Precognition - PROOF! results from MPR - the real holy grail

[Steve]

Joe, i did publish results of a credible test, and the group tested specifically for roulette. I published only part of the document - the results. I also have my own tests and experience.

I understand statistics, as ive explaimed before it is impractical to get sufficient volume of tests. By then the subjects would be over it and probably lose accuracy.

I dont think precog is beyond the realm of possibility. Overall the data and experience i have suggests its real, but we are a long way from understanding what's going on.

[Steve]

the scientific community is pretty clear that it doesn't exist. You've given a hypothesis which explains precog (if it exists), but there are a lot of problems with it.

It was once unthinkable that radio waves existed. Both we and the sclentific community don't know much compared to all possible knowledge.

The simple fact is precog test results are mixed. Many tests are not done properly because precog is not understood. Do we hold up paper and conclude radio waves don't exist because the paper doesn't get burnt?

Do we test precog with ordinary people off the street? Do we jist plonk a crystal ball in front of them and expect miracles?

We just don't know about this. Its not well understood. I believe it's real but very poorly understood.

[nottophammer]

Now this just happened; the #10 came and i won. But i just said #10 and it came again.
No thinking of precog or thoughts along this line; just said #10.

So is it subconscious suddenly was there or what made that thought happen.

[Steve]

Even experienced players have similar experiences often enough to think its not coincidence. It's like thinking if someone you forgot about for years, then they call on the phone seconds later. What are the chances?

It's all interesting but i cant yet say either way if it's reality in roulette or not.

[Joe]

It's like thinking if someone you forgot about for years, then they call on the phone seconds later. What are the chances?

This would be more likely (IMO) to be a case of telepathy rather than precognition, assuming it's not just coincidence of course. There have been studies done on this and the results do suggest that there is something going on other than mere coincidence.

link:s://:.sheldrake.org/research/telepathy/experimental-tests-for-telephone-telepathy

It's a good example of how experiments should be set up to test this kind of thing.

[Steve]

This would be more likely (IMO) to be a case of telepathy rather than precognition

Yes it may be. That's what I meant by saying we don't really know what's going on.

[precogmiles]

Just leaving this here;

[jono1167]

Just leaving this here;
S

Respect 👌 👍
Well done Precog.

[Still]

Very good, thanks for the evidence.  I think this will finally convince the cognitive dissonant among us. 

So i see two versions of play.  In the number three spot is where you are betting on a minority sector, and in the number one spot you are betting on a majority sector.  May i ask what sector you are betting on?

In either case it looks like a 20% drawdown is to be expected, enroute to 10x gains over...about how much time was invested in these two days play?

[precogmiles]

about how much time was invest

Thanks still.

It was a long time ago but from what I remember, the positions were no specific, I played what I sensed.

Since then I have mostly focused on hitting single numbers.

[precogmiles]

Here are some research papers and reports for any precog players who need a little more assurance this is real. I know it can sometimes be a lonely road but this is true, just stay focused and keep practising.

Electrophysiology of Intuition: Pre-stimulus Responses in Group and Individual Participants Using a Roulette Paradigm

link:s://:.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4010965/

Overall, the results indicate that the revised protocol provides an effective objective measure for detecting a pre-stimulus response, which reflects a type of nonlocal intuition.


We Did See This Coming

link:s://library.noetic.org/library/publication-scholarly-papers/we-did-see-coming
link:s://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1501/1501.03179.pdf


Backward Causation
link:s://plato.stanford.edu/entries/causation-backwards/

Feeling the future: A meta-analysis of 90 experiments on the anomalous anticipation of random future events
link:s://:.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4706048/

Precognition as a Form of Prospection: A Review of the Evidence
link:://:.deanradin.com/articles/2018%20Precognition%20as%20a%20Form%20of%20Prospection%20cns_5_1_78.pdf

[holy roller]

I hate to sound stupid but I am fairly new to roulette... but what is MPR? Does this forum have a dictionary of terms somewhere? Thanks.

[Still]

I hate to sound stupid but I am fairly new to roulette... but what is MPR? Does this forum have a dictionary of terms somewhere? Thanks.

It's a local roulette simulator put up by the owner of this forum so people can test their skills, or, more importantly, prove something.  Stands for Multiplayer Roulette Game because the one game handles multiple people, just as a single live wheel can accomodate multiple players.  A number drops every 30 seconds. But if you are the only player playing at the time, you can speed that up. 

It will then keep score and post a few statistics on a leader board. 

precogmiles has proved precognition works on the local "MPR" game but Joe doesn't consider it to be evidence which illustrates the always interesting relationship between people with biases and what's called evidence.  Last i checked precogmiles was at the top of the leaderboard but i don't think Joe believes it.

[winforus]

Great to have you posting again precogmiles. I am interested in hearing about your progress on this journey so far.

How are your results like now with betting on single numbers? Do you still train on MPR or do real money betting as well?

[holy roller]

Thanks Still.

Is there a link for the MPR on here? I would like to try it out. Maybe even give precog a run for his "money:.