• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

The only way to beat roulette is by increasing accuracy of predictions (changing the odds). This is possible on many real wheels.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

MODI 1

Started by Bigbroben, May 24, 10:26 AM 2018

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 14 Guests are viewing this topic.

junscissorhands

I'm not here to prove anything, but I play on terminals and airball, I'm quite bored as I play mechanically.i like to sparkle up some forums and get people thinking.

It's take it or leave it, but if you take my info and go deeper with it you might find something useful out of it. As long you test enough and don't gamble with real money before you get "it".
Don't be so naive.

RouletteGhost

all im saying is if you found a way to consistently win, like an ATM machine, then what people think of your on a forum wouldnt be a bother
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

junscissorhands

Sergio.

Both sides..

And 8.

Not possible.

Don't be so naive.

junscissorhands

If you read my posts, do I seem bothered? I don't give fuck what people think about me, I just have my say here and that's it.

I might come across as negative or aggressive, but some of my posts contain true value. I don't post stupid fallacy stuff after 3 reds and one black bet red, or black high odd bet red low even that sort of recycled shit after ziliions of years.
Don't be so naive.

junscissorhands

Been there done that. Won't work, Sergio. I've tried ALL possibilities of 8 numbers.
Don't be so naive.

Kanam

I would like to see Vaddis face when he read all that.If he read it.BY the way ,after some logical conclusions I believe David is living in the same city as I am.

Kanam

Quote from: junscissorhands on Jul 17, 08:31 PM 2018
Been there done that. Won't work, Sergio. I've tried ALL possibilities of 8 numbers.

Sergio is talking about utilizing some triggers.

Kanam

Quote from: junscissorhands on Jul 17, 08:31 PM 2018
Been there done that. Won't work, Sergio. I've tried ALL possibilities of 8 numbers.

I really like that 8 numbers idea.Easy to play.

junscissorhands

I know the triggers, the past 8 spins shows the triggers. But it won't work longterm. It's a slow death.
Don't be so naive.

Kanam

Quote from: junscissorhands on Jul 17, 08:39 PM 2018
I know the triggers, the past 8 spins shows the triggers. But it won't work longterm. It's a slow death.

Maybe 8 spins observation and only a few spins betting after that.

junscissorhands

Completely wrong that's not vaddis the pairings are completely wrong, you my friend do not have a clue about vaddi's play.
Don't be so naive.

RouletteGhost

Quote from: junscissorhands on Jul 17, 08:46 PM 2018
Completely wrong that's not vaddis the pairings are completely wrong, you my friend do not have a clue about vaddi's play.

noone really knows vaddi play because he never disclosed it

he gave hints and clues just like everyone else

everything surrounding it is pure speculation
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

Kanam

Quote from: PassionRuleta on Jul 17, 08:41 PM 2018
Look I will give an idea of ​​a way that is one step ahead of what should be done according to vaddis and that even so it works well for the always echo that one of the two has to create the repetition.
Wait for a couple to come out and play in a short range of balls.
If another one is added, and so on, as there will be few pairs that you incorporate into your game because they will be only those that have come out in short gaps, you will quickly start to take hits, if those couples are within the small gap they can continue playing, if they pass from the short gap they will have to be eliminated.
Anytime we are positive, we reset the game and play again.
Example:

27-23-2-14-29-24 - pair 23-24 came out in a gap of 5 balls.
We will play this couple and continue to see numbers next.
27-23-2-14-29-24-36-8-13- couple 13-14 enter to play as well.
27-23-2-14-29-24-36-8-13-23 - correct pair 23-24, is within a small gap we look at our balance if we are positive we start a new session, if we are negative this couple continues Playing.
27-23-2-14-29-24-36-8-13-23-2-4-6-33-0-28- We do not take the pair 27-28, it's a gap too long, we do not want to play many couples.
27-23-2-14-29-24-36-8-13-23-2-4-6-33-0-28-31-31-14- hit 13-14, we look gap is too long, this couple stops playing until it forms in a short gap.
As long as we have a favorable balance we start a totally new session.
This form is something based only for repetitions, of each pair that is formed with time one of the two numbers will fall as repeated, law of the third 24 only 12 repeated- 2: 1.
I hope you like it and tell me that, I hope I have explained well.
regards

PS: surely many of you will not have so many complaints that I do not say anything, this is not vaddis, but if there is something and balance of repeated ones, but in a different way.

Sergio ,why it is 5 balls gap ,not 4 or 8 for example?

Kanam

I am already said in the past that it is very possible that everyone has their own version of Vaddis system based on his concept and everyone think that its a genuine one.

RouletteGhost

the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

-