Top secret - your opinion needed

[Roulettebeater]

Yes because your software is probably junk. 

Oh General, you are the typical troll who loves the shit out of himself

[The General]

Roulettebeater,

What is it that you feel makes the software work.  How does it operate, what type of data do you input?

[Roulettebeater]

Roulettebeater,

What is it that you feel makes the software work.  How does it operate, what type of data do you input?

General
You are killing any constructive  discussion with your late replies !

Either you reply promptly or let it be, i have no time to regather all the ideas back and write them down..
Anyway I will tell you something, my software requires the last 4 spins with the revelant spins directions and the launching point, the software tries to capture/ simulate the speed of the ball and rotor, then the predicted output is used to estimate the most possible winning numbers

[The General]

General
You are killing any constructive  discussion with your late replies !


Anyway I will tell you something, my software requires the last 4 spins with the revelant spins directions and the launching point, the software tries to capture/ simulate the speed of the ball and rotor, then the predicted output is used to estimate the most possible winning numbers

Only the last four spins?
How can it capture accurate ball speed if you're looking at an online video feed?  Missing frames, herky jerky video quality, I'm sorry but I suspect your predictions aren't very good.

[Roulettebeater]

Only the last four spins?
How can it capture accurate ball speed if you're looking at an online video feed?  Missing frames, herky jerky video quality, I'm sorry but I suspect your predictions aren't very good.

Dude
You have to stop underestimating the people !

I will tell you a tip, if you take these two numbers 4-33, for the scope of simplicity we will consider  the rotor speed  stable at 5 seconds, you can estimate the ball speed based on the last two numbers and in this case the speed was 17,45
Still unclear ?

[The General]

Dude
You have to stop underestimating the people !

I will tell you a tip, if you take these two numbers 4-33, for the scope of simplicity we will consider  the rotor speed  stable at 5 seconds, you can estimate the ball speed based on the last two numbers and in this case the speed was 17,45
Still unclear ?

Yes, still unclear.

What do 4-33 have to do with anything?  How are you estimating the ball speed based on the last two numbers 4-33?

When you say the ball speed was 17.45 I'm assuming that you're referring to the total ball travel time, and if so, why? 
That doesn't mean that the next ball travel time will be the same.

What about a ball scatter profile?  I see no mention of it.  Have you ever plotted one for the online whee that you're looking at?

[Roulettebeater]

Yes, still unclear.

What do 4-33 have to do with anything?  How are you estimating the ball speed based on the last two numbers 4-33?

When you say the ball speed was 17.45 I'm assuming that you're referring to the total ball travel time, and if so, why? 
That doesn't mean that the next ball travel time will be the same.

What about a ball scatter profile?  I see no mention of it.  Have you ever plotted one for the online whee that you're looking at?

Well
Finding out the last ball speed is important for me, why ?
Because I have a huge sample of spins, I check that speed against the sample and get the most probable speed for the next spin.

[The General]

Well
Finding out the last ball speed is important for me, why ?
Because I have a huge sample of spins, I check that speed against the sample and get the most probable speed for the next spin.

Are you attempting to play visual ballistics?

or

Are you attempting some kind of dealer's signature?

What about the ball bounce scatter profile?

[Roulettebeater]

Are you attempting to play visual ballistics?

or

Are you attempting some kind of dealer's signature?

What about the ball bounce scatter profile?

i have huge sample of data ... my system uses a very simple logic:

cause and effect, if you find out the previous speed, then check it against the sample of data..you will get a clue.
i use that clue to predict the sector of the wheel the ball will most probably fall on... this system is giving me an edge.

[The General]

i have huge sample of data ... my system uses a very simple logic:

cause and effect, if you find out the previous speed, then check it against the sample of data..you will get a clue.
i use that clue to predict the sector of the wheel the ball will most probably fall on... this system is giving me an edge.

Ok then, show us some relevant data that supports your idea.

[The General]

Roulettebeater,

Here's what I'd be interested in seeing.  A standard deviation graph or just a regular graph representing how many pockets your predicted numbers were from the actual.

[Roulettebeater]

Roulettebeater,

Here's what I'd be interested in seeing.  A standard deviation graph or just a regular graph representing how many pockets your predicted numbers were from the actual.

drop me a pm, we will get this done together.

[The General]

What happened?

No data?

[Herby]

What happened?
No data?

Dude
the speed was 17,45
Still unclear ?

No units    
- it's a no go for physicists

example: thermal conductivity   units:  BTU/(hr ft °F) 

All clear ? no units = no data

[Roulettebeater]

Hey general
I just replied! Sorry I was having fun with some escorts in the town