Precognition - PROOF! results from MPR - the real holy grail

[Taotie]

Aw, come on now you're just being a troll.

[Steve]

Right.
Choose a weaker strain.

[precogmiles]

Furthermore supproting evidence that the universe could be a very advanced computer simulation is the infamous double slit experiment.

When scientists shoot a beam into two slits, it forms a wave interference pattern. When they shot a single photon at a time thinking it will show just two slits with no interference, but no, the single photon somehow still formed a wave interference pattern. That single photon was able to split itself to form the wave pattern when it couldn't be possible. Now this is when things get super weird, when the scientists tried to observe which photon was shot into which slit, the photon suddenly knew that it was being observed and the interference pattern doesn't show up.

It is very weird indeed that an observer can influence the state of reality. It brings to mind how a computer game generates its environment in open world games. Only when the player comes into a particular area does the trees, the cars and buildings are generated, but when the player leaves those cease to exist. But to the player playing it seems like a seamless enviroment.

I agree
It a humble robin can use quantum mechanics then who is to sayimg something related isn't happening with our physiology.

[Galabatov]

Found this channel on youtube, looks like an italian guy using precognition.
Awful video quality, but the session is interesting

link:s://:.youtube.com/watch?v=dYoXg_z4wDc&t=152s

[Clf7]

Found this channel on youtube, looks like an italian guy using precognition.
Awful video quality, but the session is interesting

link:s://:.youtube.com/watch?v=dYoXg_z4wDc&t=152s

A video is not any proof at all.....you can gamble just with random bets and upload only the winning session.

[precogmiles]

Found this channel on youtube, looks like an italian guy using precognition.
Awful video quality, but the session is interesting

link:s://:.youtube.com/watch?v=dYoXg_z4wDc&t=152s

It's good to see more people attempting precognition.

[precogmiles]

A video is not any proof at all.....you can gamble just with random bets and upload only the winning session.

Precognition has already been proved. Have you done any research?

[Clf7]

Precognition has already been proved. Have you done any research?

Sometimes you are not better than the system Players precog,you believe to much in something and dont read properly, just to tell every time  how good and perfect precognition is..... did i say that precognition is not real!? I made clear that a video is not proof for any system/method/anything else that it is beating the wheel.

[precogmiles]

Sometimes you are not better than the system Players precog,you believe to much in something and dont read properly, just to tell every time  how good and perfect precognition is..... did i say that precognition is not real!? I made clear that a video is not proof for any system/method/anything else that it is beating the wheel.

lol but galabatov did not say the video was proof for precognition.

[Clf7]

attempting precognition.

Nobody knows if it is random bets or precognition

[precogmiles]

Nobody knows if it is random bets or precognition

The video is called 'win real money with precognition'

I am assuming they are using precognition.

What about this video?

[pepper]

win real money with precognition

Precognition has never been proved, at least not publicly. There is highly conflicting evidence of whether or not people can influence rng. You probably just make more money for casinos by deluding people into believing they can influence/predict randomness, that is if people are stupid enough to bet without first proving beyond a statistical advantage that they have an edge.

You call people materialistic zombies while you are probably no better than that yourself. You're using a computer and internet connection after all, what exactly doesn't make you materialistic?

It seems kind of suspicious how you promote precog, but idk, maybe it does work? After all, it's not like you claim it to be easy. It's also weird that you promote physics to beat roulette, but whatever.

[precogmiles]

Precognition has never been proved, at least not publicly. There is highly conflicting evidence of whether or not people can influence rng. You probably just make more money for casinos by deluding people into believing they can influence/predict randomness, that is if people are stupid enough to bet without first proving beyond a statistical advantage that they have an edge.

You call people materialistic zombies while you are probably no better than that yourself. You're using a computer and internet connection after all, what exactly doesn't make you materialistic?

It seems kind of suspicious how you promote precog, but idk, maybe it does work? After all, it's not like you claim it to be easy. It's also weird that you promote physics to beat roulette, but whatever.

You do know that video is not mine, right?

If you believe precognition has not been proven then good for you.

Materialism in the philosophical sense.

I do not promote anything, I simply write about my experiences.

You have people on this and other forums selling systems that claim to win most sessions. Do you understand what that means? That means they are predicting the future of random events. First speak to them then come back and write your bs about precognition.

[pepper]

First of all, were probably like half way on the same page.

If you believe precognition has not been proven then good for you.

It"s probably real. I know telekinesis is real, yet the worldwide view is mostly at a consensus that it hasn"t been proven. Telekinesis is not only real, but very easy to learn and do. Perhaps it was only easy for me, because I had the correct knowledge or maybe my connection to the supernatural realm, idk.
I am curious as to what the explanation of this is (the rejection by experts at large who are oblivious of spirits and psychic abilities). Maybe people, like the elite, are hiding genuine psychic knowledge and even promoting knowledge they claim to be psychic. I don"t even know if the elite exists and if so, to what extent, and would there be counter elitists (other powerful groups of people that fight them).

You have people on this and other forums selling systems that claim to win most sessions.

These are probably all scammers.

First speak to them

No, this would be a waste of time and energy

write your bs about precognition

Huh? I thought we were on the same page here. I do believe it may be possible to gain an edge using precognition, but one would have to be exceptionally trained to do so. Most people may not even gain enough power to put a dent in the house edge. If you disagree with my term "power", you may put your own term in there; perhaps, it could be "predictive ability".

[Galabatov]

Pepper,

telekinesis, precognition, clairevoyance, psychometry... it's the same force, the same power acting. Application is different.

I know precognition is real, application to roulette is real and profitable, what I still don't understand, after several months of continous play, is how make it work consinstently at peak performance.
My training in meditation is sound, my relaxation skill is good, my "inner" sight is fine. But still can't say I master precognition, although I am very close.

For example, this morning after good meditation and relaxation an awful session followed. This afternoon, after a couple of beers, a glass of wine, bothered by the heat of the summer, I make a session with the smartphone on the couch and gained 120 units in few minutes with outstanding performance, playing minisectors of 3 numbers.

Precognition is real, is here for those who are devoted to it. Although I still can't master it each and every session, evidences are so clear that I would be an asshole sucker if I ignore them. And don't talk about luck, random, and the like. I've been playing roulette for the last fifteen years and I know what I'm saying.