Precognition - PROOF! results from MPR - the real holy grail

[Joe]

Then why don't you share this amazing discovery and that will end the discussion.

I couldn't even if I wanted to because it's not a system which can be described easily. In fact it's a large computer program with thousands of lines of code. I've mentioned it before in another thread.  It was written by my cousin's husband who was a professional programmer but now makes a good living (and has done so for years) from playing roulette online. It uses pretty ordinary systems based on statistics (no dangerous progressions), but they are integrated in an ingenious way. It's not a 'bot' but is totally mechanical; he just enters the spins and it tells him where to bet.

It's fine if you don't believe me, I didn't at first. 

[precogmiles]

I couldn't even if I wanted to because it's not a system which can be described easily. In fact it's a large computer program with thousands of lines of code. I've mentioned it before in another thread.  It was written by my cousin's husband who was a professional programmer but now makes a good living (and has done so for years) from playing roulette online. It uses pretty ordinary systems based on statistics (no dangerous progressions), but they are integrated in an ingenious way. It's not a 'bot' but is totally mechanical; he just enters the spins and it tells him where to bet.

It's fine if you don't believe me, I didn't at first.

Maybe you should come to some agreement with him to buy his program.

Or maybe he should watch Steve's videos. I think Steve also went through a phase of winning using a system.

[Moxy]

Roulette and passive income should not even be in the same sentence.

It is funny that some people think casinos are stupid.

Casinos hire real PhD statistians and expert quantitative analysts to help with there KPI and Profit and losses.

System players are delusional as hell if they think casinos will allow any game that can be beaten by mathematics in their casinos either online or B&M

Casinos will even cheat if they have to. This is a business not a charity.

Whatever you say, chief.  You're the expert. 

[Moxy]

Then why don't you share this amazing discovery and that will end the discussion.

Bunch of clever hacks on here.   No dice. 

[pepper]

There is no opportunity to apply creativity or logic to precognition; it's mindless.

Precog has tons of creativity involved, depending on what you're doing. Precog could include meditations on your 3rd eye and pineal gland to improve creativity. I have won using precog by changing my methods and style of play. My experience indicates that you can't keep doing the same thing. My methods are creativity at its finest: constantly coming up with new ways to visualize and direct energy. Also, I wouldn't even care about creativity with roulette, just making money, but creativity is fun and useful for other parts of your life.

[pepper]

If you properly meditate on all your chakras and engage in energy work, like I have, you will realize that our thinking is unlimited. We can take advantage of this by constantly changing our method of precog, since the same thing doesn't always work.

Perhaps people have mastered their own precog techniques and can always use the same thing. Kudos to them!

[pepper]

playing roulette online

All online table games cheat. Period.
Perhaps they will allow or even rig their software or games to let you win with free money, but not with real money.

Once you have a real winning method, you must go to a real bricks and mortar casino in real person.

Also, do you really think an online casino is going to let someone win over and over?

[Joe]

Maybe you should come to some agreement with him to buy his program.

He'll never sell it and won't give it away either because he put so much effort into creating it. But he has given me advice on how to write my own. I just haven't got around to doing it yet. I guess if my need was greater I'd be more motivated.

Or maybe he should watch Steve's videos. I think Steve also went through a phase of winning using a system.

lol, I'm not about to take Steve's advice on systems. And it's not a 'phase'. Like I said, he's been winning for years, and tested it extensively before playing for real money. It's bulletproof.

[Joe]

All online table games cheat. Period.

Right. Thanks for your opinion. 

[winforus]

I couldn't even if I wanted to because it's not a system which can be described easily. In fact it's a large computer program with thousands of lines of code. I've mentioned it before in another thread.  It was written by my cousin's husband who was a professional programmer but now makes a good living (and has done so for years) from playing roulette online. It uses pretty ordinary systems based on statistics (no dangerous progressions), but they are integrated in an ingenious way. It's not a 'bot' but is totally mechanical; he just enters the spins and it tells him where to bet.

It's fine if you don't believe me, I didn't at first.

Does his program beat a particular wheel or wheels, or all wheels online? And does it beat RNG roulette or real wheels with live cameras?

If it is based on statistics, and can beat roulette wheels without using progression (flat betting) - then it's not really a "system". It would be an AP program - which uses bias analysis, or other metrics, which increases the accuracy of predictions.

You need to understand, that when I refer to systems here, I am referring to methods that do not improve the accuracy of predictions.

[Moxy]

Right. Thanks for your opinion. 

He's/She's got a point.   Most every online casino (real live tables mainly) will ban you at some point in time in an effort to not allow you to use them as a source of income if you take them hard and often.

So he would have to essentially win little here and there and lose even less here and there as to not trigger any alarm bells to thrive for years.  And maybe do that stealthily with multiple online casino accounts for a more substantial take. 

Years ago, I won 6k from 1k in one night.  The very next day, hastily as I was, thinking that I was on the fast track to you know what, the RNG almost seemed to dynamically "play" against me regardless what I did.

At the time I didn't know any legit AP play so it was very likely the casino odds finally catching up to me.  But, I am certain to this day the consecutive amount of losses it gave me went past the statistical norm of common variance because I most likely triggered their alarm bell on the huge win the night prior, which I also may have won past the statistical norm of common variance. 

In other words, the RNG was rigged to let you win first, only to take all of your money in the end and hope you didn't learn your lesson the first time around.  I sure did though. I got it back up to 5k and withdrew.  Never played again.

But if your in law is thriving then good for him.

[Joe]

Does his program beat a particular wheel or wheels, or all wheels online? And does it beat RNG roulette or real wheels with live cameras?

If it is based on statistics, and can beat roulette wheels without using progression (flat betting) - then it's not really a "system". It would be an AP program - which uses bias analysis, or other metrics, which increases the accuracy of predictions.

No, none of the systems he uses can be classed as AP because they're all based on past events and numbers. As I said, there are multiple systems, ranging from a few straight-up numbers to outside bets, although nothing of lower odds than EC. The bet selections are based on patterns, trends or hot/cold events or numbers - classic gambler's fallacy stuff! And the money-management is flat-betting most of the time; the pattern is to start with higher odds bets (like a street) and then, if needed, losses are recovered using a lower odds bet (like a dozen or EC). It's kind of like a 'parachute' system only in reverse.

[Joe]

In other words, the RNG was rigged to let you win first, only to take all of your money in the end and hope you didn't learn your lesson the first time around.  I sure did though. I got it back up to 5k and withdrew.  Never played again.

But if your in law is thriving then good for him.

He never plays RNG because he says they are too easily manipulated (and I tend to agree, even though I don't think cheating is nearly as common as players make out). And he has multiple accounts and is not greedy. He said his goal was too make no more than what he used to earn at his old job. He does that while putting in far fewer hours.

[pepper]

reverse

Since all loses won't be recoved, you should try reversing it when that doesn't work. Perhaps go from the lower odds bets to the higher odds bets. This still won't give you an edge, but it heads you in the right direction.

[gizmotron2]

The bet selections are based on patterns, trends or hot/cold events or numbers - classic gambler's fallacy stuff!

That's not gambler's fallacy. It's a form of confirmation bias used as a positive thing. In confirmation bias you see what you want to see.  Gambler's fallacy is a basic premise that something is due because of cause and effect.  If there is a streak of reds then more blacks are due. That is a fallacy.  The difference, the way that I see it, is that a thing is in a current state of happening and that It might happen some more.  But also an added layer is running on top of all that. There is a trend for when these guesses go into a very effective state.

Here is proof of this concept where trends are completely left out of the selection process. All bet selections are placed on Red and Red only for the next 300 spins, about 10 hours of live play at a busy casino. You bet $90 on each bet that is in a state of working very good in stretches or streaks. You bet $5 on all other conditions for each spin.  So it goes from observing trends to actual telemetry of real effectiveness and the recognition or awareness of these conditional states. Nothing is believed to be due. It just comes and goes all on it's own and without any expectation or magical belief.

I think people need things defined as gambler's fallacy in order to confirm the rational for dismissing things that they have not clearly thought out. In other words it's a defense mechanism or a control mechanism for misunderstanding disagreement. It's comforting to not have to think. It's a relief from that burden. Many people give themselves the permission to dismiss ideas that require extra work to understand because the group thinkers give them that permission & out.  It's OK now, and later they will have group think remorse. Pack mentality is for easy passage and an uneventful life. Those that find out last will get what they set out to get.