Precognition - PROOF! results from MPR - the real holy grail

[precogmiles]

Maybe the title is a little over the top, but many of you are still in doubt about the reality of precognition. Well here is evidence!

In the previous MPR before the reset I managed to scored 1.14 winrate after 800 spins.

Currently, using the leaderboard (link:://:.rouletteplayers.org/leaderboard);
If you eliminate all players with less than 50 spins, and reorder by winrate you will see that I have two accounts both in the top 4 out of a total of 27 players.

(position 1st). pmiles - 1.23 winrate with 202 spins
(postion 4th). precogmiles - 1.13 winrate with 390 spins

If I got those results with just one account, you might claim I got lucky, that is why I made two accounts, one bet small the other betting large. And as you can see both have got higher than the expected winrate (0.97) and I've never reset by bank balance.



The more spins I do will not prove anything in regards to precognition, I could do a million spins and would still get above expected chance. It's up to you what you want to believe but I think the evidence is now conclusive! 

[Blueprint]

Not doubting your results here but I am curious why anyone in the world would play on that crap software. 

[nottophammer]

wonder who's 2nd

[precogmiles]

wonder who's 2nd

Could it be you?

[Steve]

I believe precog is real. But testing a statistically significant amount of spins is difficult because you cant use automatic testing software for high volume testing. I think we all have the ability and its just a matter of proper development.

[Taotie]

The more spins I do will not prove anything in regards to precognition, I could do a million spins and would still get above expected chance.

Oh really? C'mon then, forget about 1 million, lets see you do say 2000 spins with one of your accounts then we will compare your win rate.

And if you are content to declare yourself the winner after relatively so few spins, then why would you remove the results of those players with 50 spins or less?

Precog cherry picking I call it. Classic Texas Sharpshooter fallacy.

on a side note, of course 5000+ is notto. As if we didn't know, lol.

[Moxy]

I believe precog is real. But testing a statistically significant amount of spins is difficult because you cant use automatic testing software for high volume testing. I think we all have the ability and its just a matter of proper development.

I must've missed missed your post with your stipulation for me, Steve.  We should chat.

[Steve]

Moxy, the "outide the box" board is specifically for roads less traveled. It includes precog, which I believe is very real. Ive said many times I believe it has greater potential than even roulette computers.

See link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=18276.0 (I just havent had time for further testing).

Ive also been in contact with a group that develops precognition enhancers. They measure physiological changes from the subconscious mind to enhance precog. I suggested they assess cardio cycles too because from what I understand, your heart knows best.

[Moxy]

Moxy, the "outide the box" board is specifically for roads less traveled. It includes precog, which I believe is very real. Ive said many times I believe it has greater potential than even roulette computers.

See link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=18276.0 (I just havent had time for further testing).

Ive also been in contact with a group that develops precognition enhancers. They measure physiological changes from the subconscious mind to enhance precog. I suggested they assess cardio cycles too because from what I understand, your heart knows best.

Uh...  Woops, I just wanted to catch you with your latest post.  We had a different discussion a while back that I am interested in continuing.   

I also believe in precognition, esp, telekinesis.  All that fun stuff.  I wouldn't be surprised if PCM is the real deal.  But digressing, I want to give you my pitch either here or pm.   What other forum is more fitting for it.  Skirting the issue gets you (me) no where, I learned.   

[Steve]

Discuss it here, but maybe start a new thread depending on its relevance. There are plenty of forums for just about everything anyway, but I have had an interest in this for a long time.

[Moxy]

Discuss it here, but maybe start a new thread depending on its relevance. There are plenty of forums for just about everything anyway, but I have had an interest in this for a long time.

I have a 2 to 1 hit rate flat betting EC no skip which is by all accounts very high (.66666 pct).  I have another method that is even more accurate but more mental work. I have another that defies physics.  All these are outside the box, yet tangible. Most importantly, it's accessible to most.  It's my work that I would potentially be willing to part with for no less than a couple (us) million dollars.  I will be willing to discuss more (real world applications: forex, stocks, sports betting, etc) but now you know where I stand.   

[Steve]

I have another method that is even more accurate but more mental work.

Im all ears.

I have another that defies physics.

If something appears to defy physics, then your understanding of physics is wrong. Physics is just how things work, however that may be.

[Steve]

It's my work that I would potentially be willing to part with for no less than a couple (us) million dollars.

You can have my experience with this kind of thing at no cost. I'm not interested to profit from it.

I will be willing to discuss more (real world applications: forex, stocks, sports betting, etc) but now you know where I stand. 

The precog software is real world application. I just havent had time to properly do something with it.

[Moxy]

Im all ears.

If something appears to defy physics, then your understanding of physics is wrong. Physics is just how things work, however that may be.

I am interested in your response to my offer.  All this requires zero study of the any wheel and possibly stock market chart, forex chart, insider sport scoops, etc.  It's all contained in itself.  I can further describe the physics of it to you if you are interested.

[Moxy]

You can have my experience with this kind of thing at no cost. I'm not interested to profit from it.

The precog software is real world application. I just havent had time to properly do something with it.

This is the reason you started this forum to have something accessible and much, much easier to access than what you had hence your offer.   Why do you think I am here.   This is mechanical in every sense.  This is for laymen. What else is there to say.  What is hg then if not what I just described?  What is this forum for then?  It's contradiction.

Pre-cog software cannot be compared to what I have already.  This is it.  If you are scared to find out then please just tell me.

Seeing it for yourself, you will understand where I'm coming from.