Precognition - PROOF! results from MPR - the real holy grail

[precogmiles]

Why do you need to trust me, to take on this proposal? Are you able to read?

We both will escrow the money to a trusted 3rd party, for example Steve. When we complete all of ours spins - they will verify it, and then they will transfer that money to the winner. All of the spins are logged in RS and are very easy to track.

This bet and proposal will show you, that precognition gives me a higher edge than any system that you try to play does.

If you believe that precognition is nothing more than random guessing, then this should be an easy bet for you to take, after all - you have systems and I am sure Gizmotron would be willing to coach you with Reading Randomness.

Either put the money where your mouth is, or gtfo - at this point you are just spamming this thread.

I didn't think he would take the offer.

I don't think he is serious at all, maybe he is just bored.

[winforus]

I didn't think he would take the offer.

I don't think he is serious at all, maybe he is just bored.

He is either a troll or one of the most dumbest/ignorant people that I seen on this forum. It's not just this thread - but across many threads.

Either way - the fact that he is not willing to take the bet, just shows that his talk is all empty and he doesn't even believe in the BS that he is saying.

[Moxy]

And I have re-read Nowun’s thread and what is interesting, is that I am actually doing exactly what he was in intermediate stages - seeing numbers by looking into blank space and playing the finals - unless very sure about a specific number. And mixing up 3 and 8s, 7s and 1s, etc I find that on 2s and 5s I can bet very confidently and hit around 90% of the time - and with 8s,7s, and 1s I can’t, the hit ratio is lower. And being out of sync - when the number comes after you switch to a new number. He is now at a very advanced stage and it’s definitely inspiring to hopefully one day getting there.

I also understand why he says that winning is boring - it involves doing things very methodically and playing short sessions, without the high of getting a “big hit” or chasing after a big loss. I have a hard time hitting 2 in a row in the very beginning and then not wanting to play more - but the optimal move would be to stop and continue after some time - since you hit your goal.

Also,  imo precognition is definitely the future of AP, and not just for Roulette.  And we are ahead of the game - knowing it while it’s so unknown and unheard of.

Oh brother.

[Moxy]

100% agree, as you said precog can be used for other things beside roulette.

I can't believe that in other forums they don't even test systems anymore they just accept the results posted by the player.

This forum and the precog approach are light years ahead of the rest of these failed systems.

Okie Dokie

[pepper]

I've been playing roulette for the last fifteen years and I know what I'm saying

No offense, but this is nothing to brag about. In fact it demonstrates that you are a loser, unless you have been playing for free (simulations) or unless you have an edge over the casino.

[pepper]

Oh brother.

U repeater. U already said that on 6/17/2020 at 12:42pm (eastern time)

[pepper]

Okie Dokie

Reruns, REALLY?! Is this sum kinda sick joke?

U typed that on ur computer or laptop on 6/18/2020 at 3:42pm (eastern time)

[Moxy]

Reruns, REALLY?! Is this sum kinda sick joke?

U typed that on ur computer or laptop on 6/18/2020 at 3:42pm (eastern time)

That's very nice detective work.  You see the issue is...  I was trying to...  Someone must've...

I have no life.  There, you happy now.

[Steve]

[precogmiles]

I thought I would pay homeage to Ingo swann and make him first place on MPR 

[Steve]

Good work. You dont need to convince me. It just takes time, persistence and the right mindset.

[Taotie]

It wont work. If you've had short-term success, that's all it is.

[pepper]

I'm still very skeptical about precognition for roulette. I mean wouldn't playing card games for money/gambling be like a thousand times easier because the information is already there? So, precognition could be real, but it seems like all the self-claimed “precogers” here have skipped doing something that's a thousand times easier to do the nearly impossible of gaining an edge through "precognition.”

[Steve]

Taotie, that may be the case, as I've said before. But what has  chance at working:

a. 1+1=42, or
b. An approach that has reasonable logic, but is comparatively untested, and has some promising results.

Taotie, you know there's a lot about our reality we dont know. But there's nothing to substantiate 1+1=42.

[Taotie]

I'm still very skeptical about precognition for roulette. I mean wouldn't playing card games for money/gambling be like a thousand times easier because the information is already there? So, precognition could be real, but it seems like all the self-claimed “precogers” here have skipped doing something that's a thousand times easier to do the nearly impossible of gaining an edge through "precognition.”

To be sure, there's a lot of skippin' going on around here.