• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Progression bets are nothing more than different size bets on different spins. You could get lucky and win big, or unlucky and lose even more.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

TURBO'S REPEATERS SIMULATION.

Started by daveylibra, Apr 01, 06:18 PM 2018

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 47 Guests are viewing this topic.

RouletteGhost

Quote from: The General on Apr 08, 03:09 PM 2018
  (And one naive person said they were disappointed because not all of the numbers on the wheel were winners.ROFLOL!!! ::))   

I was trolling you



Don’t tell me 7000 spins shows a bias. Those results could have been from a non biased wheel

If you are betting the numbers that show up hot, then congratufuckinglations, your a system player.
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

The General

Quote from: RouletteGhost on Apr 08, 03:17 PM 2018
I was trolling you



Don’t tell me 7000 spins shows a bias. Those results could have been from a non biased wheel

If you are betting the numbers that show up hot, then congratufuckinglations, your a system player



Ghost,

Give it up!  Try slots instead.
Basic probability and The General are your friend.
(Now hiring minions, apply within.)

The General

Regarding Turbo's system and his comment that, "Random beats random" and "winning because the wheel is random."

The comments are of course, quite absurd.  In reality people playing the system really need the wheel to be as non random as possible.  What everyone really needs is what's called a very high chi square result for the test sample in order for the system to perform well. Think of the chi square as being a fitness test for the randomness of the wheel.  The higher the value of the chi, the better the system is likely to perform.  The lower the value, the more likely the system is to tank.  Ideally, you'd want a very biased wheel.

Here's more on the chi square test from Wiki...  link:s://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chi-squared_test

A chi-squared test, also written as χ2 test, is any statistical hypothesis test where the sampling distribution of the test statistic is a chi-squared distribution when the null hypothesis is true. Without other qualification, 'chi-squared test' often is used as short for Pearson's chi-squared test. The chi-squared test is used to determine whether there is a significant difference between the expected frequencies and the observed frequencies in one or more categories.

In the standard applications of the test, the observations are classified into mutually exclusive classes, and there is some theory, or say null hypothesis, which gives the probability that any observation falls into the corresponding class. The purpose of the test is to evaluate how likely, the observations that are made would be, assuming the null hypothesis is true.

Chi-squared tests are often constructed from a sum of squared errors, or through the sample variance. Test statistics that follow a chi-squared distribution arise from an assumption of independent normally distributed data, which is valid in many cases due to the central limit theorem. A chi-squared test can be used to attempt rejection of the null hypothesis that the data are independent.

Also considered a chi-squared test is a test in which this is asymptotically true, meaning that the sampling distribution (if the null hypothesis is true) can be made to approximate a chi-squared distribution as closely as desired by making the sample size large enough.
Basic probability and The General are your friend.
(Now hiring minions, apply within.)

TurboGenius

Quote from: The General on Apr 08, 03:09 PM 2018Besides, I could tell most of the people here that a wheel is biased, but most would not be able to beat it.

Yeah - who could figure out to play the hot numbers ? That's complicated.
Oh wait - you're doing the same thing as I am only you can only do it on a defective
wheel, where as I can do it on any wheel, any rng.
(and always win)
link:[url="s://s18.postimg.cc/rgantqrs9/image.jpg"]s://s18.postimg.cc/rgantqrs9/image.jpg[/url]
link:[url="s://s15.postimg.cc/5lgm9j86j/turbo-banner.gif"]s://s15.postimg.cc/5lgm9j86j/turbo-banner.gif[/url]

TurboGenius

Quote from: The General on Apr 09, 04:08 AM 2018Regarding Turbo's system and his comment that, "Random beats random" and "winning because the wheel is random."
The comments are of course, quite absurd.

You must mean my results in testing, live casino play, online test sites, online play sites, actual math - those results are all absurd - all absurd. Oh wait, that's "misleading" again I guess. None of my results matter (lol) - play money, not enough spins, rigged, absurdity....always something to plug in to insult what you don't understand.
I don't need abnormal chi-square results to win either, and no bias wheel, no computer - it's amazing. But hey, that's me.
link:[url="s://s18.postimg.cc/rgantqrs9/image.jpg"]s://s18.postimg.cc/rgantqrs9/image.jpg[/url]
link:[url="s://s15.postimg.cc/5lgm9j86j/turbo-banner.gif"]s://s15.postimg.cc/5lgm9j86j/turbo-banner.gif[/url]

Roulettebeater

Quote from: TurboGenius on Apr 09, 06:53 AM 2018
You must mean my results in testing, live casino play, online test sites, online play sites, actual math - those results are all absurd - all absurd. Oh wait, that's "misleading" again I guess. None of my results matter (lol) - play money, not enough spins, rigged, absurdity....always something to plug in to insult what you don't understand.
I don't need abnormal chi-square results to win either, and no bias wheel, no computer - it's amazing. But hey, that's me.

Players who are winners either stay silent or show proof of their profits as i've recently did.
unless that it's only Bla Bla

A dollar won is twice as sweet as as a dollar earned

RouletteGhost

Turbo, I am pretty certain that the general and Steve are wrong about your method

First off, this is hot numbers in cycles which is a guarantee 99% of the time. So if it works then having them say “it doesn’t work” is empty words

Secondly, you can always tell when a method has merit when it’s attacked on all fronts.

The amount of threads and comments in regards to it from Steve and general speaks volumes

In the penny stock world, you know when a stock has potential when the bashers come out on the forums. Same here

I have no reason to doubt TG and this is an obvious attack from guys who claim AP but never provide proof.

The belittling in the forum of “sorry you don’t understand elementary math” is just a way to make you look stupid.

You have no safe haven with methods anymore so better off not sharing

Lastly, you are only playing a few numbers. That’s respectable. So fook them.

Especially condescending general. He has nothing to offer anyone but criticism. I think he’s full of shit. :)
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

nottophammer

How do you win at roulette, simple, make the right decision

Lucky7Red

when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth?

Roulettebeater

You have apparently no idea what you are talking about...

When people will finally understand that roulette is beatable by increasing accuracy ... there is no other way !! Get it

Forget all shit with randomness ! I have nothing against turbo, but one can't tell a lie and keep believing it.
A dollar won is twice as sweet as as a dollar earned

Winner

People always talk about accuracy this is not basketball you don't have control of the ivory ball.

The General

Quote from: TurboGenius on Apr 09, 06:53 AM 2018
actual math

Where?  When?  Steve and I both have asked you repeatedly to demonstrate how the probability is affected by playing repeaters and what you feel the edge is playing them.   
Basic probability and The General are your friend.
(Now hiring minions, apply within.)

RouletteGhost

Quote from: The General on Apr 09, 03:08 PM 2018
Steve and I both have asked you repeatedly

Oh look everyone, this is the part where the general BROWN noses Steve

How predictable. So he can come back and harass people again




the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

Roulettebeater

A dollar won is twice as sweet as as a dollar earned

The General

Quote from: RouletteGhost on Apr 09, 08:19 AM 2018
Turbo, I am pretty certain that the general and Steve are wrong about your method

First off, this is hot numbers in cycles which is a guarantee 99% of the time. So if it works then having them say “it doesn’t work” is empty words

Secondly, you can always tell when a method has merit when it’s attacked on all fronts.

The amount of threads and comments in regards to it from Steve and general speaks volumes

In the penny stock world, you know when a stock has potential when the bashers come out on the forums. Same here

I have no reason to doubt TG and this is an obvious attack from guys who claim AP but never provide proof.

The belittling in the forum of “sorry you don’t understand elementary math” is just a way to make you look stupid.

You have no safe haven with methods anymore so better off not sharing

Lastly, you are only playing a few numbers. That’s respectable. So fook them.

Especially condescending general. He has nothing to offer anyone but criticism. I think he’s full of shit. :)

Ermmm Ghost,

I thought you said that you knew systems don't work though...

QuoteThe point is that most know the odds are not changed..so those that seek to prove what we already know is a waste of time

When people play and win win win and you tell them it "does not work" is a bit silly

Basic probability and The General are your friend.
(Now hiring minions, apply within.)

-