• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

The only way to beat roulette is by increasing accuracy of predictions (changing the odds). This is possible on many real wheels.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Fun Factory

Started by ignatus, Aug 04, 04:02 AM 2018

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

junscissorhands

Although I do not like like PassionRuleta and his way of luring people into sending him money. He was not a complete moron. He knows some stuff, but he doesn't have the complete form. Sure he can have many lucky runs, but he doesn't have a   100% winning consistency and he knows that. Hence, getting people to send him money.

I would say on this forum right now, 6thsense is the only guy who has a good firm understanding and view on how to beat it, and, maybe.. even consistently.
Don't be so naive.

Mako

Quote from: junscissorhands on Aug 08, 04:21 PM 2018
Bingo absolutely correct, I would say that system contains 20% or 1/5th of a HG. The key is to read and go through many many permanenzen on Wiesbaden, Hamburg etc. Go through all the old spins, or load them up on RX manually click them spin by spin and hopefully your brain has a click or eureka moment.

People say of course think I'm talking bullshit as past spins don't mean anything. But you need to look at the forest not just a tree.

Thanks buddy, appreciate the help greatly.

So few people left that actually know their shit and are willing to help.

junscissorhands


The people who get it eventually are the ones who deserve it. Plain and simple.

Although I'm very surprised that none of the AP guys actually  come out and say I'm full of shit and being the poster boy of Fallacy.



Don't be so naive.

junscissorhands

I have a strong feeling that John legend/sentinel is on this forum or even on this thread using a different nickname.
Don't be so naive.

ignatus

Quote from: junscissorhands on Aug 08, 06:06 PM 2018
I have a strong feeling that John legend/sentinel is on this forum or even on this thread using a different nickname.
0
What im sayin, now, pls? Get lost,? sorry if this get me banned? But pls? f*ck off man pls? im sorry, and am sorry everybody else, show me a system that has a higher winrate than 80% "OK" what the hell are you expecting? a HG?...pls pls F*CK OFF NOW....Thank you.

The problem with this system is not the winrate, the problem with this system is the MoneyManagement and the progression.

sorry everybody, but THIS guy? what the hell?....  >:(
If you like to donate link::[url="//paypal.me/ignatus1"]//paypal.me/ignatus1[/url]

"Focus on predicting wheel sectors where the ball is expected to land" ~Steve

Ross

re: Post 34.

My feelings exactly. 
Eighty- four and counting.  Is age an excuse?

Ross

I don't place too much store on test with RX.

Any system need human brain input.  Just
betting without considering each spin is, to
me, like driving without brakes.  Just ignore
speed restrictions and red lights and you
know what will happen.

An update to my IgSpins programme.



Some info in the "How To".
Eighty- four and counting.  Is age an excuse?

junscissorhands

Ignatus I'm not saying it's you.

It's someone else, you don't have his writing style.
Don't be so naive.

ignatus

Quote from: junscissorhands on Aug 08, 06:37 PM 2018
Ignatus I'm not saying it's you.

It's someone else, you don't have his writing style.

I lost my temper, i am sorry... :( i shouldn't have....but all your critizism, i think it's really unneccesay,.. ok,:/ im doing what i can, And obvously i can't do better than 80% winrate,

And Ross, impressive software, thanks

Again, i am sorry,.. :(

If you like to donate link::[url="//paypal.me/ignatus1"]//paypal.me/ignatus1[/url]

"Focus on predicting wheel sectors where the ball is expected to land" ~Steve

junscissorhands

You are doing good iggy! No worries.

But you've done better, there were a few methods in the past if you've sticked with them and kept refining them you would've had much better results.
Don't be so naive.

ignatus

Quote from: junscissorhands on Aug 08, 07:08 PM 2018
You are doing good iggy! No worries.

But you've done better, there were a few methods in the past if you've sticked with them and kept refining them you would've had much better results.

ok...yes,, maybe so? But im truly sick of this repeaters- systems, AND i doubt ANY repeaters system whatsoever could have a higher winrate than 80%...owell,
If you like to donate link::[url="//paypal.me/ignatus1"]//paypal.me/ignatus1[/url]

"Focus on predicting wheel sectors where the ball is expected to land" ~Steve

junscissorhands

And I respect that.
Don't be so naive.

ozon

Is everyone in this forum today drunk.
If someone wins over 5k spins with negative progression, I will be really surprised

  I'm not saying that it's not possible, but I'm really surprised

luckyfella

Ignatius, you are sick of repeaters, that's good :thumbsup:
Goodbye everyone - 20/10/2019

Mako

Did another group of hit and run sessions with this today (+100/-300u target stoploss).  Still using the progression that tops out at 8-8-8 and then resets back to 1-1-1 regardless of whether it's a win or loss.

It's so fast to test that I do it for fun when I need a break from Vaddi code-breaking  :twisted:

10 sessions played
10 wins / 0 losses
1366 total spins (RX RNG 00 wheel)

Net gain: +909u

-