Precognition - PROOF! results from MPR - the real holy grail

[Firefox]

I believe precognition,  TK, and PK will be achieved at some point in the future of human development. I don't believe we have got there at the present time. Do you have an example from MPR that may indicate otherwise ?!

[buffalowizard]

Steve, you're not tempted to tap into this guys powers yet?

[precogmiles]

Congrats Pre!

I hope you can briefly explain how you play.

Perhaps a fictional session description play by play as an example.

You do mention you have a template or a word to that degree

could you describe "it"

it cant be tested on RX, only through personal spin by spin decision "making"

so only the "lucky" winners would succeed with it anyway

looking forward to your reply

Thanks amk,

I am sorry I can't give you the method step by step. It took me a very long time to develop it and there is no guarantee it will work for you anyway.

But I can help you get started if you would like. Precognition is not a complex process, It's actually very simple. What is hard is the hours of practice needed in order to know when something feels right.

I would suggest you practice your skills using the following website link:s://psychicscience.org/esp3.aspx This will help you develop your abilities. Secondly you need to meditate and learn to calm and still your mind.

Some resources are;
Patanjalis yoga sutra,
esp induction through forms of self-hypnosis,
IONs institute,
'How did you know' by spin-geek aka kenny thompson
roulette warriors (on youtube) give some good advice
Many threads in this forum (i.e link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=15635.0)

In regard to the method I use. While I can not tell you the precognition part I do combine my precog with forms of progression.
I sometimes bet large playing dozens with progression. or I bet small on finales and use an aggressive negative progression. 

I would honestly advice you and everyone else not to play roulette until you have very strong precog abilities otherwise you are giving your money away to the casino.

Good luck!

[precogmiles]

I do believe in precog, but one of the problems with testing is it takes too long to get a statistically relevant sample to prove anything properly.

I agree. I guess it will just be one of those grey areas science really can't touch unless anyone is willing to sit down and conduct a million trials. But, there comes a point where you either believe or you don't.

[precogmiles]

I believe precognition,  TK, and PK will be achieved at some point in the future of human development. I don't believe we have got there at the present time. Do you have an example from MPR that may indicate otherwise ?!

Yes I can give you an example. Do you mean like someone on MPR that has a high winrate?

[Firefox]

Yes I can give you an example. Do you mean like someone on MPR that has a high winrate?

I'm just asking Steve the question. It was he who brought the subject of MPR up.

But if one could truly  look into the future , I'd expect something really off the scale. Not something  5 or 6 SD out on 5000 trials.

So, I'm waiting with baited breath to see what ocurrs! Bearing in mind of course that certain previous protagonists have gamed and cheated MPR in order to "demonstrate" their "talents"

[luckyfella]

update for the winrate leaderboard...

All players with a more than 200 spins and winrate of 1.0 or higher. Ranked by winrate



Do you see a pattern here?

Totals


Bankroll: 63722
Spins: 1854
A. Bet: 133417
A. Won: 167589
Winrate: 1.31438522

Everyone is entitled to their opinions but these are hardcore facts.

Go make your millions[with your own money].....Steve

Why hasn't he yet ?......Luckyfella

Best of luck you need it......Caleb

[Taotie]

I do believe in precog, but one of the problems with testing is it takes too long to get a statistically relevant sample to prove anything properly.

..and that goes double for precog/roulette. I don't know why "we" are posting/boasting results of precog/roulette with spin samples that amount to nothing more than a weekend roulette binge.

[Ricky]

Hi all
I have some real life experience in roulette that I cannot explain. Is this a very recurring coincidence in my life or is this evidence of precognition.
Sometimes I am sitting at the roulette table and reviewing all the bets I covered and for one reason or another I would think of a number I forgot to bet on. Say I am following a method/system that requires me to cover all repeats or all low red numbers  but I missed one or I’m focussing on the zero whic I did not cover. Then I watch the wheel as it is spinning and I get this real sense in my stomach  that the speed of the ball and the wheel are spinning at the right speed that coincides with my number I’m thinking of. And then bang my precognition turns true
Call it coincidence or not but it happens far too often for me to discard some sort of prophecy being played out even if only 2-5 seconds in the future

Having said that, Steve I think the tables are turned when you honestly believe you can build software that can provide you an advantage and yet you discard all merits of all the system builders that have come to this forum as promoting gamblers fallacy. I think you need to have an open mind to any approach being discussed. At the end of the day of coarse the math of a single spin of roulette is not in the gamblers favour. But put a system together whether flat betting or progression that plays to the limits of randomness rhenvthere has to be some merit compared to just guessing and throughing chips on the table hoping the ball will land on the one with the biggest pile

Cheers
Ricky

[Firefox]

People boasting intuiton at MPR appear to have spin samples of a few hundred. This is not statistically significant. It is also possible to create multiple accounts there, trumpet the ones that win, and forget about the ones that lose.

Come on guys, give us credit for a bit of knowledge about gambling statistics, this is not fooling anyone. Take an account up to 25,000 spins. Absolutely crush the game. Be 10 SDs positive. It should be simple if you can read the future!

[buffalowizard]

People boasting intuiton at MPR appear to have spin samples of a few hundred. This is not statistically significant. It is also possible to create multiple accounts there, trumpet the ones that win, and forget about the ones that lose.

Come on guys, give us credit for a bit of knowledge about gambling statistics, this is not fooling anyone. Take an account up to 25,000 spins. Absolutely crush the game. Be 10 SDs positive. It should be simple if you can read the future!

Precisely. But I'm sure when they are having an 'off' day, there'll be just as many excuses as any system player hanging onto the belief that theres is the 'one' . how do you prove that it's powers of the unknown and not plain lucky guesswork? He uses a progression anyway, which will inflate any short term samples chance of winning.

[Ricky]

Just leaving a foreign land with 250 euros of the casinos money. Played about 200-300 spins over 5 days. Had a struggle few days and fell behind but called it a night and win for house those days. But in the end I had a good streak of luck playing my system.

I’m sure I’ml be back to give it all back but it will be a while and in the meantime I get to invest it

Cheers
Ricky

[Steve]

I don't believe we have got there at the present time. Do you have an example from MPR that may indicate otherwise ?!

Mpr is a very small sample of earth. But i believe we all already have the latent ability, which surfaces every now and then. This is why the edge is usually only small. Probably there are people whi can do much better. But people with such consciousness are quite unlikely to care about roulette.

I have my beliefs from various sources, credible tests, and my own experiences.

Steve, you're not tempted to tap into this guys powers yet?

Thats no more possible than tapping into someone's awareness. Again i think we all have the ability. But how many here have honestly given it proper development and work?

Go make your millions[with your own money].....Steve
Why hasn't he yet ?......Luckyfella
Best of luck you need it......Caleb

Probably he has won a bit already. Does it prove it's legitimate? No. Like i said.

Ricky, the first part of what you said is common. Many players have such experiences. Are they or mind playing tricks, or something more? I believe both happens.

you discard all merits of all the system builders that have come to this forum as promoting gamblers fallacy. I think you need to have an open mind to any approach being discussed

Heres what you're not understanding:

I do have an open mind. Much more open than most people.

The approaches i call gamblers fallacy have been tested extensively already. The people promoting them just don't understand it.

I don't say things dont work because of a close mind. I do it because the math, logic and tests are crystal clear. If someone says 1+1=3, and you say it doesn't, it's that because you don't have an open mind?

Testing a system thats supposed to work on rng is super simple. Just code large tests. You can't do that with precog.

The fallacy players show us their proof, which are short term results that seem to support them. The longer tests reveal the truth. Their response is usually something boneheaded like you will never play that many spins anyway

The fallacy players have a very poor understanding of basic math and probability. They don't even understand simple concepts, even when they are spelled out repeatedly.

[luckyfella]

Testing a system thats supposed to work on rng is super simple. Just code large tests. You can't do that with precog.

You are correct. Especially the part about large sample test with rng or live spins.

You don't know that someone out there may possess the test results of large sample size(millions of spins) that show that their mechanical systems bet give a positive edge, right ? Keep an open mind

[Steve]

You don't know that someone out there may possess the test results of large sample size(millions of spins) that show that their mechanical systems bet give a positive edge, right ? Keep an open mind

Sure thats possible. But im referring to cases when someone says garbage like the law of a third can give you a 1 in 20 hit rate.

There are so many problems with that. But the most conclusive is extensive tests that show each trial is independent, and repeaters are just basic probability coming from 1 in 37. It has been explained extensively. Let's not do it again.

Again if someone says 1+1=3 and you disagree, is it because you don't have an open mind?