TURBO'S REPEATERS SIMULATION.

[Steve]

1. The insignificance of low volume of spins is not opinion. Try asking a statastician. Even a student would understand the math.

2. You ask to be taught, but you have, repeatedly. You are ignoring the lessons and advice.

[RouletteGhost]

2. You ask to be taught, but you have, repeatedly. You are ignoring the lessons and advice.

WRONG

Maybe you did not read my signature?

I have always argued long term million spin tests mean nothing for system players that hit and run OR play for an insignificant number of spins

I like you Steve. But you have a business to sell computers. Anything else is not part of the agenda

I get it.

Fully aware anything fails long term due to house edge

Nothing new here. Coders are wasting time. Play your system hit and run and be happy.

By the way. Your #1 point. Low spins. That’s my argument. You made my point for me. Playing low spins gives graphs like nottos

[RouletteGhost]

1. The insignificance of low volume of spins is not opinion. Try asking a statastician. Even a student would understand the math.

This is the point I have been making!!!!

This is to our advantage

[RouletteGhost]

System players win because of the insignificant number of spins

Which is what we do

[cht]

My point is that winning only 10 units is trvial.  It's insignificant.   Here's why.  Even if you had a tiny edge over the casino of one or two percent, the variance would be thousands of units! This means your 10 units is miniscule.  Meaningless. 

600 spins tested over how many games?  To me it appears as though you're just cherry picking when to quit because your too afraid to play a statistically relevant number of spins. 

Sorry, just the facts.

-The General

Steve,  you agree with that. Now we know your ignorance.

Hahahahahaha  

[nottophammer]

His (very stupid) logic is that if you do not play long enough to lose, then it is insignificant and meaningless

if you do not play long enough to lose, then it is insignificant and meaningless
You are right RG he's as thick as that plank of wood, and by the look of it, his half bro is as well, Why would any person playing roulette play longer than the necessary spins to win, you, I and the members learn game by game, we know you do not stay longer than you have too as the RFH is going to come, these obviously don't, Steve and who ever you are

[maestro]

@ General...can you post a graph say distribution of outcomes when you have biased wheel just wonder how does it look like..and what makes you bet on what you bet... thanks

i ask again just in case ...thanks

[Steve]

I like you Steve. But you have a business to sell computers. Anything else is not part of the agenda

no you dont get it. i could sell popcorn and it wouldnt change the truth.

You dont get i do well for myself with or without selling anything, and couldnt give a flying fuck if someone didnt want to buy a computer. Simply they are available and anyone can do their own research if interested.

If you knew me, youd know i put truth well ahead of personal interest. But you dont know me. You base opinion on what you think you or others would do.

The entire professional world agrees with me and caleb. It must be a grand conspiracy, right?

Or maybe the majority of people on forums just dont get it.

[RouletteGhost]

no you dont get it. i could sell popcorn and it wouldnt change the truth.

You dont get i do well for myself with or without selling anything, and couldnt give a flying f*** if someone didnt want to buy a computer. Simply they are available and anyone can do their own research if interested.

If you knew me, youd know i put truth well ahead of personal interest. But you dont know me. You base opinion on what you think you or others would do.

The entire professional world agrees with me and caleb. It must be a grand conspiracy, right?

Or maybe the majority of people on forums just dont get it.

I think it is yourself and caleb that do not get it

noone claims to beat the math or the house edge...at least the sane people do not

you made my point very clear with "1. The insignificance of low volume of spins is not opinion. Try asking a statastician. Even a student would understand the math."

think about that

[Steve]

And this belief that you can win long term by playing short term sessions is bullshit.

[RouletteGhost]

no

it is not

you say "you are only winning because you are not playing enough spins"

Caleb will agree with me (i think) that the key to being successful IF YOU DO NOT EXPLOIT THE WHEEL IN SOME WAY is to play a statistically insignificant number of spins

this is what gives system's players success

[Steve]

No, playing fewer spins does not make players win. Will your theory work if 100 players all played just one session in their life?

[RouletteGhost]

ok so then we can no longer say we need to test a million spins? that what you are saying...thats what it sounds like

[Steve]

Where did i say that? Read my recent posts. Never is short term an indicator of system effectiveness.

Its all here so i dont need to repeat:
:.roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy/

Everyone here should read it.

[RouletteGhost]

short term winning does NOT MEAN a system wins LONG TERM you and Caleb as usual miss the point on this. noone is saying that

im going with my regular scheduled programming