• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Test the accuracy of your method to predict the winning number. If it works, then your system works. But tests over a few hundred spins tell you nothing.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Turbo's System, Logic, Common Sense, and a Square

Started by The General, Jun 21, 02:48 PM 2018

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Steve

Quote from: TurboGenius on Jun 25, 07:13 AM 2018The spins that you win on aren't past spins, so no need to travel back to them.

The problem is "hot numbers" are the past. That's what you're betting on. And once they are hot, or cold, the odds of them winning again anytime soon have not changed. You'll be right about some, and wrong about some. But your accuracy is still no better than random.

You are suggesting that you play a session and your bets are made as the cycle unfolds. That's still betting on past spins.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

TurboGenius

Quote from: Steve on Jun 25, 07:47 PM 2018But your accuracy is still no better than random.

Yes it actually is better than random.
Never betting on a number that never shows means I never lost a unit on it, and I can never lose to the house edge.
Lets say "randomly" I sit down and say "I'm playing #20"
300 spins later it shows up and I'm in the hole now.
Another player sat down with me and he says "I'm not playing #20 until it shows".
299 spins later, he's lost nothing.
I'm using the word "potential" a lot in my book - because it's probably one
of the most important things to learn.
Any number that hasn't appeared is potentially a long term sleeper.
Why would anyone bet on it ?
The opposite is true as well, and that's where the profit comes from.

Quote from: Steve on Jun 25, 07:47 PM 2018You'll be right about some, and wrong about some

Exactly right !!
The ones I am right about - and there will always be a few, will outweigh the
ones I am wrong about. That's why a progression works where in most cases it
doesn't.
link:[url="s://s18.postimg.cc/rgantqrs9/image.jpg"]s://s18.postimg.cc/rgantqrs9/image.jpg[/url]
link:[url="s://s15.postimg.cc/5lgm9j86j/turbo-banner.gif"]s://s15.postimg.cc/5lgm9j86j/turbo-banner.gif[/url]

Steve

Quote from: TurboGenius on Jun 25, 09:46 PM 2018Never betting on a number that never shows means I never lost a unit on it, and I can never lose to the house edge.

True that if you dont bet, you can't lose. But thing is you make bets on other numbers, with random accuracy.

You are getting back into the nonsense about 24 numbers in 37 spins. You dont know those 24 numbers before they spin. Your logic is 2 is after 1, 3 is after 2, etc. Your other logic is you bet on hot numbers before they are hot. But you are still relying on past spins to give clues.

Again you are just going to give vague and inaccurate nonsense. And to prove your claims you use places like parx where lots of people regularly do better than you.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

Steve

Quote from: TurboGenius on Jun 25, 09:46 PM 2018Any number that hasn't appeared is potentially a long term sleeper.

And you're forgetting any number that HAS hit, even 3 times consecutively, is a potential long-term sleeper.

Quote from: TurboGenius on Jun 25, 09:46 PM 2018Any number that hasn't appeared is potentially a long term sleeper. Why would anyone bet on it ?

It's no different to a hot number. You are saying it makes no sense to bet on cold numbers. Its the same case for cold numbers and hot numbers.... which is neither is more likely to spin again anytime soon.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

falkor2k15

Quote from: Steve on Jun 25, 09:59 PM 2018
And you're forgetting any number that HAS hit, even 3 times consecutively, is a potential long-term sleeper.

It's no different to a hot number. You are saying it makes no sense to bet on cold numbers. Its the same case for cold numbers and hot numbers.... which is neither is more likely to spin again anytime soon.
SPOT ON! 2nd Dozen repeat below: all overtaken by a sleeper..

1 1   3 3 3
1 1   3 3 3
1 1   3 3 3
3 1 1   2 2 2
2 1 1   2 3 3 3
1 1   2 2 2
1 1   3 3 3
1 1   3 3 3
1 1   2 2 3 3 3
1 1   3 3 2 2 2
1 1   3 3 2 3
1 1   3 3 2 2 3
1 1   3 3 3
1 1   3 2 3 3
1 1   2 3 2 3 3
3 1 1   2 2 2
1 1   2 2 2
3 1 1   2 2 2
1 2 1   3 3 3
1 1   3 3 2 3
1 1   2 2 2
1 1   3 3 3
1 1   2 3 3 3
1 1   2 3 2 2
1 1   2 2 2
1 1   3 3 3
1 1   3 2 2 3 3
1 1   3 3 3
3 1 1   2 2 2
1 2 1   3 2 3 3
1 1   2 2 3 2
1 1   2 2 3 3 3
1 1   3 3 2 2 2
1 1   2 2 2
1 1   3 3 3
2 1 1   3 3 3
1 1   3 3 3
1 1   3 2 2 3 3
"Trotity trot, trotity trot, the noughts became overtly hot! Merily, merily, merily, merily, the 2s went gently down the stream..."¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪:

-