Precognition - PROOF! results from MPR - the real holy grail

[luckyfella]

Let's not do it again.

Ofc we should move on. Long time ago.

[precogmiles]

The ignorance in this thread reminds me of why I stopped posting on the forum. Firefox and buffalo can believe what they want, I don’t care to be honest. In fact, please don’t ever believe precog is possible. Good luck with your systems.

I will continue to win and get better.

And why are people hijacking threads to attack Steve?

[luckyfella]

I will continue to win and get better.

Have you not learnt ?

Make your millions. It's that simple.

[Firefox]

@precogmiles, why are you taking several small duplicate accounts each up to a few hundred spins in profit and then claiming precognition?

Why not just take one account up to 25,000 spins or more with massive wins?

It's very easy to take an account up to a few hundred spins in profit either using natural luck in variance, or using a negative progression. Such that you reap short term profit before the huge draw down on your bank roll via the negative progression occurs, which we all know will happen. And its very easy to take a dupe account up to 100 spins or so and then abandon/disown them if the natural variance is initially negative or if your big drawdown occurs early.

Honestly, you are fooling nobody by doing this.

[precogmiles]

@precogmiles, why are you taking several small duplicate accounts each up to a few hundred spins in profit and then claiming precognition?

Why not just take one account up to 25,000 spins or more with massive wins?

It's very easy to take an account up to a few hundred spins in profit either using natural luck in variance, or using a negative progression. Such that you reap short term profit before the huge draw down on your bank roll via the negative progression occurs, which we all know will happen. And its very easy to take a dupe account up to 100 spins or so and then abandon/disown them if the natural variance is initially negative or if your big drawdown occurs early.

Honestly, you are fooling nobody by doing this.

Let me make this clear... Your opinion is irrelevant. I already told you to please believe that precog is impossible and good luck with your systems.

10 SD? 25,000 spins? ....... are you serious? Do you honestly think I am going to waste my time doing 25,000 spins to prove myself to you or any other sceptic?

And again I don't care who believes me.... those who understand, UNDERSTAND!

[buffalowizard]

Let me make this clear... Your opinion is irrelevant. I already told you to please believe that precog is impossible and good luck with your systems.

10 SD? 25,000 spins? ....... are you serious? Do you honestly think I am going to waste my time doing 25,000 spins to prove myself to you or any other sceptic?

And again I don't care who believes me.... those who understand, UNDERSTAND!

If someone said they'd be convinced and pay 2 mill for 25,000 spins, then hell yes I would give it to 'em.
If not then it proves you either
A) cant be bothered because you know its only luck . or
B) are filthy rich from seeing the future and so dont need peoples money (which seems strange because you kept asking people to buy your secrets for millions of dollars)
Hmmm

[Mako]

Guys, if you don't like it when Steve and Caleb come into our fallacy threads and piss on our heads, how about you don't go into their precog threads and do likewise? 

It's very similar...some will never be convinced about precog being possible, just as some will never believe that (for lack of a better term) random has limits.

Firefox and BW, you're not wrong, just as those using math as a basis for deconstructing fallacy methods are not wrong.  But once you've said what you want to say, exit the thread, otherwise you risk just repeating yourself endlessly while the believers tune you out. 

[precogmiles]

If someone said they'd be convinced and pay 2 mill for 25,000 spins, then hell yes I would give it to 'em.
If not then it proves you either
A) cant be bothered because you know its only luck . or
B) are filthy rich from seeing the future and so dont need peoples money (which seems strange because you kept asking people to buy your secrets for millions of dollars)
Hmmm

Well that just shows not everyone is as easily manipulated as you.
1) your opinion does not matter
2) you are a liar!... I will never tell anyone my method as it has taken me a long time to develop but yet you claim I am asking others to buy it? are you sick in the brain? or do you just pull random nonsense out of your stinking ass?

[Mako]

Well that just shows not everyone is as easily manipulated as you.
1) your opinion does not matter
2) you are a liar!... I will never tell anyone my method as it has taken me a long time to develop but yet you claim I am asking others to buy it? are you sick in the brain? or do you just pull random nonsense out of your stinking ass?

Miles don't get so worked up, they're just having a go at you.  Keep doing your research and producing both good and bad results, all testing is good testing, I don't care where it comes from. 

[precogmiles]

Miles don't get so worked up, they're just having a go at you.  Keep doing your research and producing both good and bad results, all testing is good testing, I don't care where it comes from. 

Thanks Mako, they seem to be sceptical just for the sake of it.

[Firefox]

Guys, if you don't like it when Steve and Caleb come into our fallacy threads and piss on our heads, how about you don't go into their precog threads and do likewise? 

It's very similar...some will never be convinced about precog being possible, just as some will never believe that (for lack of a better term) random has limits.

Firefox and BW, you're not wrong, just as those using math as a basis for deconstructing fallacy methods are not wrong.  But once you've said what you want to say, exit the thread, otherwise you risk just repeating yourself endlessly while the believers tune you out. 

Actually I believe precognition, PK, and remote viewing will become possible. If one looks into into string theory, different time lines, and parallel universes and also examine human brain activity, there's a hell of a lot we don't know. I don't believe they are possible at the moment, as our technology and our brains are not sufficiently advanced. But they will be, if we don't kill ourselves off  with nuclear war or trash the planet in the meantime

And it's certainly clear that working a couple of sock accounts into profit after a few hundred spins is proof of any precognition existence.

As for people repeating themselves endlessly, that's what happens on forums. You know it! 

I'm certainly not rude or abusive, I just state a case.

[Mako]

Remote viewing has always fascinated me, particularly when the CIA and other military programs built around it were exposed decades after they were stopped, and the people leading them (mostly hardened officers who considered it "bullshit" before they were assigned to it) said it varied from "somewhat effective" to "highly effective".

I was shocked to hear that they had success, and in some cases incredible success.

Now, years later, we begin to learn about quantum entanglement, and are just taking our first baby steps into understanding that phenomenon, and you're right Firefox....eventually science may be able to validate some of the more "bullshit" mental endeavors that have been on the fringe for so long.

It's all very cool honestly. 

[Firefox]

There's somewhat contrasting opinions about the CIA psychic project Stargate though:

The Stargate Project was terminated and declassified in 1995 after a CIA report concluded that it was never useful in any intelligence operation. Information provided by the program was vague and included irrelevant and erroneous data, and there was reason to suspect that its project managers had changed the reports so they would fit background cues.

Source and more info: link:s://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stargate_Project

Not to say it didn't have any merit, but my personal opinion is that it was very much before its time, and there's some time to go before that time comes. String theory and quantum theory has very much moved on since 1995. The development of AI may be part of the process to unlocking some of these secrets.

[precogmiles]

Congrats Pre!

I hope you can briefly explain how you play.

Perhaps a fictional session description play by play as an example.

You do mention you have a template or a word to that degree

could you describe "it"

it cant be tested on RX, only through personal spin by spin decision "making"

so only the "lucky" winners would succeed with it anyway

looking forward to your reply

I've written a guide with various methods link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=25904.0

[precogmiles]

I'll just leave this here;

On a different public game, same results;



Just 2 days playing rated game I was just having some fun with progression + Precog.