.916385898
30      179   0   179   39.2122905   -0.425815289
11      178   0   178   39.43258427   -0.500382021
7      141   0   141   49.78014184   -3.259351128
20      253   0   253   27.743083   5.092122923
32      192   0   192   36.55729167   0.543552235
17      177   0   177   39.65536723   -0.574948754
5      161   0   161   43.59627329   -1.768016476
22      159   0   159   44.14465409   -1.917149941
34      190   0   190   36.94210526   0.39441877
15      153   0   153   45.87581699   -2.364550336
3      164   0   164   42.79878049   -1.544316278
24      240   0   240   29.24583333   4.1227554
36      187   0   187   37.53475936   0.170718572
13      166   0   166   42.28313253   -1.395182813
1      192   0   192   36.55729167   0.543552235
                  
Total      7019   0   7019      
                  
High      253   0   253      5.092122923
Low      140   0   140      -3.33391786
                  
Chance of                  
random (1/x)      1.21202E+13      1.21202E+13      
Chi square      139.5037755      139.5037755      
                  
Average      184.7105263   0   184.7105263      
Break even      194.9722222   0   194.9722222      
                  
80% hi conf.      218.2375418   0   218.2375418      
95% hi conf.      224.9429449   0   224.9429449      
80% low conf.      151.1835108   0   151.1835108      
95% low conf.      144.4781077   0   144.4781077      
                  
Best ratio      27.743083      27.743083      
Worst ratio      50.13571429      50.13571429   


A chi square of 139.5 isn't significant at 7000 spins huh??  LOL!!! 
The chance of randomness is    1.21202E+13     That's the same as 1 in  12,120,000,000,000

When a wheel is as strongly biased as this one you don't need more spins.  I knew this one was biased on sight based on the defects that I saw. 

Ghost,

I know you don't know what any of this means, and I know you're disappointed that all of the numbers can't be winners.

Maestro,

Pic your numbers.  Let's see how you do.  I have several thousand more spins from this wheel, including the live number stream. 

[maestro]

Pic your numbers.  Let's see how you do.  I have several thousand more spins from this wheel, including the live number stream.

pick my numbers ...
here are they as random as it gets

[Turner]

Number Hits                Frequency          Standard Deviation

37      183   0   183   38.35519126   -0.127548358
27      180   0   180   38.99444444   -0.351248556
10      179   0   179   39.2122905   -0.425815289
25      203   0   203   34.57635468   1.363786294
29      157   0   157   44.70700637   -2.066283406
12      192   0   192   36.55729167   0.543552235
8      167   0   167   42.02994012   -1.32061608
19      199   0   199   35.27135678   1.065519363
31      237   0   237   29.61603376   3.899055202
18      209   0   209   33.58373206   1.811186689
6      163   0   163   43.06134969   -1.61888301
21      180   0   180   38.99444444   -0.351248556
33      191   0   191   36.7486911   0.468985502
16      220   0   220   31.90454545   2.631420748
4      221   0   221   31.760181   2.70598748
23      140   0   140   50.13571429   -3.33391786
35      154   0   154   45.57792208   -2.289983604
14      156   0   156   44.99358974   -2.140850139
2      170   0   170   41.28823529   -1.096915882
0      205   0   205   34.23902439   1.512919759
28      197   0   197   35.62944162   0.916385898
9      187   0   187   37.53475936   0.170718572
26      197   0   197   35.62944162   0.916385898
30      179   0   179   39.2122905   -0.425815289
11      178   0   178   39.43258427   -0.500382021
7      141   0   141   49.78014184   -3.259351128
20      253   0   253   27.743083   5.092122923
32      192   0   192   36.55729167   0.543552235
17      177   0   177   39.65536723   -0.574948754
5      161   0   161   43.59627329   -1.768016476
22      159   0   159   44.14465409   -1.917149941
34      190   0   190   36.94210526   0.39441877
15      153   0   153   45.87581699   -2.364550336
3      164   0   164   42.79878049   -1.544316278
24      240   0   240   29.24583333   4.1227554
36      187   0   187   37.53475936   0.170718572
13      166   0   166   42.28313253   -1.395182813
1      192   0   192   36.55729167   0.543552235
                  

Just interested.....
20 is at SD 5 which isnt normal. Is that the bias?
If so....why are the neighbours quite normal....or am I miles out

[cht]

Just interested.....
20 is at SD 5 which isnt normal. Is that the bias?
If so....why are the neighbours quite normal....or am I miles out

31,20,16,24 shows higher sd indicating bias sector.

Problem with this method is after you spend a lot of time to collect 8000 spins data(manual table spins at 3-4mins average) to determine the bias sector, the casino do their regular calibration maintenance at 4-5am. This hot sector disappears. Then you go on another spins data collection again and so on......that requires you to live in the casino and that you operate as a team round the clock. You can't rely on the history board everyone knows they are fake.......life is hard.

[nottophammer]

CHT, thats the polite way
This the way to say it LOAD OF BOLLOX

[RouletteGhost]

Chances are the casinos receive detailed reports on their wheels. There are companies that maintain the wheels and provide data

In 2018 a biased wheel would be fixed or swapped out. The casino knows all.

If in fact General is actually playing, his wins are due to luck

No proof. Empty words.

Maybe he uses a negative progression.

Absurd

[RouletteGhost]

[nottophammer]

Like it RG, Like it, the quote in white chicks, BACK AT YA

[Turner]

Personally, and only from an educated guess, I cant see the Blackjack team being more savvy than the Roulette team
BJ killed card counting with CSM so Roulette team must know wnen their wheels are biased and have counter measures.
Searching for a biased wheel is like the search for the holy grail.....pun intended

[nottophammer]

Your on form Turner,pitty your team weren't
Irons, irons

[Turner]

Your on form Turner,pitty your team weren't
Irons, irons

Looks like we are going to have to just settle for the league and league cup
Once upon a time the only thing we had was beating the shyte.

[The General]

Turner wrote-Just interested.....
20 is at SD 5 which isnt normal. Is that the bias?
If so....why are the neighbours quite normal....or am I miles out

Contrary to popular believe, biased wheels can produce single numbers biases or section biases.
This wheel had a series of loose frets and some loose pocket bottom inserts. 

Problem with this method is after you spend a lot of time to collect 8000 spins data(manual table spins at 3-4mins average) to determine the bias sector, the casino do their regular calibration maintenance at 4-5am. This hot sector disappears. Then you go on another spins data collection again and so on......that requires you to live in the casino and that you operate as a team round the clock. You can't rely on the history board everyone knows they are fake.......life is hard.

No, the readerboard on this wheel was 100% accurate. 
Why on earth would you think that you have to track a biased wheel around the clock???  Again, contrary to popular believe we tracked it off and on over several days.

The wheel persisted for four years in the casino.  It was located in Las Vegas.  Yes, it was moved around periodically, but that was to our benefit.  Tracking the marks...wood grain etc... is very easy so finding the wheel was simple.  In this particular casino 1/3 of the wheels were biased at the time.  Most of the biased wheels are the results of sloppy assembly.

Casinos don't replace wheels just because they're bias.  That's absurd.  They merely move them around. Besides, I could tell most of the people here that a wheel is biased, but most would not be able to beat it.  (And one naive person said they were disappointed because not all of the numbers on the wheel were winners.ROFLOL!!! )    The same is true in the casino.  Biased wheels usually make just as much as the other wheels, so why replace them if the table is still winning?


Who would like to take a shot at betting it?  You've only seen half of the data.  So place your bets.