Precognition - PROOF! results from MPR - the real holy grail

[cht]

I do not agree with you.
because you say you have a winning bet and there is no safe bet to win, is that not contradicted?

Is there a need for 100% win every betting session to profit itlr?

Do the casino who has the house edge win every betting session to rake in billions?

Are you aware that casinos lose hundreds of millions due to negative variance losing streak ?

Do you know that the exposure to risk of ruin is not measured by this 100% no lose bet?

The rate of return is not measured by 100% no lose bet?

This is real math. Not bs.

Your expectation is flawed.

[cht]

I want to tell you and assure you that there is a safe bet to win 100% each session.

I have created an algorithm that can always win at roulette!
I can win from single to full bets!
Everyone has their necessary funds to ensure a profit on each session, but they are all winners!

Are you aware that online casinos can easily make your precious 100% win Algo lose?

Are you aware if play your 100% win Algo manually in b&m manual table the casino can still make you lose?

I spot bs from far. Stop making bs post with no real money experience.

Even if you created a positive edge proven by million spins rx code, it has no guarantee that you make real money in real casino.

That's the hard truth.

The real enemy is the CASINO.

So stop this bs boasting.

Spend time think how to make real money.

[precogmiles]

There is no need for validation from Internet strangers. No care if others don't believe.

In principle I agree, but how can anyone validate any of these claims if nobody proves anything?

Just look at 'game over'/hector he has just made a big claim. If he was to get to first place on MPR and roulette simulator plus show rx graphs, then that would prove a lot. As it stands he is just another person in a long line of people claiming the holy grail.

Cht If you don't believe evidence is worthwhile then that means forums are useless. If every claim is to be accepted without evidence this place will turn into a zoo.

[precogmiles]

Forums should be a place for GAMBLERS to discuss ideas what works and what don't.

Nobody has to provide prove of anything. This call for proof is bullshit.

How do you know what works without proof?

[cht]

Cht If you don't believe evidence is worthwhile then that means forums are useless. If every claim is to be accepted without evidence this place will turn into a zoo.

Depends on the member's mindset.

I take forum for sharing creative ideas, learn technical stuff like coding and industry matters.

About guru claims, I do learn what don't work after wasting years testing trash. I paid the price to get educated and experience.

This forum is indeed the gambler's zoo. You learn about what don't work. That's the trick. My thread(I keep advertising) explains the math in layman terms to farking hardcore gambler's.

The math Boyz wrote that long time ago. Hardcore gambler refuse to believe. That's my fault, no one to blame.

One more very important point,

Even if someone provide proof of 100% positive edge bet, there's no guarantee he can win in real casino.

Taking real cash from casino is a different level of challenge.

To all those 100% win bullshit gurus, why have you not made your millions yet? Why have you not played in Vegas, Macau?

[cht]

How do you know what works without proof?

Do the dirty work, test it.

If you are smarter, get educated with the math. No point testing if the design ignores the math.

Read my thread. 😎

[precogmiles]

Joe made this comment about anomaly that naturally and spontaneously occuring with random spins.

Can you give me the post link please?

[cht]

Can you give me the post link please?

He made that comment on roulettelife forum. Check his recent posts. The most important math based post on forums.

[precogmiles]

He made that comment on roulettelife forum. Check his recent posts. The most important math based post on forums.

Is it the one taking about..Turnaround' by a guy named Ian Harmer.?

[cht]

Some excerpts from his posts that he repeated.

Without collecting physical parameters it's no better than betting on the layout unless you find some anomaly which indicates bias.

UNLESS the past spins reveal some anomaly or bias.

Fact is, outcomes only conform to stats in the long term, and even then the stats don't tell you the order of individual outcomes, so you can't get an edge that way unless they indicate some anomaly or bias.

Anomaly and/or bias is the only way.

The rest is bs. Use your brain if you still have one.


"And betting on the outside or any group on the layout isn't effective; you need to place bets only on the numbers which you have identified as having an edge"

Read my posts how I did it. Read the exact similarity. Based on math😊

[precogmiles]

Some excerpts from his posts that he repeated.

Without collecting physical parameters it's no better than betting on the layout unless you find some anomaly which indicates bias.

UNLESS the past spins reveal some anomaly or bias.

Fact is, outcomes only conform to stats in the long term, and even then the stats don't tell you the order of individual outcomes, so you can't get an edge that way unless they indicate some anomaly or bias.

Anomaly and/or bias is the only way.

The rest is bs. Use your brain if you still have one.

If spins are independent how can you have an anomaly?

[cht]

If spins are independent how can you have an anomaly?

You got a point, Tbh I don't know the answer.

Perhaps the observed anomaly indicates bias, idk? 🤔

[winforus]

Precogmiles, congrats. Very impressive results, and very inspiring. I have came to the same conclusion regarding precogniton - it’s greatest value is learning about reality and yourself.

It’s funny how before you started showing the results on mpr and rs - all of those system junkies demanded it. Now they are saying it’s not enough, and likely won’t change. The greatest value of you showing this proof is not to system junkies but to people who are on the border, which this might serve as an invitation to explore this.

Don’t expect them to give up the systems. It would be a huge hit to their ego, and addiction. It’s a huge illusion, based on unexamined beliefs, which is hard to crack.

[Klausy]

The greatest value of you showing this proof is not to system junkies but to people who are on the border, which this might serve as an invitation to explore this.

My thoughts precisely, well done precogmiles. Maybe this is not the place to do it but any update on methods or techniques on a suitable thread would be appreciated. I’m sure there are lots like me who have used the techniques on threads like the guide and info one and are getting results on an inconsistent basis, a slight adjustment might make a big difference.

[precogmiles]

Precogmiles, congrats. Very impressive results, and very inspiring. I have came to the same conclusion regarding precogniton - it’s greatest value is learning about reality and yourself.

It’s funny how before you started showing the results on mpr and rs - all of those system junkies demanded it. Now they are saying it’s not enough, and likely won’t change. The greatest value of you showing this proof is not to system junkies but to people who are on the border, which this might serve as an invitation to explore this.

Don’t expect them to give up the systems. It would be a huge hit to their ego, and addiction. It’s a huge illusion, based on unexamined beliefs, which is hard to crack.

Thanks winforus. Yes it is hilarious how jealous they have become, instead of it opening their minds to new possibilities.