The Holy Truth

[Blueprint]

You can't stop that thief. He keeps taking an apple every 37 minutes. The only way to increase your amount of apples is if your trees are growing them faster than the thief takes them away.

[nottophammer]

Okay Steve it's 1/37

[Steve]

Notto, I have a sense of humor. They arent funny. You could at least put more thought into it.

[Steve]

Be original. Bet you've never seen this.

[nottophammer]

I've seen that as many times i've read your statement 1/37

BORING

[TurboGenius]

37 minutes later, someone steals another. You have 98 left. It's no big deal.
Keep going. It's no big deal.

Sure if you count reds and blacks normally spinning around the same amount of time after 1,000 spins. You might call that a "pattern", and it's predictable, but you can't use it to change the odds.

In the other analogy - someone works a job and earns money. The state and gov't taxes that money (takes a percentage) over and over and over - yet people still get rich who know how to do it.
The "tax" on roulette (house edge) doesn't prevent any player from winning long term.
Neither would it if there were no house edge but you gave the dealer a 2 or 3 percent "tip" on each spin. You could still win long term.

Reds/Blacks and even money never give a predictable pattern. Other data does though.

So Steve - give me an example of something in roulette that can be predicted.
Something to put in that column of things that are incredibly likely to happen.
You seem to believe nothing is going to happen in future spins that a person could
use to their advantage but that's not true. So list one (or a few). Hell, to start they can even be easy ones.
ex. There will be at least one number that will repeat in 37 spins.
or One street can go 100 spins without appearing (true)
there are TONS, just name a few. Then you can maybe begin to see what can
be exploited and what can't.
Or you can say "nothing is predictable, nothing ever happens.. all players who play lose"
which is nonsense.

[Roulettebeater]

Like if you bet 1 number, normally you win 1 in 37 times on average. But if you increase accuracy of predictions, you change the odds to say 1 win every 15 spins. Then who cares if the payout in 35-1.

Its a simple but critical concept.

Ok understood
I wrote the same yesterday in another threwad on this point

Thx for the confirmation

[Bigbroben]

If I can show you a pattern that happens almost every single time you run off spins - then surely you can make a chart just like the ones I posted..

Turbo,
when you say ''pattern'', do you mean a sequence of numbers that have a precise relation one to another, or approximate relation one to another?  Is there a specific length, like a pattern, or variable length?  Or is it one single relationship between 2 nrs,( like: +/- 1 between a spin and the 4th before)?

[Roulettebeater]

I personally think and I am backed by Steve, that increasing accuracy of predictions is only possible with help of physic, in other words the cause-effect model is the way to make accurate predictions, all others patterns, hotties, coldies etc are nonsense because there is no cause-effect relation in them.

[TurboGenius]

Turbo,
when you say ''pattern'', do you mean a sequence of numbers that have a precise relation one to another, or approximate relation one to another?  Is there a specific length, like a pattern, or variable length?  Or is it one single relationship between 2 nrs,( like: +/- 1 between a spin and the 4th before)?

A pattern can be in the numbers and how they appear or even a visual pattern on the table.
You can re-arrange the numbers also in any way that you want (or randomly, etc) and in the next cycle the same pattern will appear.
If I know a pattern is going to happen and I bet on the last puzzle piece to appear - I win when it does. If it never appears, it's not a good pattern to use.
In my case I have a simple way to use multiple patterns while the game is playing out and I only need one of the patterns to complete to win.
So in a "Beautiful Mind" moment someone (Steve for example) can look at the board and see no pattern. I see it though. He can say it doesn't mean sh*t for future spins but my pattern will complete, or one of them will.. and I win.
I'm using this example of pattern play this week online at Parx and posted the chart, it's been dramatically increasing as well as I choose the most reliable patterns to use and dismiss the others.

[Steve]

The state and gov't taxes that money (takes a percentage) over and over and over - yet people still get rich who know how to do it.

people gain wealth despite tax because their income exceeds expenses.

Tax is a bad comparison. Its not like the house edge. Tax is paid only from profit. The house edge drains you all the way to $0.

The "tax" on roulette (house edge) doesn't prevent any player from winning long term.

The house edge is more like the apple thief example. He will drain you until theres nothing left.  He wont limit what he steals.

Reds/Blacks and even money never give a predictable pattern. Other data does though.

What if instead of betting individual repeating numbers you bet the number's colors? You wouldnt have an edge? It's a contradiction.

So Steve - give me an example of something in roulette that can be predicted.
Something to put in that column of things that are incredibly likely to happen.

Ok. The ball will fall as it loses momentum. A dependable pattern.

You seem to believe nothing is going to happen in future spins that a person could
use to their advantage but that's not true.

I'm not saying that. I'm saying repeaters have no correlation to future spins, and using them for bet selection is no better than random bets.

There will be at least one number that will repeat in 37 spins.
or One street can go 100 spins without appearing (true)
there are TONS, just name a few.

You said it all before. You still arent knowing which numbers will repeat this  time and which wont. You'll still be a little bit wrong and end up about -2.7%. A coincidental number?

Turbo id love to see something new. All your old black and white videos show nothing of substance. And i still haven't seen a single thing that's a proof of concept. Again everything points the other way.

[Bigbroben]

I choose the most reliable patterns to use and dismiss the others.

Ok, so I just imagine: give a few spins, check for patterns ( could take a while to note or its an obvious find?), bet accordingly and discard if too many fails with one of the chosen?

When they come, they come way more often than 1 in 37, or slightly above?

[jekhb76]

For anyone Who doesn't know what a minimum interval means.

Minimum interval is the least amount of spins that any location
showed and then showed again.

Cheers,
Ed

[nottophammer]

Ross remember said 6 zeros



To all now at;



the question is what's the progression and how many bankroll resets

[nottophammer]

look at the checkpoint box.
spins 11-40; 15 repeats and 15 non-hit