37 back to basics

[nottophammer]

Yes but how did you get that stat and the other stats? Not by testing over 100 spins. The point of testing over a lot of spins is to get as accurate averages as you can for the short term results. Obviously no one actually plays millions of spins.

Joe i'll show you soon

[gizmotron2]

Tell the world you're a broke scammer. But hey......lil Gizmo......prove me wrong on MPR ..... shut me up and show what you got. Action speak louder than words...... 

Nothing in life is permanent. I was almost a millionaire, Then I've already proven I can survive on poverty and still manage to figure out gambling. And I have been influential in the world regarding randomness. And what I have now, with a succinct set of playing rules, outclasses what I taught you on an order of magnitude.  All I'm going to do is disappear into my new status as a professional, tax paying, gambler. Let's all take notice that you have searched and have yet to succeed in your efforts. On a scale of things in my bucket list, you have thrown your life away, where I have filled mine to the brim. It would be fun to watch you try to learn, living far below the poverty level.  You have know knowledge of character. I know this because of what other people say about you. You are the poor man.

[ayk]

Have fun notto: link:://ayk.bplaced.net/notto/ 

[The General]

The numbers have no choice but to repeat.  Notto's countless posts on the where the repeats happen.  Along with 6th-sense back to basics you can also see where on the layout they will happen. 

Maybe you can't visualize it.  Picture it this way.  You take 100 balls and place them in a bin, at the bottom of the bin there is chute in which there are 37 holes.  Release the balls and the balls wont fall equally at a rate of 2.7 balls per hole.  Some will have none, some will have 4 or more.  It doesn't matter how many times you refill the bin with the 100 balls, the distribution will never be equal.  Not even a million times over. 

Of course some of the numbers will repeat and some won't hit at all.  That's variance and basic probability.  That's what is predicted.  Unfortunately you have no idea as to which number will continue hitting and which ones won't after such an observation. 
Of course you can merely bet using hit frequency distribution betting, but when you do so you'll find that over time, there's just one or two too many pockets on the wheel for it to win.   I can handily prove this for you guys on my simulators using real wheel data if someone would like to see proof that it's not going to work.

  In the meantime, you're wasting your time with your old and out dated ideas involving "the law of the third"/"Trot nonsense.  The reason many of you are stuck on these old recycled ideas is because of some old VB friends of mine.  They used the law of the third as a cover story for why they were winning back in 1982.  It hit several news outlets at the time, and people began trying to replicate their results.

[gizmotron2]

They used the law of the third as a cover story for why they were winning back in 1982.  It hit several news outlets at the time, and people began trying to replicate their results.

Great idea. I think I'll start using that one.

[-Katalyst-]

Caleb ....etc .... are you guys conclusively stipulating that youll cannot see the fact that by creating certain parameters/defining your game/ ‘spincycle’ - the game changes ........?

........no disrespect meant here
- one would have thought with all that experience you’ll keep alluding us to - surely you’ll are still not of the opinion that the game is totally random ........?

-depending on how far you (n company) are on your Journey/s - will eventually see that nothing is random-

- nobodys obliged to share or disclose anything on here, some are quite generous hence one would think that a collaborative culture would be more efficient/optimal ........?

Well - on here it’s all semantics & conjecture anyway

-Best Wishes-

[The General]

Caleb ....etc .... are you guys conclusively stipulating that youll cannot see the fact that by creating certain parameters/defining your game/ ‘spincycle’ - the game changes ........?

I'm not sure what it is that you're trying to say.  Can you be more specific?

........no disrespect meant here
- one would have thought with all that experience you’ll keep alluding us to - surely you’ll are still not of the opinion that the game is totally random ........?

Actually I make a hell of a nice living exploiting biased/non random events by playing both vb and bias.

-depending on how far you (n company) are on your Journey/s - will eventually see that nothing is random-

Yes, I am aware.

[Nimo]

Of course some of the numbers will repeat and some won't hit at all.  That's variance and basic probability.  That's what is predicted.  Unfortunately you have no idea as to which number will continue hitting and which ones won't after such an observation. 
Of course you can merely bet using hit frequency distribution betting, but when you do so you'll find that over time, there's just one or two too many pockets on the wheel for it to win.   I can handily prove this for you guys on my simulators using real wheel data if someone would like to see proof that it's not going to work.

  In the meantime, you're wasting your time with your old and out dated ideas involving "the law of the third"/"Trot nonsense.  The reason many of you are stuck on these old recycled ideas is because of some old VB friends of mine.  They used the law of the third as a cover story for why they were winning back in 1982.  It hit several news outlets at the time, and people began trying to replicate their results.

Here is a little spin sample for you.  It has nothing to do with LOTT, it is a repeater system.  This is a sample.  I test with real money. Real money results RNG are within same range.  Every single result with this I hit +2000 units between 400 and 500 spins.  Like clockwork.  There are drawdowns, I expect them, I account for them.  I don't need to know which number will hit next, my bets are reactionary to last spin.  Win percentage is in 10-15% range, house edge is -.27%, so a 12-17% edge in my favour.  There is progression, it's accounted for.  Don't tell me it won't work, when it's already made a  very healthy addition to my bank account.




Caleb, don't assume things that you don't know.  Not everyone here bets blindly, some of us keep meticulous records on everything, I ledger everything, I keep records on every bet I have ever placed.  By doing this i can see what has worked, what hasn't worked, what I can improve on.  I go over every session, once I'm done playing.  I have learned a lot by reading and trying and compiling.  Yes I'm still a newbie, but I believe that you are stuck in your old ways. 

[The General]

Here is a little spin sample for you.  It has nothing to do with LOTT, it is a repeater system.  This is a sample.  I test with real money. Real money results RNG are within same range.  Every single result with this I hit +2000 units between 400 and 500 spins.  Like clockwork.  There are drawdowns, I expect them, I account for them.  I don't need to know which number will hit next, my bets are reactionary to last spin.  Win percentage is in 10-15% range, house edge is -.27%, so a 12-17% edge in my favour.  There is progression, it's accounted for.  Don't tell me it won't work, when it's already made a  very healthy addition to my bank account.




Caleb, don't assume things that you don't know.  Not everyone here bets blindly, some of us keep meticulous records on everything, I ledger everything, I keep records on every bet I have ever placed.  By doing this i can see what has worked, what hasn't worked, what I can improve on.  I go over every session, once I'm done playing.  I have learned a lot by reading and trying and compiling.  Yes I'm still a newbie, but I believe that you are stuck in your old ways.

Sorry, but it won't work.  The reason you feel it works is because you're looking at small short term samples.

[Nimo]

But it is working, it works quite well, Italian Sports car well so far, and I'm not talking a Fiat.

[The General]

So far you've been lucky, that's all.  450 spins is very insignificant. 

[Nimo]

So far you've been lucky, that's all.  450 spins is very insignificant. 

400-500 spins over 225 times so far. (over 100000 spins) every single time it works out the same +2000 units . I like the old quote, "the harder I work the luckier I get."

It would be more but like I said, I go over every session with a fine tooth comb so it's time consuming, but well worth it.

[The General]

Sorry, but based on your description of how you play, there's no way that you're winning over an extended period of time.   

Perhaps you're playing in FREE MODE like Turbo was.  Free mode fooled Turbo too.

[-Katalyst-]

Caleb -  remembering - all science is best guess - moving over time  - soft n hard sciences evolve - what was true yesterday doesn’t necessarily mean it’s true tdy
- what I’m alluding to is that you are quite preassumptious in assuming that there are only one or two (AP/VB) ways to be successful at this

- regarding logical explanations as to ‘why’ etc - if life was to follow mans so called ‘logic’ than majority of things happening in/on this planet would cease  - sure that’s a debate for another title

- well done with your success

[The General]

Caleb -  remembering - all science is best guess - moving over time  - soft n hard sciences evolve - what was true yesterday doesn’t necessarily mean it’s true tdy
- what I’m alluding to is that you are quite preassumptious in assuming that there are only one or two (AP/VB) ways to be successful at this

I'm not being presumptuous.  My comments are based on the FACTS and vast experience.  There's only two ways to win in the long run.  Both involve exploiting the wheel, not the game.     

1. Bias
2. Ballistics