DS Simples!

[buffalowizard]

Simple yet effective for DS.

Each mini game is 8 spins long.

Track the first 2, then bet those first 2 to hit again in the next 6 spins.

progression standard 112346

2
5  bet 2,5 six times
1
5  W +1
3
1
4
4

BW

[buffalowizard]

A few mini games:

5
2 bet 5,2
2 W+2
3
3
1
5
5

4
3 bet 4,3
5
1
1
5
4 W+3
4

2
4 bet 2,4
4 W+5
4
1
6
2
6

1
3 bet 1,3
3 W+7
6
4
1
1
5

6
1 bet 6,1
4
5
3
5
6 W+8
2

1
2 bet 1,2
3
5
4
2 W+10
1
5

2
4 bet 2,4
1
5
2 W+12
1
6
4

4
6 bet 4,6
6 W+14
3
1
1
2
2

5
6 bet 5,6
3
2
5 +16
5
3
1

6
3 bet 6,3
5
4
4
6 +18
2
5

Maybe a better progression could be used for this, but has a consistent hit rate

BW

[RouletteGhost]

Can I make one suggestion

If both DS are in the same dozen which would mean betting the same dozen. Don’t do it since a dozen can sleep for a long time

Only bet if the DS are in two different dozens

[Kattila]

I would bet for max 5 spins with this progression:
Up level after W session (if necesary), Down level after L session
to reduce losses if eventual  lossing streak of bad sessions,
reset at new high.

1,1,2,3,5 / 5,5,10,15,25 / 25,25,50,75,125 / 125,125, 250,375, 625 (optional level).

[buffalowizard]

Can I make one suggestion

If both DS are in the same dozen which would mean betting the same dozen. Don’t do it since a dozen can sleep for a long time

Only bet if the DS are in two different dozens

Agreed, good suggestion

[buffalowizard]

I would bet for max 5 spins with this progression:
Up level after W session (if necesary), Down level after L session
to reduce losses if eventual  lossing streak of bad sessions,
reset at new high.

1,1,2,3,5 / 5,5,10,15,25 / 25,25,50,75,125 / 125,125, 250,375, 625 (optional level).

Kattila, thanks, I'll give it a try like this.

[RouletteGhost]

1. 36
2. 28
3. 34    W
4. 14
5. 34
6. 0
7. 14
8. 1
----------
9. 32
10. 31
11. 27
12. 25   W
13. 24
14. 27
15. 11
16. 33
----------
17. 3
18. 25
19. 5   W
20. 30
21. 3
22. 15
23. 27
24. 15
----------
25. 27
26. 31
27. 19
28. 3
29. 27   W
30. 35
31. 20
32. 6
----------
33. 7
34. 4
35. 16
36. 33
37. 16
38. 3   W
39. 30
40. 31
----------
41. 7
42. 12
43. 23
44. 7   W
45. 2
46. 29
47. 15
48. 23
----------
49. 9
50. 32
51. 21
52. 27
53. 2
54. 33    W
55. 12
56. 9
----------
57. 19
58. 31
59. 15
60. 13
61. 12
62. 11
63. 12
64. 19   W
----------
65. 29
66. 34
67. 30   W
68. 19
69. 25
70. 27
71. 18
72. 1
----------



PLAYING WITH ORIGINAL RULES, EVEN IF FIRST TWO DS WERE IN SAME DOZEN ALL WINS

played 75 american wheel live spins

[RouletteGhost]

2. 33
3. 11
4. 31   W
5. 12
6. 14
7. 10
8. 5
9. 15
--------
10. 36   
11. 34   SAME DS
12. 0     ZERO
13. 30       WOULDNT BET THIS SET?!
14. 22
15. 33
16. 18
17. 33
--------
18. 9
19. 10
20. 17
21. 24
22. 2
23. 14   W
24. 30
25. 27
--------
26. 2
27. 18
28. 18  W
29. 21
30. 26
31. 13
32. 11
33. 22
--------
34. 24
35. 14
36. 00
37. 18   W
38. 25
39. 6
40. 0
41. 5
--------
42. 0
43. 26
44. 21
45. 25  W
46. 15
47. 10
48. 4
49. 24
--------
50. 24
51. 2
52. 4   W
53. 00
54. 25
55. 24
56. 14
57. 1
--------
58. 12
59. 12
60. 24
61. 23    W
62. 29
63. 20
64. 35
65. 1
--------
66. 36
67. 5
68. 13
69. 22
70. 00
71. 9
72. 20
73. 1   W
--------


ALL WINS

WARRANTS FURTHER INVESTIGATION

[RouletteGhost]

1. 24
2. 31
3. 32  W
4. 21
5. 1
6. 12
7. 16
8. 00
--------
9. 32
10. 13
11. 3
12. 29
13. 23
14. 0
15. 29
16. 36    W
--------
17. 1
18. 31
19. 22
20. 19            LOSS
21. 24
22. 0
23. 9
24. 12
--------
25. 32
26. 10
27. 36   W
28. 9
29. 17
30. 27
31. 2
32. 1
--------
33. 34
34. 22
35. 0
36. 14
37. 13
38. 21  W
39. 7
40. 33
--------
41. 11
42. 22
43. 0
44. 14
45. 5
46. 36
47. 8   W
48. 29
--------



IN 200 SPINS ONLY ONE LOSING SET NOT BAD

[buffalowizard]

Yeah pretty good, right.

I think definitely go for broke after a lost session...2 lost in a row, you'd be damn unlucky

[RouletteGhost]

I’m terrible with math

Wonder how we’d bet with insurance on zero

Insurance on zero turns my losing set into a winning one

[The General]

I’m terrible with math

Wonder how we’d bet with insurance on zero

Insurance on zero turns my losing set into a winning one

If insuring your system with zero makes it a winner, then just bet zero, duh! 

[RouletteGhost]

i know systems are never something youd agree with (no matter what)

but the reason is that for this method ZERO does not fall into a double street....so it helps..

you do not even bother me anymore its posters like BLERGE and FALKOR that give me the heeby geebies

[The General]

i know systems are never something youd agree with (no matter what)

but the reason is that for this method ZERO does not fall into a double street....so it helps..

you do not even bother me anymore its posters like BLERGE and FALKOR that give me the heeby geebies

Ghost,

Step back and think about it.  Why should betting the zero help at all?  It just increases the amount of money you expose to the house edge.

In roulette you can't gain anything from hedging.

My advice, play to win more rather than to lose less.

[RouletteGhost]

Ghost,

Step back and think about it.  Why should betting the zero help at all?  It just increases the amount of money you expose to the house edge.

In roulette you can't gain anything from hedging.

My advice, play to win more rather than to lose less.

in this particular case, it is simple

it is a strategy betting the lines....zero is not part of a line....

the method survived 200 spins easily, it lost once, because of zero...

simple to understand