The General Verses Turbo Roulette Challenge

[TurboGenius]

* The only credible results are MPR and you have a negative win rate.

So I need to stop going to Parx in PA, and stop going to AC and just play at your MPR game, got it - thanks. That will save me some driving time at least.
any other site/simulators are rigged and have no value. Got it.
I learned a lot this morning.
And remember folks - click the link to learn how computers beat roulette -
and bias wobbling wheels can make you a fortune.
Turbo is misleading - the more results he posts, the more sources he uses, the more misleading he obviously is.

What a headache, I just woke up and now this lol

[TurboGenius]

I told you. Every now and then, a new self-professed guru comes along and misleads people.

Yes, I'm the downfall of roulette system discussions because I show results that aren't in line with what's acceptable. Time to go make some money, enjoy your day.

[Steve]

It's not important to you that Player A bets $100.00 chips and Player B uses $10.00 chips - NO NO the math is the same, except when it isn't the same right ?
Sure, I'm misleading - I don't know simple math, I get it.

Seriously turbo. Its not complicated. A guy with $1m is more likely to win $1m, than a guy with just $100. So who do you think is more likely to rank on parx?

The math is the same. Always. The problem is you don't understand it, or what more experienced players are saying. I'm convinced you partly-believe your nonsense.

[jekhb76]

What a load of shit turbo. It has nothing to do with mine or Caleb's preferred methods. It has to do with truth vs utter bullshit.

It's simple:

* The only credible results are MPR and you have a negative win rate.

* Since your win rate on MPR became negative, you avoid MPR now and prefer RS where admin video records your sessions.

* Your theories are PROVABLY backwards and incorrect. Anyone can easily do testing and debunk your theories. I gave precise details numerous times.

* Your claims and theories have blatant contradictions. It from poor understanding.

* You spent a lot of time winning play money on rigged games to get recognition. You claim free money and bonuses is not an edge.

* Parx being rigged is not an opinion, but you still fight for this point without doing the math. It's really not complicated. Also the betting limits on both RS and Parx are ridiculously unrealistic.

* If you could win millions in such a short time, you'd be doing it.

* You play the victim, like you are being picked on. Poor Turbo. You are parading around flashing Parx and RS results claiming to have the "never lose HG". For attention? Who knows. Inexperienced players follow blindly, and you waste their time. The experienced players reveal the problems with your claims, and rightfully so because your story is full of gaping wide holes. You are still even claiming Parx is not rigged. The math is right in front of your face and you still deny it.

The experienced players?
Who do call Experience player?
And i don't, follow blindly... And i'm An experienced player. I play roulette for over 25 years now  the only way to win More and lose less with this game is by playing hotnumbers. Even you Steven can't deny that. If you do, then you are less experienced then me 

[Steve]

Yes, I'm the downfall of roulette system discussions because I show results that aren't in line with what's acceptable.

No, you're just another self-professed guru misleading inexperienced players, and you want everyone to think you're the victim.

Time to go make some money, enjoy your day.

I hope its real this time.

[jekhb76]

I told you. Every now and then, a new self-professed guru comes along and misleads people. Then cries victim. The inexperienced followers, who don't understand simple logic and math, defend the guru. It has happened many times before.

Sorry Steve, but you're the one that don't understand simple logic ! Numbers do repeat you know, Just as our world turns. What if i told you that within a few hours it's gonna be dark again, would you call me then a liar also?
It's Just simple math Steve, even you can do it  1 Will become 2 and 2 Will become 3 and so on. Just simple as 123. But i guess you didn't learn that at kindergarten.

[Steve]

Hot numbers? 25 years experience?

Jekh, i'm not sure what to say. Its probably the oldest and most tested fallacy of all. Its not my concern if you waste your own time.

[Steve]

Right. Numbers repeat. So go bet on repeaters. Make a fool of me and every casino.

[jekhb76]

Yes, I'm the downfall of roulette system discussions because I show results that aren't in line with what's acceptable. Time to go make some money, enjoy your day.

Have a good day, and thanks for stopping buy to give Steve a kick in his butt. Maybe after this he will understand simple logic and simple math! Oh wait what am i saying ? He's still in kindergarden leaning how to make Special Services....

[jekhb76]

Hot numbers? 25 years experience?

Jekh, i'm not sure what to say. Its probably the oldest and most tested fallacy of all. Its not my concern if you waste your own time.

Well as Long as i'm winning More then i lose it's ok by me.

[jekhb76]

Right. Numbers repeat. So go bet on repeaters. Make a fool of me and every casino.

Well i don't Have to make a fool of you, you do that yourself.

[Steve]

Fascinating to see this. Only if you knew.

And like I said, the inexperienced players defend the self-professed guru, who's actually misleading people. History repeats

Anyway go get them casinos.

[jekhb76]

Fascinating to see this. Only if you knew.

And like I said, the inexperienced players defend the self-professed guru, who's actually misleading people. History repeats

Anyway go get them casinos.

[The General]

Well i don't Have to make a fool of you, you do that yourself.

Jekhb76,

Do you believe that Turbo's method works?  Has it worked for you?

[nottophammer]

Do you believe that Turbo's method works? 

Yes.
Why should it not work, i know nothing wins forever and that must include you, But it's like what most on here would say, as long as it wins more than it lose, then that's good enough for me