• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Pattern Test

Started by Ross, Jun 22, 09:15 PM 2018

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Ross

Not a fan of patterns but tested an idea
about the first bet of the "Parachute Method"
which is a bet on High or Low if it's hit twice
in the last two spins.

Added some other patterns for comparison.



Click on any of the "Test" buttons.
Can you draw any conclusions from the results?
(The number under "NM" is the number of losing bets.)
Eighty- four and counting.  Is age an excuse?

DoctorSudoku

Quote from: Ross on Jun 22, 09:15 PM 2018
Not a fan of patterns but tested an idea
about the first bet of the "Parachute Method"

which is a bet on High or Low if it's hit twice
in the last two spins.


Added some other patterns for comparison.



Thanks for this upload.

Are you familiar with bleep24's NLE and NLE mk2 methods?

They are somewhat similar to the bet selection method that you used here.

You can do a search for those two methods (both were posted in this forum) in case you are interested.
What is the fastest way of destroying your bankroll at the casino?

Play roulette with GLC's progressions.

Ross

Seems NLE1 and 2 are a similar bets to
the one I tested above.  Results wouldn't
vary much waiting for three ECs rather than 2
but there would be fewer bets.

Why look further when you have a bet with
a 90%+ hit rate?

Eighty- four and counting.  Is age an excuse?

-