Repeaters A LA Nimo REVEALED

[Nimo]

Just for $hits and giggles, here is a chart with playing the system using the 1111,2222,3333,4444,5555666 progression.  to the right on a loss, if a hit but not a new high, stay at that number until the 4 spins, reset on new high, using $10 units and just kept going.  Largest drawdown  $2720.  End balance $10140 at spin 291.  Highest progression level was 5. 

[ozon]

Maybe, actually it will be a better option to use the hot sector selection.

I did a similar test, but as hot sectors I used the table, I played according to your concept ,, I chose double streets, it is easier to follow them and the costs are several times smaller.
I used to play so flat bet. But now I've tried progression calculated at 30 steps and costing 770 units.
  I moved the assumptions of your strategy and played, always the hottest double street and I finished when it was 20

Unfortunately, in 7 session, progression did not last and lost 30 steps, it entered 32 step

Until then, I did something about 250 units, and I lost 770

[Nimo]

Maybe, actually it will be a better option to use the hot sector selection.

I did a similar test, but as hot sectors I used the table, I played according to your concept ,, I chose double streets, it is easier to follow them and the costs are several times smaller.
I used to play so flat bet. But now I've tried progression calculated at 30 steps and costing 770 units.
  I moved the assumptions of your strategy and played, always the hottest double street and I finished when it was 20

Unfortunately, in 7 session, progression did not last and lost 30 steps, it entered 32 step

Until then, I did something about 250 units, and I lost 770

I think the bet selection is what makes this work, the numbers seem to go together well, where in a double street or street, I think its more random.

[Thanatos]

...

Conversely, if you don't want to track, just play the last section hit with progression, you will get steeper drawdowns, but they recover quickly.  This way of play I have on roulette simulator under Nickmo.

...

If continually always playing the last section hit i guess it would make sense to only bet the last 7 unhit numbers. So progression should also be a bit cheaper. Aka if last spin was number 10 then next spin is very unlikely to repeat with 10 again. However the 7 other (unhit) numbers in this group/sections makes total logic sense to bet on. Just a quick idea if anyone considers this version.

[Nimo]

Wasn't sure I wanted to post this, but I want to help, or maybe see if this can be improved in anyway.

To all the math guys, yes I know the odds, yes I know progressions don't work in the long run, yes, blah blah blah.  Each time I double my bankroll, I consider it a victory.  Each time my bankroll grows past the top step in my progression it is another victory.  Having said that the bet selection tends to go into my favour time and time again.  So math guys please don't tell me I won't make any money or I will lose it all in the long run.  I withdrew a sizable chunk of change this week playing this, so until that stops I will keep withdrawing.

You can use a modified labby of 1111,2222,3333,4444, etc plus one on a loss, drop a section of numbers on a win until new high.  It's safest progression but takes forever.

Here is the progression that I use, it's for 8 numbers.  You need a larger bankroll if you are playing $1 bets, but you can start with 1 cent tables if your casino has them and move up as bankroll grows. 

1,1,1,1,2,2,3,4,5,6,8,10,13,17,22,28,36,46,59,76,98,126,162,208.  That is 24 steps.  (7480 units)  I actually have the progresssion up to 29 steps as my betting limit at my casino  will cater that.  However in testing with real money with help from Eddy,  progression has hit step 21. 

It's pretty basic system based on an older post I had on here about partners.  The way I had the system before was to wait for the partner to show up, now I just bet on the repeating sections.  Thank you to Turbo for the repeat angle of looking at things. 

The 6 numbers (6,15,24,33) usually show up with the 9 numbers (9,18,27,36)
The 4 numbers (4,13,22,31) usually show up with the 7 numbers (7,16,25,34)
The 3 numbers (3, 12, 21, 30) usually show up with the 8 numbers (8, 17,26,35)
The 2 numbers (2,11, 20,29) usually show up with the 5 numbers (5,14,23,32)
The 1 numbers (1, 10, 19, 28) Usually show up with the zero numbers (0, 11, 20 30)

I write down the sections, 1-2-3-4-6, as the numbers in their sections show up, I place a tick beside the number section, once a section is in the lead I bet on that section with progression.  If it stays in the lead, I keep betting on it, if another section takes over the lead, then I bet on that section, If the sections are equal I don't bet until a section goes into the lead again.  ( again thanks to Turbo for the racehorse analogy) The progression I have set up sets up for a profit at each level so once I get a hit, I will profit and start at beginning of progression.  I track the sections until the first section to have 25 hits is done and the game is over.  The odds of getting 8 random numbers to hit in 100 spins is 21 times, the hottest section usually hits around 25 times within a 100 spins, giving me charts like these.

Conversely, if you don't want to track, just play the last section hit with progression, you will get steeper drawdowns, but they recover quickly.  This way of play I have on roulette simulator under Nickmo.

Thanks to Eddy for helping me test it.

Still working great flat betting, with the only difference is if sections are equal, I play them both until one pulls ahead.

[Bigbroben]

I like the nr selection.  Been trying with surprisingly good hitrate.  I would bet on last 3 sets except the hit nr, so 3x 3nrs.  Keep the groups until 3 losses then change to the last 3 sets.

I'm trying to switch from sets of 4 nrs to sets of 3 ( one per dozen) when the swing seems to slow.

Had not noticed the set match, will pay attention and see if consistent.

Thnx

[Bigbroben]

So here,

a frequent sight when testing this one, alike to above mentioned:

Play all 3 other nrs in the group.  Add them as they come.  On a hit, switch the ''floating'' unit to the free spot in the same group.
Reset at new high.
Easy.  Wins more often than not, so far...

[777]

Nimo,

what do you recommend flat betting or progression?

[Nimo]

I play it all different ways, here is another way

Play the system with a 5 step progression, staying on the hottest section, if two or more sections equalize stay on the original section until a new front runner then switch.  Progression I used for this example is 4-5-7-9-11, once through the progression restart progression, but keep playing the hot section you were on. I kept playing until the 19th hit on the tracker and reset.



This example, maximum bet on the progression is $88, ($288 bankroll)  You can see where the progression hit and dropped, but it continued climbing. spins 31,50,59 and 74.  The spin 74 I went through progression twice, but it bounced back.  I think a 5x bankroll is good to start because once you get going it builds.  Less than 100 spins and $1000 profit. 

[Nimo]

ere is same system of following my hottest sections, but with positive progression of 1/5/25/100.  Keep flat betting on the section with 1 unit until you get a hit, Then keep flat betting 5 units on the hottest section until you get a hit, Then 25 units then 100 units.  If sections even out, stay on original section,

[Bigbroben]

Play all 3 other nrs in the group.  Add them as they come.  On a hit, switch the ''floating'' unit to the free spot in the same group.
Reset at new high.
Easy.  Wins more often than not, so far...

I keep being surprised by the hitrate of this.  It reaches 200u profit most of the time, within 100 spins.
Look at all the factors of 9 falling down close one to another.  Could R-Sim's rng be ''biased''?


Here's a regular sight:

[Nimo]

I keep being surprised by the hitrate of this.  It reaches 200u profit most of the time, within 100 spins.
Look at all the factors of 9 falling down close one to another.  Could R-Sim's rng be ''biased''?


Here's a regular sight:

Works on RX RNG as well as my casino RNG too.

[nottophammer]

Could R-Sim's rng be ''biased''?

Better let the general know 

[Mako]

Nice Ben, I continue to be surprised by how well each of the repeater or no-hit strategies we've been fooling around with lately actually work. 

Nimo and notto as well as others providing really great data.   

[Bigbroben]

?

I don't understand what you mean.