TURBO'S REPEATERS SIMULATION.

[RouletteGhost]

  (And one naive person said they were disappointed because not all of the numbers on the wheel were winners.ROFLOL!!! )   

I was trolling you



Don’t tell me 7000 spins shows a bias. Those results could have been from a non biased wheel

If you are betting the numbers that show up hot, then congratufuckinglations, your a system player.

[The General]

I was trolling you



Don’t tell me 7000 spins shows a bias. Those results could have been from a non biased wheel

If you are betting the numbers that show up hot, then congratufuckinglations, your a system player

Ghost,

Give it up!  Try slots instead.

[The General]

Regarding Turbo's system and his comment that, "Random beats random" and "winning because the wheel is random."

The comments are of course, quite absurd.  In reality people playing the system really need the wheel to be as non random as possible.  What everyone really needs is what's called a very high chi square result for the test sample in order for the system to perform well. Think of the chi square as being a fitness test for the randomness of the wheel.  The higher the value of the chi, the better the system is likely to perform.  The lower the value, the more likely the system is to tank.  Ideally, you'd want a very biased wheel.

Here's more on the chi square test from Wiki...  link:s://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chi-squared_test

A chi-squared test, also written as χ2 test, is any statistical hypothesis test where the sampling distribution of the test statistic is a chi-squared distribution when the null hypothesis is true. Without other qualification, 'chi-squared test' often is used as short for Pearson's chi-squared test. The chi-squared test is used to determine whether there is a significant difference between the expected frequencies and the observed frequencies in one or more categories.

In the standard applications of the test, the observations are classified into mutually exclusive classes, and there is some theory, or say null hypothesis, which gives the probability that any observation falls into the corresponding class. The purpose of the test is to evaluate how likely, the observations that are made would be, assuming the null hypothesis is true.

Chi-squared tests are often constructed from a sum of squared errors, or through the sample variance. Test statistics that follow a chi-squared distribution arise from an assumption of independent normally distributed data, which is valid in many cases due to the central limit theorem. A chi-squared test can be used to attempt rejection of the null hypothesis that the data are independent.

Also considered a chi-squared test is a test in which this is asymptotically true, meaning that the sampling distribution (if the null hypothesis is true) can be made to approximate a chi-squared distribution as closely as desired by making the sample size large enough.

[TurboGenius]

Besides, I could tell most of the people here that a wheel is biased, but most would not be able to beat it.

Yeah - who could figure out to play the hot numbers ? That's complicated.
Oh wait - you're doing the same thing as I am only you can only do it on a defective
wheel, where as I can do it on any wheel, any rng.
(and always win)

[TurboGenius]

Regarding Turbo's system and his comment that, "Random beats random" and "winning because the wheel is random."
The comments are of course, quite absurd.

You must mean my results in testing, live casino play, online test sites, online play sites, actual math - those results are all absurd - all absurd. Oh wait, that's "misleading" again I guess. None of my results matter (lol) - play money, not enough spins, rigged, absurdity....always something to plug in to insult what you don't understand.
I don't need abnormal chi-square results to win either, and no bias wheel, no computer - it's amazing. But hey, that's me.

[Roulettebeater]

You must mean my results in testing, live casino play, online test sites, online play sites, actual math - those results are all absurd - all absurd. Oh wait, that's "misleading" again I guess. None of my results matter (lol) - play money, not enough spins, rigged, absurdity....always something to plug in to insult what you don't understand.
I don't need abnormal chi-square results to win either, and no bias wheel, no computer - it's amazing. But hey, that's me.

Players who are winners either stay silent or show proof of their profits as i've recently did.
unless that it's only Bla Bla

[RouletteGhost]

Turbo, I am pretty certain that the general and Steve are wrong about your method

First off, this is hot numbers in cycles which is a guarantee 99% of the time. So if it works then having them say “it doesn’t work” is empty words

Secondly, you can always tell when a method has merit when it’s attacked on all fronts.

The amount of threads and comments in regards to it from Steve and general speaks volumes

In the penny stock world, you know when a stock has potential when the bashers come out on the forums. Same here

I have no reason to doubt TG and this is an obvious attack from guys who claim AP but never provide proof.

The belittling in the forum of “sorry you don’t understand elementary math” is just a way to make you look stupid.

You have no safe haven with methods anymore so better off not sharing

Lastly, you are only playing a few numbers. That’s respectable. So fook them.

Especially condescending general. He has nothing to offer anyone but criticism. I think he’s full of shit.

[nottophammer]

[Lucky7Red]

This is holy snail. 

[Roulettebeater]

You have apparently no idea what you are talking about...

When people will finally understand that roulette is beatable by increasing accuracy ... there is no other way !! Get it

Forget all shit with randomness ! I have nothing against turbo, but one can't tell a lie and keep believing it.

[Winner]

People always talk about accuracy this is not basketball you don't have control of the ivory ball.

[The General]

actual math

Where?  When?  Steve and I both have asked you repeatedly to demonstrate how the probability is affected by playing repeaters and what you feel the edge is playing them.   

[RouletteGhost]

Steve and I both have asked you repeatedly

Oh look everyone, this is the part where the general BROWN noses Steve

How predictable. So he can come back and harass people again

[Roulettebeater]

congratufuckinglations

Nice word !
Thx for sharing

[The General]

Turbo, I am pretty certain that the general and Steve are wrong about your method

First off, this is hot numbers in cycles which is a guarantee 99% of the time. So if it works then having them say “it doesn’t work” is empty words

Secondly, you can always tell when a method has merit when it’s attacked on all fronts.

The amount of threads and comments in regards to it from Steve and general speaks volumes

In the penny stock world, you know when a stock has potential when the bashers come out on the forums. Same here

I have no reason to doubt TG and this is an obvious attack from guys who claim AP but never provide proof.

The belittling in the forum of “sorry you don’t understand elementary math” is just a way to make you look stupid.

You have no safe haven with methods anymore so better off not sharing

Lastly, you are only playing a few numbers. That’s respectable. So fook them.

Especially condescending general. He has nothing to offer anyone but criticism. I think he’s full of shit.

Ermmm Ghost,

I thought you said that you knew systems don't work though...

The point is that most know the odds are not changed..so those that seek to prove what we already know is a waste of time

When people play and win win win and you tell them it "does not work" is a bit silly