TURBO'S REPEATERS SIMULATION.

[TurboGenius]

It's really convenient.

Player A brings 3k as a bankroll to the casino
Player B gets 3k from the casino (bonus)
Now our math is supposedly different.
They both lose.

Player A comes back the next day with another 3k
Player B gets 3k from the casino (bonus)
They both lose.

Player A comes back the next day with another 3k
Player B gets 3k from the casino (bonus)
HEY ! they both win today ! they double their money !

Player A = -3000 -3000 +3000 and is at -3000 and NOT on the leaderboard.
Player B = -3000 -3000 +3000 and is at -3000 and NOT on the leaderboard.
Turbo plays and wins 5000.00 on the third day - wow.
-3000 - 3000 +5000 and is at -1000 = NOT on the leaderboard. lol

It's the same, casino or log in - one brings a bankroll and one gets it daily but it doesn't count towards any kind of "winnings" until you are above everything that you lost prior.............. sighs.
I'm not sure why I bother lol

And it's soooooooo easy and rigged - you should do it there then.
Rank #1 and stay there for a few weeks. (bot - lol, no really. I have almost
no time and did it without a bot) but do whatever you want.
If you can at least match what I did there I'm sure everyone would be impressed -
but you can't do it - even with a bot.
So what if you build up your log in bonus and put it all on "RED" for 1 spin.
You can lose too - now you're in the hole and have to get out, not easy right ?
So it's a useless challenge I guess. Just keep calling it rigged and I'm misleading,
it's maybe the only way to deal with it without having to accept that things
are possible. I won't mention the subject unless someone asks me to.
Like I said, my live play (it will be "not enough spins") will show that what I'm doing works and continues to work for as long as I want.

[Steve]

but you are an open minded guy who will look at radical ways other than AP and you are not out to disrupt the site. You are not a virus. A virus that is very very predictable in the way it escalates.

It is easy to deal with escalation if it happens.

[Steve]

I didn't read the whole thing (but I will).

So far....maybe I still can't explain it -

The math doesn't change like you seem to think it does.

You forgot - they're using the same math.
They both bet on red and black shows.
One lost 21,000.00 and the other 1,000
The math doesn't change at all - bet big and win or lose big, bet less and win or lose less - same math, no advantage.
But anyway - you just assume they both won and now the one player is so far ahead of the other..
in reality - if they both lose, one only lost 1k and the other 21 times that.
Anyway - I'll add more once I read more.

You do a lot of talking about math for someone who doesnt understand properly.

You forget if they used the same system with progression, one will go bust really early, and the other can continue a much longer progression and eventually win. So tell me again, there's no advantage to the player with $21,000. Right?

[Steve]

CHT, yes I have an open mind. I do not believe repeaters is a valid method, because of my own testing, the extensive testing of others and much more. In fact all information indicates repeaters cannot work. It's just like the flat earth theory - all the proof points the other way. There's not a single bit of valid information to show otherwise.

[Steve]

Turbo, correct your math. At least try to understand someone with a large bankroll is much more likely to profit than someone with a smaller bankroll. Why? Because they can extend their progression much longer. Eventually they too will lose, but the odds are they'll win enough to outrank other players who had much less to play with. And they you get a huge bonus and can more easily repeat the process.

You say you dont know why you bother, as if I'm the one not understanding. Come on, this is really basic.

[cht]

CHT, yes I have an open mind. I do not believe repeaters is a valid method, because of my own testing, the extensive testing of others and much more. In fact all information indicates repeaters cannot work. It's just like the flat earth theory - all the proof points the other way. There's not a single bit of valid information [posted on forum] to show otherwise.

Some people(don't assume to include me) are not black and white with repeaters. They believe in shades of gray.

[Steve]

CHT, when researching the flat earth gibberish, I did much broader research off the forum. Mostly a variety of youtube videos from notable flat earth theorists who claimed their video had irrefutable proof. And the proof turned out to be ignorance so bad I'd have to call it "sickness".

I really gave it an open mind look. but every piece of so called proof didnt check out. the only valid information I found was that NASA edits photos. But that could be for many other, more realistic reasons.

[The General]

Turbo,

Do you feel that your method would win if you were to FLAT bet?  (Meaning no progression is used.)

[jekhb76]

@Turbo.

I'm wondering, you Have said in the past that you once needed to go to a six step progression with your System.
May i ask what a Safe bankroll would be to play your System? You've said that on roulette simulator the 3000 units is to Low, so what is the safepoint to start playing Without having to worry about the bank bein' busted? And what Max progression do you use for a six or seven step one?
Is it: 1/5/25/50/100/125 (150) ?
Thanks for taking your Time to awnser.
Cheers, eddy

[jekhb76]

I'm almost certain that Turbo doesn't play Every repeater that comes along.
Well he maybe bet every repeater but not at the same Time that is. Because of the simple fact, that it would be too much presure on the bankroll.
My guess is that he is playing a Max of 4-8 repeaters at the same Time, but not More then 8.
So let's say he is playing a Max of 8 numbers All the Time, my guess is that when he reached that 8 numbers, he is Staying with these Max Right All the Time for the rest of the session. So 8 numbers Max All the Time but they would be shifting! So everytime a new repeater Comes into play, he could remove the oldest one non hit repeater from that 8 list. So he makes sure he is Always playing the hottest repeaters at that time. Cycle Independent.
The only problem that comes to my mind, is when a number is hit and het a higher chip value but after 8 spins Without a hit this number Will fall of the list as well, but that Will cost you alot of money . I can't figure out how this can be solved.

[boyd30]

Didn't Turbo say he play a maximum of 4 repeaters? He can confirm if this is true or not?

[jekhb76]

Didn't Turbo say he play a maximum of 4 repeaters? He can confirm if this is true or not?

No he didn't say that. I follow his threads for years now and he never said that he is playing a Max of 4 numbers. Only that he doesn't bet on every repeater that comes along, because you can't profit from that.
So he has a Max of numbers he would bet. But like i said before, it doesn't feel Right to play like this. Because you are actualy forcing the wheel to produceren a winner at least Evert 8 spins, if you are playing with Max 8. Otherwise the numbers in play Will be replaced with new ones All the Time, including the ones with High value chips on them. The good things is that the betselection can't grow out of hand.

[Roulettebeater]

Stop assuming how turbo plays
Don't put a lot of hope on him, he won't tell you more

Get deeper in the hole and you will never go out of it -:)

[nottophammer]

Ask yourself why is betting for repeaters better than betting non-hit?
This lovely tester made by the great Priyanka, is good to see why you’ll need to go more than 1 cycle, most games, sometimes it’ll get the 3X, but today not.
So let’s look at these 37 spins or 1/37
In grey the 37 spins using 1 unit each time, total cost 703 units. This way you’ll need 20 wins of return value 36.
Now if like Eddy say’s, maybe Turbo’s way, just bet the 4 hottest, 11, 27, 10, 24; you get a win.
Ok you’re likely to have 1 repeat in 1st 10 spins, but if you look in 100 days of Mort, spins 11-40 you can see the average is 15.69668246 I don’t stick to math rule I just use the 15, so 15 non-hit and 15 repeats. Ok use math and its 16; so today’s checkpoint is spot on, 16 non-hits came, means 14 repeats happened.
Now you’re looking for repeats, how do those repeats come? You’ll have to collect lots of games to get the non-hit averages, forget all this 1 in 37; over 37 spins repeats happen and like Turbo you can see when they’ll come, that large starting group of 37 #’s gets smaller as those 1x’s grow the repeat has to happen, the GUT paper tracker usable in B+M, HERE it comes General lets you see the trot or use countback.

Or just KFC

[nottophammer]

ROFL



Pie in the sky?