Precognition - PROOF! results from MPR - the real holy grail

[precogmiles]

My thoughts precisely, well done precogmiles. Maybe this is not the place to do it but any update on methods or techniques on a suitable thread would be appreciated. I’m sure there are lots like me who have used the techniques on threads like the guide and info one and are getting results on an inconsistent basis, a slight adjustment might make a big difference.

Thanks klausy, I have seen your games on RS and while the results maybe inconsistent you are definitely doing the right thing, which is practice. Practice is the most important thing.

My advice for now would be to continue practising. I would also suggest you practice on other games/tests, for example like zener cards, or multiple choice tests. They have a good selection of tests at psiresearch, Google it.

Keep practising.  I have just started a new research project investigating variance. I will share my findings soon, along with my regular update.

[precogmiles]

You got a point, Tbh I don't know the answer.

Perhaps the observed anomaly indicates bias, idk? 🤔

At least you are being honest about. I have looked at your thread again and it is still very confusing. If you have an edge can you explain clearly what your edge is?

[cht]

At least you are being honest about. I have looked at your thread again and it is still very confusing. If you have an edge can you explain clearly what your edge is?

My thread is about the math of roulette interpreted and discussed in layman terms so that anyone can easily understand. This way people are full aware and educated about the basic math. Learn the math and physics from the videos I posted, that's my advice.

My thread is NOT about my edge. I have written many times yet.
I prefer to stop posting about my edge. Don't serve any purpose for ME.
So stop asking or talking about it.


I prefer to discuss other people's edge. 😎

[precogmiles]

My thread is about the math of roulette interpreted and discussed in layman terms so that anyone can easily understand. This way people are full aware and educated about the basic math. Learn the math and physics from the videos I posted, that's my advice.

My thread is NOT about my edge. I have written many times yet.
I prefer to stop posting about my edge. Don't serve any purpose for ME.
So stop asking or talking about it.


I prefer to discuss other people's edge. 😎

Ok then where can I find the post where you explain your edge?

[Klausy]

Thanks klausy, I have seen your games on RS and while the results maybe inconsistent you are definitely doing the right thing, which is practice. Practice is the most important thing.

My advice for now would be to continue practising. I would also suggest you practice on other games/tests, for example like zener cards, or multiple choice tests. They have a good selection of tests at psiresearch, Google it.

RS is a great practice resource. I diligently built up a 50k balance off small bets only to blow it all on a few big game sessions. There’s an important lesson to learn on discipline, keep to what is working and don’t chase losses!

I started out on Zener cards (very marginal success - 21.25% off of 3350 draws) but got bored quite easily after 10 mins or so. Will check out psiresearch, thanks.

[cht]

Ok then where can I find the post where you explain your edge?

I don't like to post about my edge.

I prefer to post about the 2LoTD that random spin outcomes must conform to. It's science. Not bs.

I posted science and math videos. Yet people laugh and mock at it. Real science. 

This is the natural and spontaneous occurring anomaly with random spins.

The big question in everyone's mind is WTF is this 2LoTD in random spins?

That's the million dollar question.

You got to have brains to figure this out. It's farking simple if you truly understand this law. Engineering, physics and especially math major in stats undergrads have great advantage on this.

Watch the video, open your eyes listen carefully. It's right there in those videos specially selected to present the real physics math.

[Moxy]

I don't like to post about my edge.

I prefer to post about the 2LoTD that random spin outcomes must conform to. It's science. Not bs.

I posted science and math videos. Yet people laugh and mock at it. Real science. 

This is the natural and spontaneous occurring anomaly with random spins.

The big question in everyone's mind is WTF is this 2LoTD in random spins?

That's the million dollar question.

You got to have brains to figure this out. It's farking simple if you truly understand this law. Engineering, physics and especially math major in stats undergrads have great advantage on this.

Watch the video, open your eyes listen carefully. It's right there in those videos specially selected to present the real physics math.

Okie dokie

[Joe]

Without collecting physical parameters it's no better than betting on the layout unless you find some anomaly which indicates bias.

I wasn't talking about any 'anomaly' which exists for every wheel (or however the numbers are generated), I was talking about AP. The 'Law of the Third', or any other statistical pattern isn't an anomaly because they are all predicted by the maths, the binomial distribution, geometric distribution, etc, and don't forget that all those distributions which pertain to roulette outcomes assume independent trials where the probability doesn't change between spins.

A true anomaly will only exist for certain wheels and/or under certain circumstances. If you think you can walk up to any wheel in any casino and expect to find this 'anomaly', then you don't understand the meaning of the word.

Anomaly : something that deviates from what is standard, normal, or expected.

That doesn't mean 'rare' statistical events which are outside 3 standard deviations, because they are normal too and part of randomness.

[cht]

Since I am unwilling to discuss this 2LoTD entropy anomaly in random roulette outcomes, any discussion on this topic is meaningless.

I was merely responding to precogman's query. Case close.

[winforus]

Cht, you say that winning on RS and MPR is not enough, and that you want to see real money winnings.

And where is your proof? There is none. Like I said, when Gizmotron stops posting, you take his place. You write a lot of scribbles, show 0 proof and are not willing to to discuss where your edge comes from.

If you want to get attention and feel like a guru, do it in the systems section. This is a precogniton thread.

[cht]

Cht, you say that winning on RS and MPR is not enough, and that you want to see real money winnings.

And where is your proof? There is none. Like I said, when Gizmotron stops posting, you take his place. You write a lot of scribbles, show 0 proof and are not willing to to discuss where your edge comes from.

If you want to get attention and feel like a guru, do it in the systems section. This is a precogniton thread.

I did not ask for real money proof from precogman.

I ask him to try win real money with his precog skills.

You have deliberately misinterpreted my post.

I repeat, "I will not discuss my positive edge bet".

It serves no purpose for me.

I only discuss the math of roulette. Period.

I repeat, "I am not a roulette guru."
This is the stupidest thing to do on forum.

I am now properly educated about the math of roulette.

I can point out your post that you make mistakes in your understanding of the math.

[cht]

And where is your proof? There is none.

Put your money where your mouth is.

Pay me usd$100 for every one session played.

You get to see the 100 spins graph.

Are you up to it?

[winforus]

I did not ask for real money proof from precogman.

I ask him to try win real money with his precog skills.

You have deliberately misinterpreted my post.

I repeat, "I will not discuss my positive edge bet".

It serves no purpose for me.

I only discuss the math of roulette. Period.

I repeat, "I am not a roulette guru."
This is the stupidest thing to do on forum.

I am now properly educated about the math of roulette.

I can point out your post that you make mistakes in your understanding of the math.

Everything that you need to know about the math - was already covered in depth a long time ago by Steve. There are a ton of videos and information on his website. It is not my problem, that it took so long for you to understand such basic things.

You asking him to win real money, is the same as asking for proof of winning real money. There really is no difference.

You won't discuss your "positive edge" bet, because you don't have one. If you had one, you wouldn't be posting here, trying to get attention. You would be busy winning.

[cht]

Everything that you need to know about the math - was already covered in depth a long time ago by Steve. There are a ton of videos and information on his website. It is not my problem, that it took so long for you to understand such basic things.

You asking him to win real money, is the same as asking for proof of winning real money. There really is no difference.

You won't discuss your "positive edge" bet, because you don't have one. If you had one, you wouldn't be posting here, trying to get attention. You would be busy winning.

Cut the crap loudmouth.

Pay up usd$100 you get your first 100spins graph.

No more response until I see the money. 💰💰💰

[winforus]

Put your money where your mouth is.

Pay me usd$100 for every one session played.

You get to see the 100 spins graph.

Are you up to it?

You claim to understand math, yet you are only offering 100 spins. You think that 100 spins is enough to prove that you have an edge?

I will offer you 1 to 1 odds, against you winning. For example we both wager $100 each. We can do it for 100 spins, 1000,10000,etc. Essentially I will bet on casino and against you winning.

Since you have a positive edge, this should be an easy bet for you to take!