Precognition - PROOF! results from MPR - the real holy grail

[Kairomancer]

@CLF7, read this article to have a proper understanding of what GSR devices are intended for. It is not a magic device that does intuition for you on auto-pilot. In fact it has nothing to do directly with intuition.

link:://:.abilitymeters.com/gsr.htm

You could research billateral meters instead, which indicates which part of your brain hemisphere is active.

[pepper]

So you believe in intuition but not precog?

Isn't intuition precog?

You still seem to have a materialistic mentality.

Who exactly do you make yourself out to be? Have you renounced your possessions? If so, how are you communicating with us?

[precogmiles]

Isn't intuition precog?Who exactly do you make yourself out to be? Have you renounced your possessions? If so, how are you communicating with us?

It's called accepting reality for what it is. Materialism is flawed and out dated.

[Moxy]

It's called accepting reality for what it is. Materialism is flawed and out dated.

Dr. Strange?  Is that you?

[Clf7]

@CLF7, read this article to have a proper understanding of what GSR devices are intended for. It is not a magic device that does intuition for you on auto-pilot. In fact it has nothing to do directly with intuition.

link:://:.abilitymeters.com/gsr.htm

You could research billateral meters instead, which indicates which part of your brain hemisphere is active.

Ok thanks.... i Just trust steve about roulette and he has high expectation about this devise so i have too  I am not into it to judge it, but what are you saying (criticism) is completly logic

[precogmiles]

Dr. Strange?  Is that you?

You realise at this point your posts just appear like spam?

[Crux]

Do you have any suggestions as of what to do to improve?

Hi Precogmiles, did you catch my first post?

[precogmiles]

Hi Precogmiles, did you catch my first post?

Hi crux,

The simple answer is practice. Just like any skill in life you have to practice.

Second is what and how to practice. I wasted more time than I should have but that's because nobody was there to guide me.

I would suggest the following for practice. Learn to stop the internal noise, learn to imagine, learn to dowse. Eat healthy, drink healthy.

Read through these forums and experiment. What works for one person might not work for someone else. Find your own way.

[Crux]

Find your own way.

Thanks Precogmiles.

I read in one of Dean Radin’s books that the average persons psychic precognition ability is 2% in force choice tests. I figure that if a person trains to be better they could raise that percentage to 3% beating the house edge. Who knows how high that percentage could go in the long run.

[RouletteKnight]

Did you try the Zener ESP app? That app has some test. I always do the precog training.

You have 25 rounds. Always 5 options. If you gues 6 or more right it's above luck. Just a 24% chance i was not due luck. The higher you get the more chance its not due luck but skill. It also give you a average. You can reset it anytime you want. Every mondag i reset. The first week i just got average result. Meaning just between 15% and 25% on weekly avg.

Now, many months later i get way beter results. Weekly avg is around 40%. So i get 10 out of 25 rounds right. There is a 80% chance its not due luck.

Its all there in the app. Try it. Do you're own reseach. Why trust others? You don't trust us, but you do trust other people you also never met. It's very easy to do this on your own.

I tried it thrice. My results were 7,6,7. All above average but still not that statiscally significant? I had some precog stuff happen when I was a kid so I believe there's some innate ability.

By the way, it takes a lot of concentration and time and I got sloppy at times doing it. My main method is to have a finger go over each card and feel if it's "right". Visualise, if you press it what would come out. You probably have to go through each card a few times to feel that one of it has an overwhelming probability and then you choose it.

[Steve]

It is very hard to get statistically significant results with precog. I suggest just keep going and improve. If it's working, results will continue to be positive. And if good results are just luck, you still had good results. Even if your system is bad, whatever you're doing to win, keep doing it (unless you can clearly see proper testing shows it doesnt work, and will eventually fail). But at least with precog, the science is more plausible than 1+1=3.

[RouletteKnight]

Sorry winforus, that's just psychobabble. And you're assuming I'm a "materialist", but what has that got to do with predicting the future? I can refuse to be a materialist but that doesn't imply I believe in precognition.

What you're advising is that I should believe in precognition even if there's no evidence for it? 

Science isn't a belief system like you think, it's a way of rigorously testing ideas against reality. You can have any ideas you want but they have to past the reality test or they should get dumped.

Did I say it was? Of course it isn't, but it's the best method we have found so far. It's done a lot for us and will do a lot more if you'll let it. It seems to me like you're prejudiced against science. And I think you should get off your high horse; few here are interested in absolute truth, whatever that is. They just want to win at roulette.   

There is a way science can prove it. It is quantum entanglement which is a phenomenon proven by scientists that changing a state in particle A will result a change in particle B regardless of distance. Meaning particle B could be several light years at the other end of the universe and it doesn't matter at all.

This shows that the universe is somehow connected to one another. Therefore, psychic powers might possibly exist if someone can tap onto this connection. In a true reality by nature, changing something in A shouldn't affect B billions of miles away, but it does in this reality. If you want to go further down the rabbit hole, we might possibly be living in a very advanced computer simulation like in the matrix. In a computer game, distance is an illusion and the computer knows exactly what is happening at every single point like shown in quantum entanglement. Elon Musk himself said that the chances we are not living in a simulation is one to a billion.

[RouletteKnight]

Furthermore supproting evidence that the universe could be a very advanced computer simulation is the infamous double slit experiment.

When scientists shoot a beam into two slits, it forms a wave interference pattern. When they shot a single photon at a time thinking it will show just two slits with no interference, but no, the single photon somehow still formed a wave interference pattern. That single photon was able to split itself to form the wave pattern when it couldn't be possible. Now this is when things get super weird, when the scientists tried to observe which photon was shot into which slit, the photon suddenly knew that it was being observed and the interference pattern doesn't show up.

It is very weird indeed that an observer can influence the state of reality. It brings to mind how a computer game generates its environment in open world games. Only when the player comes into a particular area does the trees, the cars and buildings are generated, but when the player leaves those cease to exist. But to the player playing it seems like a seamless enviroment.

[Taotie]

...more plausible than 1+1=3.

Precog = I think this so that is that or, 1+1= whatever the f*ck I say.. LOL!


...and I don't really need to test this too much, you know, like a system, because it's precog, and it would take too long, and I got some good results so far over the last coupla thousand spins, so it's good enough for me and the other precogs. You system junkies should all drop roulette and go get a life that has some meaning above earning shitty dollars gambling your families future money away.

[Taotie]

Yeah, I knew you were gonna reply with that shit.