My friend has opened a new Baccarat.

[bikemotorman]

Ok here is today's test results craps pass don't pass decisions.



Stuart 

[bikemotorman]

I use a 12345 progression up one on a loss, down two on a win always starting at one unit as our base BET.

The above results are hand tossed by me and are about 3 hours worth of work my practice craps table has the real pyramid rubber back on the end of the table and from what the experts in craps say tends to randomize the dice.

No, I am not trying to get anybody to do anything, but just showing an outside the box approach that many profit from in Baccarat and adapted it to Craps.

[psimoes]

Sorry, where is the outside the box approach you mention?

[ego]

Now I have joined the paid membership, feels great to only talk with people like Ellis and others who really are into even money bets.

Cheers

[bikemotorman]

Yes I know he has years of success and I am not knocking anybody here but there are so many trolls and just people who really want to cause harm to others.


Stuart

[bikemotorman]

WE NEED TO GO WITH THE FLOW SO WE CAN capture a profitable trend in the ebb and flow of craps decisions.

[psimoes]

Ok

[DoctorSudoku]

I use a 12345 progression up one on a loss, down two on a win always starting at one unit as our base BET.

The above results are hand tossed by me and are about 3 hours worth of work my practice craps table has the real pyramid rubber back on the end of the table and from what the experts in craps say tends to randomize the dice.

No, I am not trying to get anybody to do anything, but just showing an outside the box approach that many profit from in Baccarat and adapted it to Craps.

This is a modified D'Alembert that you are using, but what do you do when you bet with 5 units -- and you lose?

Do you stay at 5 units or do you reset back at 1 unit?

[ego]

Is the name U1D2 and stands for up 1 down 2 - is that correct?

Cheers

[bikemotorman]

If you lose the five unit play it seldom happens but I just stop playing and retrack.

Ellis says go back to one unit.

Stuart

[bikemotorman]

Well, one more great test my hand tossing the dice in a random fashion no dice setting at all.





Stuart 

[DoctorSudoku]

Is the name U1D2 and stands for up 1 down 2 - is that correct?

Cheers

Yes, it is (as far as I know).

It is basically a modified D 'Alembert method.

[bikemotorman]

No Doc it is not modified anything its just up one on a loss down two on a win.



Stuart

[DoctorSudoku]

No Doc it is not modified anything its just up one on a loss down two on a win.



Stuart

Stuart,
There are very strong similarities between the two.

The original D'Alembert is up one unit  on a loss and down one unit on a win -- so it is basically U1D1.

Ellis's method is up one unit on a loss and down two units on a win -- in other words, it is U1D2.

That is why I said  it looks like a modified D'Alembert progression.

[ego]

What happens with this forum board I join, now I can not access as it does not exist. Hope is a just temporary issue.

Cheers