• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Odds and payouts are different things. If either the odds or payouts don't change, then the result is the same - eventual loss.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

PATTERN CREATOR V1.0 © 2018 jekhb

Started by jekhb76, May 04, 05:44 PM 2018

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Roulettebeater

Quote from: cht on May 05, 10:56 AM 2018
I can only tell you guys the real stuff as it is.

Look at the payout listing online live dealer baccarat. You see up to $30k per hand.

You do not see such payout level in roulette.

In b&m casino, you get to see $50k per hand baccarat. Not in roulette tables.

For roulette we talk about getting ban as advantage player for winning small stakes regularly.

WTF ?!?!?!

Ok, this is a roulette forum. Enjoy. :thumbsup:


Nonsense what you saying !
What makes a casino ban a successful roulette player and not a successful Baccarat player !

The casino see all players same whatever games they play, once they start winning regularly they put them on the black list
A dollar won is twice as sweet as as a dollar earned

cht

Quote from: Roulettebeater on May 05, 11:11 AM 2018

Nonsense what you saying !
What makes a casino ban a successful roulette player and not a successful Baccarat player !

The casino see all players same whatever games they play, once they start winning regularly they put them on the black list
Well, you have not seen baccarat players win $10+million. You need to have membership to the high roller casino.:)

Roulettebeater

Roulette is more famous that baccarat.

Baccarat is only famous in South Asia...
A dollar won is twice as sweet as as a dollar earned

cht

Read this top gambling cities in the world.

link:s://stopandstep.com/top-gambling-cities-in-the-world/

Macau and Singapore occupy the top 3 rank. Las Vegas is not the top rank.

70% of their table games on offer is baccarat. By gambling revenue the figure is very high.

Visit their public casino floor there to get the real facts about gambling in the largest city - see with your eyes the real money flow.

fossell

I like your thinking outside the box Jek. If you see something happen everytime, then why not create something to take advantage of that.
I've not tested yet and hey there's no reason to stick to one method of play if you find another that can work too.
Why not play this by placing on your single hotties aswell when removing your adjacent positions? Just a thought.

Andre Chass

Quote from: cht on May 05, 10:06 AM 2018
People waste so much time to find winning roulette system. Let's not call it HG.

Without advantage play based on math it's impossible to find this winning system.

People don't realise that it's a lot easier to find winning baccarat system.
Why roulette ?

Played only 1Euro bets for fun my off day today.

If you can produce this kind of results with real baccarat shoes then you know you have a winning system.
RX or simulator is not good enough - they are just for testing purpose.

CHT

You right!

Baccarat is the game!

I still play roulette sometimes but baccarat is giving me much more positive results.
Nothing ventured, nothing gained...

daveylibra

HI JEK !
I love this idea, because we know when to stop! 37 spins. Systems that want you to bet 100s of spins are not for me! And flat-bet! Goes along with what I am saying on the Building an Optimum System thread.
If it performs as you say on the 1st page I think there is no need to keep tweaking it, just test.
I would like to run off loads of tests on rx, but I think it would be v. difficult to code.
Just to confirm how you play. I undertsand the basic idea. Suppose-
12 hits. Bet 9,11,15
9 hits. Win. take off 9,11,15
6 hits. We only cover 3 and 5, as 9 has already been used.
We also cannot use 11and 15 again as they have been used already.
Have I got this right?
Cheers- Dave

ahlidap

Is 3 covering chips the rule?
What happen if you hit the middle row, like number 8?

Do you cover 5, 7, 9, 11 ?

nottophammer

Quote from: ahlidap on May 06, 02:27 PM 2018Do you cover 5, 7, 9, 11 ?

I would and if say next spin was #6 this would be 3,5,9 althou 5,9 have a unit i'd place another unit on them.

Ed will tell you
How do you win at roulette, simple, make the right decision

valvo

Hi Jek
Thanks for your system but I still can't see how its played, Is there any chance you could go through blow by blow of the numbers you have already put up? I ran through my RX but didn't get the same results as you. Spin 12 #33 hits but then you get a hit on #32

Thanks

Val

poluvolo

Hi jek
great job but.....  still have questions
So
29
14
14
31
14
1
5
12
27
25
16
25
36
14
2
2
3
7
10
33
this sequence has 20 spins for my local casino
I WONDER IF YOU COULD NOTE SPIN BY SPIN ALL NUMBERS MUST BETTING WITHOUT ABSOLUTELY MORE EXPLANATION
JUST THE NMBERS MUST BET SPIN BY SPIN
I THINK THAT IS DIFFICULT SEQUENCE EXCEPT LAST 5 SPINS
THANKS A LOT
MICHAEL

jekhb76

Quote from: poluvolo on May 07, 02:19 AM 2018
Hi jek
great job but.....  still have questions
So
29
14
14
31
14
1
5
12
27
25
16
25
36
14
2
2
3
7
10
33
this sequence has 20 spins for my local casino
I WONDER IF YOU COULD NOTE SPIN BY SPIN ALL NUMBERS MUST BETTING WITHOUT ABSOLUTELY MORE EXPLANATION
JUST THE NMBERS MUST BET SPIN BY SPIN
I THINK THAT IS DIFFICULT SEQUENCE EXCEPT LAST 5 SPINS
THANKS A LOT
MICHAEL
It's not that hard really, once you get it.
What we are doin' is force the wheel to build up connection with every fallen number. Somehow it does All the Time, well almost all the Time.

29 (we bet the connected numbers plus the Center number.
So in this case we have 29 as our Centre number. We now place bets of one unit on #29,#26,#28,#32)
14 (we bet #14,#11,#13,#15,#17)
14 HIT (we stay on these numbers again, because there is No connection Just yet)
31 bet #31,#28,#32,#34)
14 HIT continue, No connection.
1 bet #1,#0,#2,#4)
5 bet #5,#2,#6,#8)
12 bet #12,#9,#11,#15
27 bet #27,#24,#26,#30
25 bet #25,#22,#26,#28
16 bet #16,#13,#17,#19
25 HIT No connection continue.
36 bet #36,#33,#35
14 HIT No connection continue.
2 HIT connection remove All numbers around #1 (#1 & #2 are now connected)
2 No betting already connected.
3 No betting already connected with 2
7 bet #7,#4,#8,#10
10 HIT connection with #7 remove All bets around #7.
33 HIT connection with #36 remove All bets around #33.

And continue as above.
Not that realy hard, once you get it.
Remember that when a number is connected we won't be betting that number again for our session. We try to connect every fallen number. Until one is left.
We've had 7 HITS in 20 spins, not bad!
Hope this helped.
Cheers. Ed

valvo

Can you explain connect please? How are they connected?

jekhb76

Quote from: daveylibra on May 06, 06:54 AM 2018
HI JEK !
I love this idea, because we know when to stop! 37 spins. Systems that want you to bet 100s of spins are not for me! And flat-bet! Goes along with what I am saying on the Building an Optimum System thread.
If it performs as you say on the 1st page I think there is no need to keep tweaking it, just test.
I would like to run off loads of tests on rx, but I think it would be v. difficult to code.
Just to confirm how you play. I undertsand the basic idea. Suppose-
12 hits. Bet 9,11,15
9 hits. Win. take off 9,11,15
6 hits. We only cover 3 and 5, as 9 has already been used.
We also cannot use 11and 15 again as they have been used already.
Have I got this right?
Cheers- Dave
No not Right. Number 11 and 15 can be used again if nessesary, because they haven't had a connection yet with the already hitted numbers. Once one of these number are also hitted, then they Have a connection not before. Hope that it makes clear.
Cheers

jekhb76

Quote from: fossell on May 05, 01:18 PM 2018
I like your thinking outside the box Jek. If you see something happen everytime, then why not create something to take advantage of that.
I've not tested yet and hey there's no reason to stick to one method of play if you find another that can work too.
Why not play this by placing on your single hotties aswell when removing your adjacent positions? Just a thought.
Will get into it, to improve my System.
Thanks for the compliment and Help.
Cheers.

-