baccarat test

[RouletteGhost]

began testing a baccarat 3 wide matrix....with a max 1 2 4 progression...if the 1 2 4 busts i take the loss and reset

in one shoe I had a total of TWO busts and still made 5 units

I will continue to test, if it works out I will post the strategy

until then anyone know where I can find shoes?

[caddy]

Wizard of Odds has a large 6 and 8 deck file that you can use easily.

[RouletteGhost]

chances are what im doing will fail

i need to test several shoes before i get excited

[Thanatos]

Had a fairly hard time finding anyone actually playing Baccarat on youtube. Aka there is tonnes of slots players, but when it comes to actual "table games" there isnt really anyone uploading videos or going live. Lots of the usual "get rich"/scam short videos.

However i found David C channel:
link:s://:.youtube.com/channel/UCwZnxtu5QtMyYjnCc93I9eQ

He actually plays a lot of table games including Baccarat. I watch him sometimes to get my baccaret/poker/bj fix. He actually arnt a completely lost case as he does (accidentally?) play "regression" it seems. That is if i can handle his attitude & handheld camera. Worst case you can always grab some actual Baccarat shoes from the videos.

Oh and if someone else knows a good baccarat or similar table games Youtuber feel free to share 

[RouletteGhost]

Ok I tested the same shoe I already have in firstnpost as well as a second shoe. With a tweak

First shoe +7 second shoe +5

This is a stupid, rookie system.

[DoctorSudoku]

Ok I tested the same shoe I already have in firstnpost as well as a second shoe. With a tweak

First shoe +7 second shoe +5

This is a stupid, rookie system.

Rich,
One part of this method seems to be to bet that the latest row will NOT match the row three rows back.

But there are other aspects of this method that are less clear.

When you feel comfortable sharing it with us, please do so.

This could be an interesting addition to the group of matrix methods that have been posted in this forum over the years.

[RouletteGhost]

very simple

i was writing the baccarat results from left to right in rows of 3 (9 decisions total)

then I would play vertically that the above would not repeat...(in layman's terms betting against 9 decisions back if you will)

i did not like the results on the 2nd shoe i tested so i reversed it to betting for repeats vertically

1, 2, 4 progression. if lose take the 7 unit loss and reset to 1 unit, on a win stop playing that vertical

the last 2 sheets i posted signify that

1st shoe i had ONE 3 step bust which yielded +7 at end of shoe and second shoe had TWO 3 step busts which yielded +5 at end of shoe

sounds complicated but very simple

-write the results horizontally left to right, 9 decisions

-then play vertically for a decision to repeat

-each "vertical" is its own game, if you lose a bet and you move to next bet, do not continue progression, only when you get back to that specific column do you continue progression after a loss

-layman's terms, bet for same as 9 decisions back only using a progression after a loss in that specific column, each column is its own game and they have nothing to do with one another and have their own progressions

if you analyze the sheet you may get it..... ill test further in google sheets

after a win, i no longer bet that column until that 3 decision block is done

depending on how its going i can bet 9 times out of 9 or only 3 out of 9 so electronic baccarat is best...dont think dealer will let me sit out 6 hands

no doubt i will be quoted by Mr J later, will be fun when i retaliate and trigger him

[DoctorSudoku]

very simple

i was writing the baccarat results from left to right in rows of 3 (9 decisions total)

then I would play vertically that the above would not repeat...(in layman's terms betting against 9 decisions back if you will)

i did not like the results on the 2nd shoe i tested so i reversed it to betting for repeats vertically

1, 2, 4 progression. if lose take the 7 unit loss and reset to 1 unit, on a win stop playing that vertical

the last 2 sheets i posted signify that

1st shoe i had ONE 3 step bust which yielded +7 at end of shoe and second shoe had TWO 3 step busts which yielded +5 at end of shoe

sounds complicated but very simple

-write the results horizontally left to right, 9 decisions

-then play vertically for a decision to repeat

-each "vertical" is its own game, if you lose a bet and you move to next bet, do not continue progression, only when you get back to that specific column do you continue progression after a loss

-layman's terms, bet for same as 9 decisions back only using a progression after a loss in that specific column, each column is its own game and they have nothing to do with one another and have their own progressions

if you analyze the sheet you may get it..... ill test further in google sheets

after a win, i no longer bet that column until that 3 decision block is done

depending on how its going i can bet 9 times out of 9 or only 3 out of 9 so electronic baccarat is best...dont think dealer will let me sit out 6 hands

no doubt i will be quoted by Mr J later, will be fun when i retaliate and trigger him

Rich,
Thanks for the detailed explanation.

Definitely worth testing out with real baccarat shoes.

[DoctorSudoku]

And don't worry about what they say over on that other forum.

Keep doing your stuff.      

[RouletteGhost]

ive tested with several REAL baccarat shoes and I have tested with the computer generated wizard of odds shoes (Following are 1000 randomly generated baccarat shoes. The shoe contained eight decks)

TOTALLY different results...man I hate RNG

[RouletteGhost]

if anyone wants to post some shoes that they may have in their stash ill test them

[RouletteGhost]

Live shoe from celtic casino feed/bet phoenix feed (same)

My results was +2 units....now I just do not know how to handle ties yet.....both progression losses had tie involved in some way....now I know tie is a push....but for testing purposes, shoe was a WIN

silly strategy? maybe....at this point just for fun

[RouletteGhost]

OK I got it

if there its a TIE decision I will NOT play the NEXT vertical game following it

doing so the above shoe was a total of ONE 3 step progression loss (-7 units) and (+13)

shoe would have been +6

I am having good results on live, not RNG

[praline]

good results on live, not RNG

Yeah.. random live is better then random rng...

[praline]

Forgot to add....