• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Test the accuracy of your method to predict the winning number. If it works, then your system works. But tests over a few hundred spins tell you nothing.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

(No subject)

Started by ego, Jun 02, 04:22 AM 2018

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

nottophammer

As much as i'd like to believe the old wind bag, can he prove it, he ask's Turbo, so it's up to each individual. Me "nah" we see wheels being realigned, in the quiet part of the day see the level out, inspection of the ring, pads you name it they know
How do you win at roulette, simple, make the right decision

jekhb76

Just encounterd my First loss of my 600+ euro bankroll playing the parachute as expllained.  :yawn: :sad2:
Not a single hit during the parachute approach of my selectes number. Three hits within 25 spins and hoping that either the parachute or the number (Both) would hit before spin 75!!
Nope.... :yawn:

Taotie


jekhb76

Quote from: Taotie on Jun 07, 09:07 AM 2018
bad news jek
Yes, well i thought i would atleast get 1 hit for certain before spin 75. That was not the case.
And i did play exact as it was explained.

ego

Quote from: ego on Jun 05, 05:00 AM 2018
Find a losing session at session 36:

1. Parachute Win Number Win
2. Parachute Win Number Win
3. Parachute Win Number Win
4. Parachute Win Number Loss
5. Parachute Win Number Loss
6. Parachute Win Number Win
7. Parachute Win Number Win
8. Parachute Win Number Win
9. Parachute Win Number Win
10. Parachute Win Number Win
11. Parachute Win Number Win
12. Parachute Win Number Win
13. Parachute Win Number Win
14. Parachute Win Number Win
15. Parachute Win Number Win
16. Parachute Win Number Win
17. Parachute Win Number Win
18. Parachute Win Number Win
19. Parachute Win Number Win
20. Parachute Win Number Loss
21. Parachute Win Number Win
22. Parachute Win Number Loss
23. Parachute Win Number Win
24. Parachute Win Number Win
25. Parachute Win Number Loss
26. Parachute Win Number Win
27. Parachute Win Number Win
28. Parachute Win Number Win
29. Parachute Win Number Win
30. Parachute Win Number Win
31. Parachute Win Number Loss
32. Parachute Win Number Loss
33. Parachute Win Number Win
34. Parachute Win Number Win
35. Parachute Win Number Win
36. Parachute Loss Number Loss

Sorry for your loss and I know I show that the parachute loss after only 36 games.

I have been playing the parachute at Leo Vegas Casino without losing, but not this method I wrote about in this topic.
Did play each time one location hit for one repeat so I got into singles versus series.

Cheers
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ego


I will make two videos and upload them to youtube and show the original.
Will explain the tweaks and the original work so you can continue the development by your self.

Cheers
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

jekhb76

Quote from: ego on Jun 07, 10:52 AM 2018
I will make two videos and upload them to youtube and show the original.
Will explain the tweaks and the original work so you can continue the development by your self.

Cheers
Thanks, that would be very helpful.  :thumbsup:

Bigbroben

How about playing a nr that slept for 100 spins?
Life is hard, and then you die.
Mes pensées sont le dernier retranchement de ma liberté.

ego

Quote from: Bigbroben on Jun 07, 09:45 PM 2018
How about playing a nr that slept for 100 spins?

Yes, that can be done but is not much different than my idea.
25 attempts equal an even money bet so one single number sleeping for 100 trails is the same as see four missing reds or blacks.
This means you would have the odds 1 in 16 using patterns of four.

Now I will make some videos during this weekend and explain faults and errors I discover and how I see different ways around them with other solutions.

Cheers
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ego

Now I will show a Parachute I play and won some money with at Leo Vegas, but I notice an error and fault in the selection process.
Play Follow The Last where i aim that not getting Seven Singles in a row, so at least one series would occur.

If I see Low I bet Low once, if I lose I bet the dozen next for two attempts.
Now if I lose again then I play line and so it continues until I get one repeat and start over.

The fault and error playing singles versus series and follow the last are that you can get a hit within one location two times before you play that location and then you got your series and miss out the opportunity.
Is not working playing follow the last.

At the end of the video, you see the line hit three times with the third bet as the winning bet.
Where you only aim for one repeat once to get singles versus series.
That is the fault and error.

I will upload more sample with other tactics and comment on them.

link:s://youtu.be/myQmxNZCh4k

In the end, when playing the line 14 hits two times during the betting on a dozen for two times.
That is the fault and error using FTL and happens with many different combinations during the game.

Cheers
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ego

I want to show a comparison using binomial probability where one location equals an even money bet versus cycles for each location.
The first sample is eight even money bets using the table locations. Here we use eight locations eight times to cover eight in a row.
The second sample use cycles and only seven locations to cover same probability and spread as the first one.
Not sure what difference this makes, but it feels greater to stay longer at each location using cycles then binomial EC probability.

First Sample - EC probability

1. EC   1   +1

2. Dozen   1   +1
3. Dozen   1   +0

4. Line   1   +3
5. Line   1   +2
6. Line   1   +1
7. Line   1   +0

8. Corner   1   +1
9. Corner   1   -1
10. Corner   2   +7
11. Corner   2   +5
12. Corner   2   +3
13. Corner   2   +1

14. Street  2   +3
15. Street  2   +1
16. Street  3   +9
17. Street  3   +6
18. Street  3   +3
19. Street  3   +0    
20. Street  4   +7
21. Street  4   +3

22. Split   4   +19
23. Split   4   +15
24. Split   4   +11
25. Split   4   +9
26. Split   4   +5
27. Split   4   +1       
28. Split   5   +11
29. Split   5   +6
30. Split   5   +1       
31. Split   6   +11
32. Split   6   +5
33. Split    6   -1 98
      
34. Single   3   +8
35. Single   3   +5
36. Single   3   +2
37. Single  3   +1       
38. Single  4   +31
39. Single   4   +27
40. Single   4   +23
41. Single   4   +19
42. Single  4   +15
43. Single  4   +11
44. Single   4   +7 
45. Single   4   +3
46. Single   4   -1       
47. Single   5   +31
48. Single   5   +26
49. Single   5   +21
50. Single   5   +16
51. Single   5   +11
52. Single   5   +6
53. Single   5   +1       
54. Single   6   +21    
55. Single  6   +15
56. Single   6   +9
57. Single   6   +3
58. Single  6       -2 211      

- - - - - - - - - -

59. Single   7   +27
60. Single   7   +20
61. Single   7   +13
62. Single   7   +6
63. Single   7   -1      
64. Single   8   +35
65. Single   8   +27
66. Single   8   +19
67. Single   8   +11
68. Single   8   +3   
69. Single   9   +35
70. Single    9   +26
71. Single   9   +17
72. Single   9   +8
73. Single   9   -1      
74. Single   10   +35
75. Single   10   +25
76. Single   10   +15
77. Single   10   +10
78. Single   10   -5      
79. Single   11   +4      
80. Single   12   +28      
81. Single   12   +16      
82. Single   12   +4         
83. Single   13   +27

- - - - - - - - - -

Second Sample - Cycles

1. EC
2. EC

3. Dozen
4. Dozen
5. Dozen

6. Line
7. Line
8. Line
9. Line
10. Line
11. Line

12. Corner
13. Corner
14. Corner
15. Corner
16. Corner
17. Corner
18. Corner
19. Corner
20. Corner

21. Street
22. Street
23. Street
24. Street
25. Street
26. Street
27. Street
28. Street
29. Street
30. Street
31. Street
32. Street

33. Split
34. Split
35. Split
36. Split
37. Split
38. Split
39. Split
40. Split
41. Split
42. Split
43. Split
44. Split
45. Split
46. Split
47. Split
48. Split
49. Split
50. Split

51. Single
52. Single
53. Single
54. Single
55. Single
56. Single
57. Single
58. Single
59. Single
60. Single
61. Single
62. Single
63. Single
64. Single
65. Single
66. Single
67. Single
68. Single
69. Single
70. Single
71. Single
72. Single
73. Single
74. Single
75. Single
76. Single
77. Single
78. Single
79. Single
80. Single
81. Single
82. Single
83. Single
84. Single
85. Single
86. Single
87. Single

Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ego


I want to join a private club or create one talking about Parachute Methods.

Cheers
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

6th-sense


Badger

I would like to join as well. :thumbsup:
The biggest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance ; it is the illusion of knowledge.
Daniel J Boorstin.

TurboGenius

link:[url="s://s18.postimg.cc/rgantqrs9/image.jpg"]s://s18.postimg.cc/rgantqrs9/image.jpg[/url]
link:[url="s://s15.postimg.cc/5lgm9j86j/turbo-banner.gif"]s://s15.postimg.cc/5lgm9j86j/turbo-banner.gif[/url]

-