Can Parachuting help?

[Tinsoldiers]

but hedging and parachuting

What makes you think so. The sole reason we are discussing is because somewhere you wrote you are looking for a long term method. But if you are looking at hedging and parachuting, all these are individual cases of doing different methods. How is the sequence of placing methods matter? It is as if placing varied bets on dozen, varied bets on lines etc either one after other or mingled with each other. Outcome is house edge. You keep talking about big picture, why are you lost in details not able to see the big picture?

[falkor2k15]

I told you before: I'm fully aware of the house edge and the difficult challenge we face trying to beat a seemingly unbeatable game, but all these ideas are original and untested - so without gaining new perspectives from on-going experimentation/evidence - we cannot claim to understand the bigger picture. It's like ignoring everything the flat-earthers highlight and assuming the earth is a globe. We have to go through a process to discover the truth - analysing both sides of the story. Others who came before me put forward these ideas and stressed the importance of stitching, parachuting and hedging; I even provided transcripts for some of Priyanka's videos where she clearly demonstrated such concepts, so until they've been exhausted we cannot be sure of the bigger picture. In addition to the initial suggestions coming from priyanka and rrbb as the basis for the topic, I have also gone through a process of reverse engineering, which in turn has indicated certain merits with these concepts - thus justifying the continuation of this project. Again, you need to read the topic from the beginning to understand how we have progressed to where we are now.

Today I had another eureka moment based on previous testing, where you may recall: the risk of full recovery was relieved through opting for partial recovery to a previous level? Well, I now realise that the ultimate application of this recovery technique happens to be through flat-betting, which is therefore the next logical step in the process:

[Blueprint]

Will sum it up for you - you don’t know.  The end.

[falkor2k15]

Will sum it up for you - you don’t know.  The end.

If you don't know something then you keep looking at the evidence more and more till it tells you the truth.

[RouletteGhost]

you have a lot of free time

it is amazing actually

[falkor2k15]

You want to have fun in the casino, right? Well, this flat-betting method has so far made +184:

[RouletteGhost]

unfortunately you do not post a strategy with rules/how to play

we bust your chops because no one understands the charts you post

what program is that by the way?

your flat bet method you posted above this post....WHAT IS IT?

[falkor2k15]

The program hasn't been used for 20 years - almost extinct - I'm the only one in the world who still uses it.

If you read the entire topic then you would understand the rules up till now, but I'll go over it again in more detail once the strategy is complete.

[RouletteGhost]

eh...when you go over something in detail its CERTAIN i wont understand it

clear and concise rules, or all we see is a 20 year old program

[Scarface]

Falknor, it would greatly help if you explain in simple terms.  Maybe try explaining it in steps, that even a child would understand.  Keep it simple 

Noticed you often call out "gamblers fallacy" when it come to strategies based on repeaters or GUT.  What's different about your strategy that doesn't make it a fallacy?

[falkor2k15]

Falknor, it would greatly help if you explain in simple terms.  Maybe try explaining it in steps, that even a child would understand.  Keep it simple 

Noticed you often call out "gamblers fallacy" when it come to strategies based on repeaters or GUT.  What's different about your strategy that doesn't make it a fallacy?

As I keep saying to everyone: read the topic from the beginning, which amounts to an essay explaining why this strategy is different, original, and previously untested.

[Scarface]

If it's working good for you, keep it up.  Any strategy that gets good results without the use of steep progressions sounds good to me.

[falkor2k15]

I am still working on this strategy, but haven't had much time lately since starting a new job. This link is quite useful to read as a background to understanding why sleeping CL2s are primarily the basis for this parachute strategy as opposed to repeats (used here only to form unequal event targets based around the cycle length):
link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=20693.0

Lately, flat-betting has been helpful in understanding things better... When we hedge and parlay, if we get a break even on the first spin then we can still play the 2nd spin like a normal stitched bet (without the additional "let it ride" units). Before, I was completely omitting the 2nd bet upon not winning - outright - the first bet.

Another key finding is that we should parachute first to targets that offer "reduced losses" despite being a similar ratio, before we look for a proper decreased ratio/increased payout target. This is because Hedged bets, in particular, often break even, thereby allowing a free reattempt at the same parachute level.

[falkor2k15]

Here's a demonstration of the break even and "free" reattempt at parachute level 3:

[falkor2k15]

All these hedge bets have the same payout, but offer more reductions on losses, i.e. more free "break even" reattempts:

So I am looking at combining them all into a single level 4, depending on what's opportunistic at the time following level 3.

These are virtually the same too:

Not sure how to treat them yet - maybe combine again into a single level. Later, you will see these have an additional layer of security in terms of a reduced follow up bet on a break even as mentioned previously - an extra attempt before a reattempt so to speak.